Need some .22 suggestions because my 22A two-pieced today (Pics)

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Beretta Neos.

Built like a bank vault. Steel. Quick change barrels. Easy to mount optics. Cheaper than a Ruger or Browning.

Etc."


I second this. Great gun and shoots very well all the time
 
Ruger convertible six for a single action revolver that will shoot Lr and Magnum.

CZ Kadet either the stand alone Kadet or the conversion kit for the CZ 75/85 pistols.

Used... a High Standard. One made in Ct after about 1960 (some of the earlier ones don't like HV ammo). These will have triggers that spoil you for other rim fire pistols. All steel, very accurate. Prices from $325-900.
 
Ruger convertible six for a single action revolver that will shoot Lr and Magnum.

CZ Kadet either the stand alone Kadet or the conversion kit for the CZ 75/85 pistols.

Used... a High Standard. One made in Ct after about 1960 (some of the earlier ones don't like HV ammo). These will have triggers that spoil you for other rim fire pistols. All steel, very accurate. Prices from $325-900.
NAA has those mini revolvers, the Mini Master that shoots both .22 LR and .22 Mag. Has interchangeable cylinders.
 
Serious question. WHy dont people ever suggest a Model 41?
Is it the price or is there another reason?

I really like mine but its the only .22 I have so I dont have much to go on.
Certainly a much better pistol than the 22A, although the only 22a Ive shot was a club gun in poor condition.

So why not more Model 41 love.
or is it because its not hard to click the safety into position by accident?
 
They cost a bunch and are really heavy. Not that heavy is a bad thing and to be honest I don't know how hard parts are to get for them these days. $1000 for a .22 unless you have a real purpose for it is kind of nuts.
 
imoXu:

I personally would love a 41. What's kept me from buying one...cost alone. Can buy three nice Ruger MkIIIs for the same price.

Others might be drawn to more modern polymer type .22s. That's not my style but there seem to be fewer people who appreciate polished blue and wood these days. Personally blue and walnut is right up my alley.

Maybe one of these days I'll get a 41 but I have other holes in the collection to fill first.
 
WHy dont people ever suggest a Model 41?
Is it the price or is there another reason?

For me it is grip angle. I have pistols costing as much or more than the M41, so why it is a lot of money, if you are going to compete or do serious target shooting $1K isn't really that much. Think Pardini, Benelli, Hammerli, etc.

However, for about half the cost of a M41 you can buy a Ruger MK II Target, and add a few Volquartsen or Clark parts and have something just as accurate. So yes VALUE, maybe more than cost is an issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top