atek3
Member
After going to the range today, I propose a new rule (totally kidding), if someone's firearms are "tactical" they must spend at least 1/3rd of the sum value of their collection on training. I saw two groups of young patrons at the range today, each with many thousands of dollars of fine guns. Tricked out rem 870's, m1a's, wilson combat colts, and a whole lot of other good stuff. No training, no hunting, no competition. This guy with the wilson combat 1911, I really wanted to give him a few pointers but he looked several years older than me and pretty pumped about his 1911, so I didn't want to recommend he bring his feet closer together (they were roughly 3 feet apart from each other ). I asked them what they used the firearms for...going to the range and shooting paper. Forgive me for using the Front Sight terminology, but these folks were UI (unconciously incompetant), they had the right guns and the right gear, but no ability to use it! These guys were loaded so it wasn't a money issue, it was more of a "training, who needs it" issue. Anyone else met people like that?
atek3
atek3