Hummer70
Member
https://www.ammoland.com/2018/03/bum...#axzz5B8aiHFuz
Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/03/bum...#ixzz5B8fmotrT
"Those decisions did not include extensive legal analysis relating to the definition of “machinegun.” Nonetheless, they indicated that semiautomatic firearms modified with these bump-stock-type devices did not fire “automatically,” and were thus not “machineguns,” because the devices did not rely on internal springs or similar mechanical parts to channel recoil energy. ATF has now determined that that conclusion does not reflect the best interpretation of the term “machinegun” under the GCA and NFA. In this proposed rule, the Department accordingly interprets the definition of “machinegun” to clarify that all bump-stock-type devices are “machineguns” under the GCA and NFA because they convert a semiautomatic firearm into a firearm that shoots automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger."
Under this definition all they have to do is design a bump fixture for ANY SEMI AUTO EVER MADE and since none are manually reloaded all can be so classified as machineguns. The bump stock requires several things,
1. the addition of the equipment.
2. rifle must be held loosely so it can freely move forward and the finger actuates the trigger for all follow on shots.
3. clamping a rifle in a hard mount or utilization of a sling that stops the free movement will cause an immediate stoppage.
4. the definition which seems to imply manual reloading is required is the operative term.here.
As indicated below just placing the trigger finger and thumb properly and holding the rifle so it can bounce forward will classify all SEMI AUTOS as a machineguns as obviously there is no manual reloading occurring. All semi auto pistols can be defined as a machinegun.
As well do a search of the word "manual" The definition of "manual" is defined "relating to or done with the hands."
Move quickly and write opposition to this proposal.
Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/03/bum...#ixzz5B8fmotrT
"Those decisions did not include extensive legal analysis relating to the definition of “machinegun.” Nonetheless, they indicated that semiautomatic firearms modified with these bump-stock-type devices did not fire “automatically,” and were thus not “machineguns,” because the devices did not rely on internal springs or similar mechanical parts to channel recoil energy. ATF has now determined that that conclusion does not reflect the best interpretation of the term “machinegun” under the GCA and NFA. In this proposed rule, the Department accordingly interprets the definition of “machinegun” to clarify that all bump-stock-type devices are “machineguns” under the GCA and NFA because they convert a semiautomatic firearm into a firearm that shoots automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger."
Under this definition all they have to do is design a bump fixture for ANY SEMI AUTO EVER MADE and since none are manually reloaded all can be so classified as machineguns. The bump stock requires several things,
1. the addition of the equipment.
2. rifle must be held loosely so it can freely move forward and the finger actuates the trigger for all follow on shots.
3. clamping a rifle in a hard mount or utilization of a sling that stops the free movement will cause an immediate stoppage.
4. the definition which seems to imply manual reloading is required is the operative term.here.
As indicated below just placing the trigger finger and thumb properly and holding the rifle so it can bounce forward will classify all SEMI AUTOS as a machineguns as obviously there is no manual reloading occurring. All semi auto pistols can be defined as a machinegun.
As well do a search of the word "manual" The definition of "manual" is defined "relating to or done with the hands."
Move quickly and write opposition to this proposal.
