Nevada Legislature Takes Up Reciprocity

Status
Not open for further replies.

Buck Nekkid

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
392
Location
Deep in The Heart of Texas
The Nevada Assembly Judiciary Committee heard a version of reciprocity yesterday and the State Senate Judiciary Committee heard a similar bill on Wednesday.

For complete info on what's happening in the Nevada Legistlature concerning firearms related bills go to: SECTION 11
 
I live in Nevada, I thought it had been passed a few years ago, maybe I am wrong.
 
Scnr: At this time Nevada does not recognize any other state's CCW. These two bills would change that. Check out SECTION 11 for a complete rundown on this and other pending legislation in the Assembly and Senate.

It is very important that all Nevada shooters let their legislators know about their support for these and other bills going through the process.
 
Love that Section 11 blog

Section 11 is a great resource!!! I check it daily.

Looks like I need to contact my reps, again.
 
Thanks

Thanks for the section 11 link, Ill add it to my daily reads

Morcoth
 
Thanks everyone. I enjoy writing SECTION 11 and really appreciate your feedback.

We have a few things coming up soon. A.B. 95 the anti confiscation law is set to receive it's first hearing in about a week.

Keep SECTION 11 on your daily "to do" list and let the legislators know that you're watching them!!
 
Buck,

Can you talk a bit more on A.B.s 91 and 191? My computer does not do the PDF thing very well, sorry.

How does 91 involve reloaders? What is or was at stake with this one?

And 191 just seems like a jerk law. So if I owned a business in a multi-unit building and had been there for years and the owner rents out a space for something as trivial as parking ticket hearings I could no longer carry in my own business?

What if one of the tenants was a gun store? What would happen then?

Thanks,

Warren
 
Warren:


A.B. 91 originally was written so that anyone wishing to obtain "explosives" would have had to register with the state government, have a permit, and be prohibited from purchasing some materials. In addition it originally listed virtually every chemical compound that could potentially go bang. It has been extensively revised/amended and now basically cites the federal law so that those in violation of federal law will also be in violation of state law. The federal law exempts "small arms ammunition and components thereof" and only restricts blackpowder purchase in excess of 50 pounds. As a result of the amendment, hobby reloaders are not affected.

A.B. 191 is a bad law as written. You are basically correct. If there is a court rented space in a 10 story building no one in the building would be allowed to carry concealed. If there was a court in a strip mall, no merchant could have a firearm for protection. I think you can see that it just goes too far. Apparently this was written in response to the courthouse shooting in Reno awhile ago. The circumstances around that shooting, however, have nothing to do with this POS.

Keep watching Section 11 for more updates. We must remain ever vigilant!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top