santacruzdave
Member
Anyone shoot any of these new bullets?
https://www.rmrbullets.com/shop/bullets/pistol/9mm-355/9mm-124-gr-rmr-jhp-mpr-nuke/
Last edited:
No, but I’d like to try it.
Sounds like a solid plan.I run the old MPRs at 1150 and they are very nice. Cant imagine these will be worse. Guess I better get shooting to use up the old MPRs!
Or 357 Sig.Load them in 38 super. I bet the mushroom is really impressive.
@longdayjake will the standard 124gr MPR be phased out in favor of the nuke?
Yes. In 115 and 124 grain. We are working on converting the older MPR machine to make a 135 and maybe a 147 grain bullet.
Alex, I'll take 147 gr for 100Yes. In 115 and 124 grain. We are working on converting the older MPR machine to make a 135 and maybe a 147 grain bullet.
I would happily choose rmr over everglades should he start putting out 158s with a canalureI ordered 500 right after my last post, last Thursday. They arrived yesterday morning. Excellent looking bullets. Didn't have time to measure and weigh, but I'm confident they will all be right on...
Now if Jake would design a 124 gr and a 158 gr JHP at .357" with a cannelure, I would probably get some for my 38 Specials and 357 Magnums.(working up loads for my Taurus 605).
My notes say 124 gr. XTP is .578".Does anyone have the OAL for the hornady xtp bullet? I’d like to compare OAL of RMR’s for comparison using the Hodgdon data. OAL of the cartridge is listed at 1.06 on hodgdon’s website for xtp bullet. I can load RMR’s to 1.068 (will probably use 1.065 so I can remember it easier). I plan on using CFE pistol to get a little higher velocity than hp-38.
I would just double check the plunk test. The bearing surfaces between the XTP and RMRs bullet are about .010" length of inch other.I measure .548 for the RMR bullet. So if my math is correct, I have more “room” in the case using the RMR bullet compared to XTP, if loaded to the same OAL. Should be safe to use hodgdon’s data starting at min and working up to desired velocity.