Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

new unfired no1 mk3

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by paintballdude902, Mar 19, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. paintballdude902

    paintballdude902 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,872
  2. AT2

    AT2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    50
    IMHO if I had a truely unfired rifle that old I'd be selling it for WAY MORE than 700 bucks. But that may just be me being greedy.
     
  3. paintballdude902

    paintballdude902 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,872
    yeah i agree it just doesnt seem legit to me

    if you look at the back end of the receiver it looks like the parkerizing is either chipped or scratched
     
  4. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    I'm no expert on the No1 Enfields but aren't they oil blackened when manufactured? The only Enfield that was parkerized that I'm aware of is the real late Long Branches but maybe the Australian rifles were. The wood appears sanded to me, if it was an original I would think the seller would put up more photos and ask more money for it.

    Check at http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/, several Lithgow experts their.
     
  5. Aunt Bee

    Aunt Bee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    25
    Location:
    On the Chesapeake Bay near USNA, Annapolis, Maryla
    Some #1 Mk 3's made by Ishapore in the between Wars period were blued- I have one!
     
  6. DougW

    DougW Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,059
    Location:
    North Texas
    A 1945 Lithgow MIGHT be unfired. I would doubt the claim, as I agree with AT2 that an actual unfired rifle from WWII would be valued 3X the asking price. It could be legit, but I really doubt it. And, where is the Queen's Arsenal?
     
  7. GBExpat

    GBExpat Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,994
    Location:
    Rural, far beyond the beltway, Northern Virginia,
    Out of focus pics of auction firearms make me very leery.
     
  8. Limeyfellow

    Limeyfellow Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,394
    Location:
    NC, USA
    It been redone quite clearly. It doesn't have an aged Linseed coating on hence the lack of the red tint. The metal work coating is totally wrong for every Lithgow I owned, handled or read about, the markings have been clearly obliterated, including those you should easily see on the right side of the butt socket. I can't make out the serial code on the handle there. If anyone can determine that one it be pretty easy to tell when that part was at least made and where. The serial number also been obliterated from the receiver just before the barrel. No Lee Enfield would be made without the markings. It just not Commonwealth practice.

    What I suspect here is he parkerised the rifle, destroying the markings, sanded it down really smooth, and then stuck on a couple of coats of finish. The story attached to it is 99% sure is bs and any historical value of the rifle has been really damaged. Should still be a good shooter than if the barrel is good. Should be worth in the $150-200 region around here.
     
  9. DougW

    DougW Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,059
    Location:
    North Texas
    Pretty rifle though. My Lithgow (42) shows a lot of use, and the coachwood stock is pretty brittle. About the only Enfield I have that I have not fired.
     
  10. Birddog1911

    Birddog1911 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    624
    Location:
    Peyton, CO
    I notice that the "buyer" has only one rating...I suspect a shill bidder.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page