Speedo66
Member
This was the case where NYC told holders of "premises" permits they could only remove their handgun from their home to practice at one of seven ranges in NYC, and could not take them out of the city to another range or a second home.
Once appeals were filed to SCOTUS, the city changed their laws as they knew it was a loser, and wanted the case declared moot. The court said no, and will start proceedings there today.
The court hasn't taken on a gun rights case in about a decade, some attribute its change to the current composition of the court. Many feel gun rights have been trampled in the interim.
Here is an article about it: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/02/us/guns-supreme-court.html
Once appeals were filed to SCOTUS, the city changed their laws as they knew it was a loser, and wanted the case declared moot. The court said no, and will start proceedings there today.
The court hasn't taken on a gun rights case in about a decade, some attribute its change to the current composition of the court. Many feel gun rights have been trampled in the interim.
Here is an article about it: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/02/us/guns-supreme-court.html