NRA statement about false S.1805 rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeHaas

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
291
THIS IS FROM NRA-HQ --- PLEASE CIRCULATE
====================================

Recent Internet alerts from some "pro-Second Amendment" groups have suggested that the National Rifle Association has either accepted a compromise that would include reenactment of the 1994 Clinton Gun ban and/or the McCain-Reed gun show restrictions, or will not actively fight against their passage in the Senate. Not only are these claims completely false and ridiculous but they are also extremely counterproductive to our legislative strategy and agenda. Gun control groups are spreading the same rumors in hopes of confusing pro-gun senators as to our position in hopes of gaining their support.

The National Rifle Association led the fight in opposition to this ill-conceived ban in 1994, led the efforts to repeal the ban two years later, and is leading the fight to ensure the Clinton gun ban expires on time on September 13. From public speeches, articles in NRA publications, communications to lawmakers and the development of a website (http://www.ClintonGunBan.com/), the National Rifle Association has been vocal and unambiguous about our position on this issue.

It is our hope that supposed "friends of the Second Amendment" will cease to provide ammunition to the enemy by disseminating this false information. Unfortunately, some of these groups seem intent on finding or creating any excuse to defeat S. 1805, perhaps because its passage has been a priority of the NRA for four years. The anti-gunners are seeking to undermine the Second Amendment and the legislative process by seeking to bankrupt firearms and ammunition manufacturers or get gun control restrictions through the courts through dozens of pending municipal lawsuits -- blaming the gun industry for the acts of criminals -- initiated by anti-gun big city mayors and greedy trial lawyers. A single judgment by a rogue judge or jury could wipe out the entire firearms industry making our gun rights worthless. Passage of S. 1805 is critical -- but not worth allowing legislation going to the President including either an extension of the Clinton gun ban or restrictions at gun shows. There will be no compromise. The only choice is a "clean" bill or no bill.

The legislative process in Congress is complex and far from perfect. Fortunately, Congress is a bicameral (two house) legislative body and both the House and Senate must agree on the same bill before enactment. While we are uncertain of the outcome of several pending anti-gun amendments in the Senate, the House is strongly pro-gun and it (or a conference committee) will not accept any anti-gun Senate-passed amendment as part of the final product to be sent to the President.

Pro-gun grassroots activists who want to advance our cause should not be distracted by misinformation and disinformation by our "friends." Instead, gun owners and sportsmen must keep our focus on the real action and contact -- by calls, e-mails, and faxes -- their two U.S. Senators urging them to vote for S. 1805 and against any and all anti-gun "poison pill" killer amendments including, but not limited to, the Clinton gun ban and gun shows. Use the "Write Your Representatives" (http://www.capwiz.com/nra/home/) tool at www.NRAILA.org to contact your Senators and call them at 202-224-3121. We appreciate your active support in our cause to defend the Second Amendment and freedom itself.

National Rifle Association
 
While we are uncertain of the outcome of several pending anti-gun amendments in the Senate, the House is strongly pro-gun and it (or a conference committee) will not accept any anti-gun Senate-passed amendment as part of the final product to be sent to the President.

That's a very strong statement there, and kinda mirrors what I've thought, that the place where this is going to be fought is in the House, not the Senate.

Btw, the Craig Ammo ban that everyone's up in arms about is this:

1. A two year study by the DOJ about what exactly constitutes armor piercing (which is Washingtonese for "dead in the water").

2. 15 year federal sentence for using an armor piercing bullet in a crime. Now, we're not talking about your typical rifle ammo...armor piercing ammunition is very strictly defined in federal statute as special kinds of bullets with special kinds of materials (like depleted uranium or tungsten) and not even available for sale to the general public anyway. It was a throwaway issue to the Kennedy amendment just like the banning on nonexistant plastic handguns. :p

KABA is going nuts going after the NRA and stuff on this issue, which is STUPID. Besides, it's certainly possible that the House will strip the second part out of the bill and just leave the study.

NRA must have some very good assurances from people very high up (that is Tom Delay and Denny Hastert) in the House to be that confident. Plus the White House has already stated that they want a clean bill or else, no AWB renewals or any of that BS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top