Not legal in Cali

Status
Not open for further replies.
I understand that it costs a manufacturer around $3,000.00 to get a particular model approved (presuming that it can be approved at all). Therefore gun makers only submit their most popular and best selling models. In this case Taurus decided that stainless would sell better then blue, and didn't submit the blued version.

All of this is stupid of course, and makes no sense. But if you don't like it the Arizona border isn't that far away. We'd welcome you on our side of the line, and you could have any handgun you wanted.
 
It's tempting. The cost of living is less there, I believe I'd get paid more there. But there's something about living in Orange County. I surf after work (I work right next to the beach), the women are h-h-h-h-hot around here.

California needs reform.
I know, I'm beating a dead horse.
 
I understand ... :evil:

So you'll just have to be satisfied to own whatever guns the Democrats decide you can have. Maybe you'll even find that it's worth it.

As for myself, I have a different point of view ... :) :)
 
Every variation of a gun must be separately approved.

There are women outside of California, you know.
 
Justang ,

You should be carefull. Or you'll end up like my brother. He lives in Costa Mesa, 15 minutes from the beach. Hates it. He also believes that California's gun laws are normal. You should have seen his face when I told him the rest of the country wasn't like that.

To this day he can't understand why I won't move to CA and register all my guns.

Joe
 
the women are h-h-h-h-hot around here.
Click to expand...

Some of them are, but there are just as many that look like Ernest Borgnine in drag as there are anywhere else. I will say that silicone is very popular in the area and it looks REAL good. :D

I'm leaving Pendleton Thursday and heading back to Michigan by a circuitous route.
 
I've spent a fair amount of time in Arizona. And it looks like I'll be visiting there again in the near future.

I have always found that there are many "hot" women in Arizona as well.
And most of them are "factory original".
It seems like way too many California women, like California automobiles, have too many "modifications" or "added features".
 
But they don't make songs about Arizona women. Nope the song goes... "I wish they all could be California giiiiiiiirrrrlllls. :p
 
It seems like way too many California women, like California automobiles, have too many "modifications" or "added features".
Click to expand...
It's "added features" that you have to worry about - you know, the ones that were there before they became women? :uhoh:

The CA DOJ, specifically, one Bill Lockyer http://caag.state.ca.us/ will do whatever it can to make private firearms ownership as difficult and painful as possible. Doesn't have to have any other purpose than to punish gunowners. Meanwhile, the cities are, for the most part, cesspools of crime and perversion with gangs running the streets.
 
My guns are not worth stretches of hot sand against undrinkable water, populated by what might be women in skimpy outifts. My rights are more important than a bunch of beach bunnies that aren't going home with me anyway, considering my wife is heavily armed as well.....
We have lots of beach out here in AZ - just no water. Actualy, Northern AZ has some nice lakes, I'm told; I never went. We do have excellent gun laws, just need to get rid of the property taxes, and we'll be darn near perfect. Where else do we have frearm education allowed in public schools, with range time being the passing requirements?
 
Armoredman has finally hit the nail on the head.


I realize that for some people there are more important things than firearms. I myself have a couple of higher priorities.

I often hear people say that they love to live where they do because of all sorts of reasons. From the economy, to the climate, to the scenery.
It's almost the same excuses people give for choosing a political candidate based on their stance on non-gun, non-sporting issues.

But what, I feel, these people are overlooking is that any state or any person that will ignore or attempt to dilute any portion of The Constitution or The Bill of Rights simply cannot be trusted to uphold the remainder. Hells Bells™ it/they shouldn't even be expected to do so.

How many sun-worshipping, beach bunny ogling, California men would be willing to give up their right to free speech for the pleasure of watching a woman, with plastic mammary glands partially stuffed into a tank top, flirt with a bald man driving a Mercedes convertible?

How many melanoma-endangered California women would be willing to trade their right to vote for the luxury to parade around in a thong bikini on an overcrowded beach 342 days per year?
Sadly I suspect the real answer, to this last question, would be, "Most of them", since I'll wager that less than 50% of them vote at all and that the vast majority of those who do, know nothing more about the persons they voted for than what they "learned" from a TV commercial.


After all, isn't the ability to obsess over a 38DDD much more important than the right to possess a .50BMG?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top