Nightforce NXS 3.5-15x50mm F1 and AI AW 6.5 Creedmoor box test

Status
Not open for further replies.

MCMXI

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
9,233
Location
NW
taliv made a post about box testing a new rifle and scope back in August of 2014.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=759028

I now have a steel target at 1,050 yards so figured that I need to run a box test to see how the Nightforce 3.5-15x50mm F1 scope (now discontinued) on my AI AW tracks. The first thing I did was find the 30mm Horus Vision ASLI that had been in a box for five or six years. I "knew" that the scope and reticle were true to the rifle so I picked a vertical line in the house and mounted/alligned the Horus to the reticle. I then used a square and calipers to mark out a MIL RAD grid on a large piece of cardboard with the intention of dialing up 9.0 MIL and left/right 3.0 MIL. I used a foaming bore cleaner to clean the barrel since I was testing some Winchester (rubbish) 140 gr Match ammunition the previous week. I then headed out the door to my shooting bench with a box of Hornady 140gr A-MAX Match ammunition which has never shot worse than 0.6 moa out of the AI. I levelled the target at 100 yards and then figured I'd better adjust the zero because it was zeroed for my handloads that leave the barrel about 150 fps faster. The first shot (1) was close but shots (2) and (3) showed a shift probably due to some cleaner left in the barrel that affected the first shot. I adjusted the scope down 0.2 MIL and right 0.1 MIL and then proceeded to shoot the box test by dialing in the appropriate correction. In hindsight I should have adjusted the zero down 0.3 MIL rather than 0.2 MIL but overall I was very pleased with the results. I'm convinced that shot (8) was ammunition error. The shot felt good but hit high so when I was done with the test ending with shot (12) I dialed up 9.0 MIL and right 3.0 MIL resulting in the shot shown at (13). There were wind gusts from the left for a few of the shots, but considering the error from the load itself (+/- 0.3 moa), and the wind, I think that I've validated the scopes adjustments, the level on the scope and the relationship between the reticle, level and rifle. I'm amazed at how much I cant the rifle when I shoot it. The reticle looks way off when the bubble is in the center. :( Cant isn't a good thing at 1,000 yards+.

ai_aw_05.jpg

nf_nxs_6.5cm_box_test.jpg

1050_yard_target.jpg
 
Um, I don't think you did that box test right. If you send that scope to me I will test it FOR FREE on my .308. It may take me a couple months to make sure it's verified, but I will send it back to you (really, I promise).

Awesome set up and great shooting! I have a mil scope (lower end Leupold). Doing math in mil vs MOA is so much better when dialing.
 
cool, nice work!

you bring up an interesting issue regarding cant. I recommend that instead of leveling a scope on the rifle so that the rifle is true to the scope, that you use a plumb line.

essentially, if canting the rifle is comfortable for you, then cant it. just keep the scope level with the horizon/gravity. you'll shoot much more comfortably that way when you're not fighting the gun.
 
Peakbagger46, thanks very much. A matching reticle and adjustments really helps. At one time I had seven Leupold Mark 4 scopes with only one being MIL/MIL front focal. I sold two of them and bought a pair of Vortex MIL/MIL front focal scopes.

taliv, thanks for the feedback. Wouldn't canting the rifle to the scope result in a bullet trajectory that isn't entirely in a vertical plane? The barrel won't be entirely in a horizontal plane when the bullet leaves the muzzle so I would think that this would cause issues.
 
taken to extremes, yeah, if your height over bore is like 2.5" and you cant the gun to where the barrel is 1" left or right of the sights, then that could be an issue, unless you zeroed 1" off. but if we're only talking a few degrees... 10 degree cant would put you a bullet hole and a half off (.43") so as long as you zeroed off that amount, it would be parallel. if you didn't, it would be 4.3" off at 1000 yards.

compare that to a 1 degree error in cant, which would be 5" off at 1000 according to litz

a 1 degree error is not impossible when you're shooting in a hurry. if you're on a hill side and your target is on a hill side and you don't have a good frame of reference, when your head is leaning over disturbing your natural sense of level, it's pretty easy to get 3 to 5 degrees off even. 15-25" would put you off a full size ipsc at 1000 even if you got the wind perfect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top