Thin Black Line
Member
Mmmm, having cake and eating it, too......
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0518rumsfeld0518.html
And, that two-week border AT in the Summer will prepare NG members for
their deployment to Iraq. Monty Burns says "Excellent!"
Did he list the NG's mission above in order of most importance? The
"overseas war fight" comes first for the NG? I guess he won't be able to
discuss this directly with Rumsfeld for clarification:
Translation: "I don't need to hear directly from the NG at the JCS."
LOL, we can start new humongous federal agencies every other month in
DC, but no one can find a FOLDING CHAIR for a NG General to sit down in
the same room with the rest of the JCS?! This is what we call "being out
of the loop."
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0518rumsfeld0518.html
Much of the hearing of the Senate Appropriations Committee's Defense subcommittee focused on Bush's decision earlier this week to place 6,000 National Guard soldiers on the U.S.-Mexican border. "It is not going to be a stress on the National Guard to do that function," Rumsfeld insisted. To the contrary, he said, "It will be beneficial to the Guard because they'll be doing the very same things they would be doing if they were training their two weeks on an exercise basis as opposed to doing something that the country really needs."
And, that two-week border AT in the Summer will prepare NG members for
their deployment to Iraq. Monty Burns says "Excellent!"
Army Lt. Gen. H. Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, who also appeared, emphasized that the new border mission will use only about 2 percent of the 445,000 troops in the Guard. "We have sufficient soldiers to do the overseas war fight, prepare for the upcoming hurricane season (TBL - like last year?), (and) still have the forces that we need to respond for terrorism in this country or a WMD event," Blum said.
Did he list the NG's mission above in order of most importance? The
"overseas war fight" comes first for the NG? I guess he won't be able to
discuss this directly with Rumsfeld for clarification:
On a related issue, Rumsfeld said he opposes giving the Guard a seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which has six members: the chairman, the vice chairman, and the chiefs of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force. Many lawmakers support an expansion, but Rumsfeld said that "the way we look at it is that the Army includes the total Army, and the Air Force the total Air Force, and that to begin to segment them inside the Joint Chiefs of Staff is not a good idea."
Translation: "I don't need to hear directly from the NG at the JCS."
LOL, we can start new humongous federal agencies every other month in
DC, but no one can find a FOLDING CHAIR for a NG General to sit down in
the same room with the rest of the JCS?! This is what we call "being out
of the loop."