Well yes...people will always argue their superstitious beliefs...right to the grave, if need be. Barrel “Break In” has always been a contentious subject. One man believes 5 shots, clean with donkey pee, wait 14 minutes and repeat....While another believes 1 shot & clp/patch clean...2 shots & clp/patch clean...3 shots & clp/patch clean. Repeat 3 times & have at it.
With my metallurgical knowledge, I do not believe in special Barrel Conditioning, other than what normal shooting & cleaning will do. No special procedure is going to magically make make the surface of the steel any different from one way to another. Now I do realize that nothing said is going to change a man’s mind, what’s been doing the same procedure year in year out their entire life. No sir! And hey...that’s all fine and good. You think your “A-B-C*1,2,3*Do-Re-Mi” procedure, makes a difference over just shooting & cleaning... well cool! More power to ya! Afterall, everyone has equal opportunity of being wrong. But then, placebos can be very useful medicine to the INDIVIDUAL. Just not to the masses.
Remember also, any “break in” topic accounts ONLY for bare steel barrels.
When speaking of barrels using a Chrome lining or QPQ Nitriding, it becomes an irrevocable MOOT point! Hence, any kind of break in would take several THOUSAND rounds! This limits the entire discussion to bench & hunting rifles, using bare steel barrels for accuracy only. And we already know that the lifespan of such barrels are based on caliber, powder load & round count. Shoot, it’s pretty much down to a science at this point. A smaller bullet diameter, driven at higher speeds will be useful the least amount of rounds. Ever heard the term “Barrel Burner”? So it can be argued, when this is entered into the context, the discussion of barrel break is once again moot.