cdb1
Member
I hunted almost exclusively with a .270 from 1972 until around 10 years ago. It is a great round and much more versatile than a 30-30. For me and me only I like a 30-30 better for hogs.
Less accurate? Where is the proof?
Longer case life?
I'm not knocking the 270 WSM, I'd very much like to have one with a 1:8 twist chambered in a long action and see what I could do with some of the very heavy for caliber bullets. But I don't know if it is inherently more accurate or has longer case life than the .270 Winchester. And it is certainly more prone to feed issues.
270 WSM makes sense in several ways.
1. It has less taper and longer case life.
2. It offers increased speed and energy over 270 Win.
3. It is a modern beltless magnum case design offering a short efficient powder column.
4. 270 WSM rifles are shorter, lighter, balance better, and are handier.
There is just no reason to go with a long skinny round, which is slower and less accurate.
And is only available in like 5 models of rifles
And takes 60-70 grains of powder
And has a shorter barrel life
And has more recoil
And is more expensive to shoot
And has spotty availability
270 is a fine hunting round.
270 wsm is neat and certainly works very well but I certainly can't see it usurping the 270 Winchester.
If anything, with today's powders, necking down a 308 case would be a better idea in my mind.
60-70 gr. Powder: You say that like it is a bad thing.
270 WSM is just flat superior to 270 Win. In every respect. I have been so impressed by mine, a Kimber, no looking back here.
You run into 270 Win fans, and I get that. But you can't ignore the increased performance, and decreased weight and size of the action.
You might not want the extra speed and energy. Some people do.
Feeding: this might be a problem in the living room, but not when cycling during real world hunting.
Some rifles will have a reduced capacity of 270 WSM by one cartridge. It is not a fault of the cartridge. It is due to the companies shoe horning it into current models.
Availability: It is called the Internet.
.mshootnit said:270 WSM is just flat superior to 270 Win. In every respect.
excellent choice! i love my x-bolt in 30-06 mine really likes a 168grain hornady sst over 57grains of IMR4350 if you don't handload its available in a hornady superformace factory load but they are rather pricey but do perform wellLots of good advice. Thanks to everyone. I went with an x bolt, simply because it felt the best. I really wanted to like something with wood furniture, but no other rifle I was able to shoulder pointed quite as naturally for me. It's in 30-06 mainly because that's what the x bolt was available in. Now to figure out the sighting situation.
60-70 gr. Powder: You say that like it is a bad thing.
270 WSM is just flat superior to 270 Win. In every respect. I have been so impressed by mine, a Kimber, no looking back here.
You run into 270 Win fans, and I get that. But you can't ignore the increased performance, and decreased weight and size of the action.
You might not want the extra speed and energy. Some people do.
Feeding: this might be a problem in the living room, but not when cycling during real world hunting.
Some rifles will have a reduced capacity of 270 WSM by one cartridge. It is not a fault of the cartridge. It is due to the companies shoe horning it into current models.
Availability: It is called the Internet.
What's over kill like? When you shoot something with a large caliber,
does it explode in flames and drift away with the wind? Or, does it
just die too quickly.
Zeke
Naw, it just dies BEFORE you shoot at it, and then you can't find it... Jk, usually more meat damage and a heavier, harder recoiling rifle...What's over kill like? When you shoot something with a large caliber,
does it explode in flames and drift away with the wind? Or, does it
just die too quickly.
Zeke
Nikon, Vortex, Leupold. My opinion, but I'm not a fan of the BDC reticle. I have them on two rifles. But neither rifle do I ever shoot past 100-125 yards. My choice would be Nikon Buckmaster, Vortex Diamondback, or Leupold VX-II in a flavor 3x9x40 or something close to it. And if they are available, a set of DNZ scope rings. Congrats on the new rifle.Definitely appreciate the advice on ammo selection. I don't hand load, yet, but will when I get everything set up. I'm researching optics at the moment, but ammo is up on the list. So much to do and so little time until November. I'm like a kid at Christmas right now.
Actually 223 is better than.
You were doing okay until you tacked on, "In every respect." That's just not true. I like both cartridges. Using your logic you could say the same thing about .223 vs 22-250, which isn't true either.
OK.
You were doing okay until you tacked on, "In every respect." That's just not true. I like both cartridges. Using your logic you could say the same thing about .223 vs 22-250, which isn't true either.