Nato length vs. Warsaw Pact AK Buttstock?

[Chindo18Z]

Anyone own or tried the "NATO" length AK stock from KVAR? Aside from overall length / compactness issues, does the full length buttstock allow any more accuracy or comfort while firing? I'm shot the shorter "standard" version...just wondering which to get.

 

[OEF_VET]

Chindo,

I've got the NATO lentgh stock set on my SAR-1 now. I like it. It feels better to me. As for accuracy, I couldn't really say one way or the other.

Frank

 

[eatatjoes]

a question; what is the length in inches of the NATO stock from the reciever(not overall length but just the part that sticks out) versus the warsaw stock?

 

[Gary G23]

Warsaw is approximately 9 1/4". Nato is approximately 10 1/2". I prefer the Nato.

 

[TCD]

I prefer the NATO as well...


I have the black KVAR set on my SAR1

 

[Gordon]

Here's one issue in favor of the Warsaw length: All the high speed low drag guys are spending $$$ on collapsable AR stocks, like wise with short pull lenths for shotties ect. Of course body armor is an issue, but guess what; that short LOP is very quick to mount indoors ect when CQB is the game. I found the East German Knobby red stocks to be ideal length for room clearing ect with an AK!

 

[JShirley]

I have short arms, so I either had my M4 stock fully collapsed, or at most, one click out.

Typical ComBlock stocks work great for me.