and I'll second that welcome from St. Johns
and add more to the profile--I don't think you'll get harassment if you do.
FWIW, my grandfather emigrated from Birdlip in the 1870s. He had no opportunity for land ownership, and he wanted to farm. (Actually, he really just wanted to hunt--why else would he have sold a farm near Redwood Falls, MN, where the soil is some of the best anywhere, and move to a farm near Warroad, MN--where the growing season was a month shorter--but the deer were plentiful.)
One of the real issues for us here in the US in understanding English culture and law, I think, is that we often have no more than stereotypes, some of which are simply political cant, to know more of the UK culture in issues such as these.
I've read St.John's comments as much as I can to gain insight into the current culture regarding firearms--and I'd like to learn more.
From where I live, I would rather have my (nominal) fifty guns in my own gun safe, and my S&W HP special with Hydro-Shoks in the bedside table, or the S&W 4069 in the other bedside table--and the Benelli Super 90 in the closet, and know I will probably not be arrested for dispatching an intruder.
To deal with one of those stereotypes, then, as we have been doing--then I think I need more of a set of citations showing that self-defense by the average UK (British?) subject is not unduly hindered by a complex set of law subject to political interpretation.