(OH) Open Carry Leads To Felony Traffic Stop; Suspended License

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Open Carry Leads To Felony Traffic Stop; Suspended License
Written by Jeff Garvas
Monday, 05 June 2006

Many gun owners fear that Ohio's open carry requirements in a car are going to get someone killed one day. Just last week, another incident played out that demonstrates just how dangerous the mindset of "man with a gun equals criminal" could be for law abiding gun owners.

Recently, a concealed handgun license holder was pulled over in Oregon, Ohio (near Toledo) after leaving a gas station. He was ordered out of his vehicle by police conducting a "felony traffic stop", eventually had to crawl out of his window (his doors were locked and he was ordered to keep his hands in sight, rendering it impossible to unlock them), and was ordered to the ground while being held at gunpoint. His crime? Carrying a gun lawfully.

During the ordeal, this man had attempted to advise the police that he was a concealed handgun license holder, but they were unable to hear him. Surely their adrenaline was pumping (this was a man-with-a-gun call), but the facts of the incident should have seemed to not add up to a crime in progress. A man had walked in and out of an establishment while carrying two firearms openly on his hips, but he didn't rob the place, paid for his purchases, and left without harming or threatening anyone.

Oregon police chose to cite Dan Sayers with failure to notify the police that he was a license holder and was carrying at the time, a misdemeanor of the fourth degree, despite the fact that the police report clearly indicates they couldn't hear what he was saying during the encounter.

This story, however, takes a turn for the worse: the police also charged Sayers with possession of a firearm in public, a first degree misdemeanor, despite the fact that the State of Ohio has licensed Sayers to carry a firearm for his self-defense.

The Oregon, Ohio ordinance says nothing of concealed or openly carried, it simply prohibits possession or carrying of a firearm in public. This is a complete ban on firearms in the Oregon community in direct conflict with both Ohio's Constitution and Ohio's concealed carry laws -- and OFCC will work with Sayers to see this matter resolved.

Local governments overstep home rule police power authority when they start to prohibit ownership, possession, and the lawful carrying of firearms.

Ohioans For Concealed Carry has been working with Sayers since the ordeal took place and we are going to follow this case very closely. The Sayers case is very similar to Patrick Feely, who was arrested for carrying concealed prior to HB12 becoming law in Ohio. Both men work in Pizza delivery, and like Feely, Sayers delivers in some of the worst parts of town.

Sadly, the County Sheriff's office has suspended Sayers' CHL, and his firearms have been confiscated by the police department. Despite our best efforts, we have not been able to identify what authorized the Sheriff's department to revoke Sayers' license. To the best of our knowledge he has not been indicted or convicted of a crime.

Ohioans For Concealed Carry referred Mr. Sayers to a Toledo attorney assisting the organization in our lawsuit against the City of Clyde, where "no guns allowed" signs were illegally posted at entrances to their city parks. We are continuing to investigate the Sayers case, and will be assisting Mr. Sayers the best we can as this case progresses through the courts.

This case threatens to create a dangerous precendent for Ohio CHL holders. Regardless of the fact that this city ordinance represents the kind of patchwork quilt of gun laws that currently exist at local levels (and for which no gun owner could resonably be expected to be aware of), there is an even greater danger. This could set the precedent for any CHL holder who accidentally unconceals his or her firearm, or who is in the process of complying with the "open carry in a motor vehicle" requirement of the law, to be subject to being charged with a crime. We will continue to work to keep Ohio gunowners safe from such abuses.

We will continue to keep our members and supporters updated as this case unfolds.

http://www.ohioccw.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3613&Itemid=83
 
It sort of reminds me of the guy that got arrested down here that was legally carrying and was told by the police that they didn't care what the law or the supreme court said they weren't going to have people running around with guns.

Open carry would be nice especially during hot months and it completely legal here in Louisiana, but chances are the least that would happen would be a lot of police harassment.
 
This is retarded. I don't blame the actions of the cops... they have limited knowledge of a situation when they get on scene and have to react as if in a worst case scenario. However, if they really cared about the RKBA or CCW cause, they could have not charged the guy.... maybe read him the riot act about paranoid gas station clerks.

This merely proves that the open sight restriction on our CCW law only causes problems. Furthermore, it proves how our society fears guns... clerk sees someone with a gun, person is not doing anything wrong, but decides to call the cops anyway. Utterly irresponsible.
 
police support RKBA?

You can put this one in the..."He can't have a gun. Only WE can have guns..." category.

How many cops will tell you that they DON"T have that attitude. The same ones will turn around and treat a citizen exactly as these guys did.

"Man with a gun" translates "oooh oooh let me do him!"

Then, once they realize they don't have a case, they start thinking, "...well what can we charge him with? We can charge him with sumpthin...right?"
 
This is retarded. I don't blame the actions of the cops...

I blame them, at several levels.

The police unions and administrations were warned that something like this would happen. They poo-pooed it. The police lobbied for these anti-gun rights laws and ordinances -- insisted on them, in many cases.

And now we have them pressing these pathetic charges.

A pox on them.

Rick
 
The original incident was definitely upsetting but forgiveable under the circumstances. But to follow up by pressing ridiculous charges, confiscating his firearms, and then the sheriff suspends his CHL? Disgusting.

With any luck, the victim will end up quite wealthy after all the lawsuits are finished.
 
What would be the difference???

In this case what would be the difference - go ahead and carry w/out the proper paperwork, and it's only paperwork. Or go through proper protocol and carry what you want when you want? It looks as if the outcome is the same. What good are the laws if every Barny Fife w/ a badge is going to interpret the law selectively as he wants, when he wants? :banghead:
 
There is a rabid anti-gun mentality in NE Ohio (Toledo area) and northern Ohio in general. :banghead: I hope that these [non high road words omitted] are slapped into reality by the courts soon.
 
I don't blame the police for shaking down a peaceable man with a gun any more than I would blame them for running a peaceable black man out of town.

It's the same thing.
 
If the guy actually broke the law, he's in bad shape.

If on the other hand the story is true as written, and no valid laws were broken, (Does the Ohio concealed handgun law pre-empt local bans?) then the officers who took his firearms ought to be prosecuted for armed robbery (he WAS held at gunpoint) and the sheriff and DA ought to be brought up on conspiracy charges.

The chances of that happening? I predict something on the order of "zero."

The fact that no punitive action will be taken against the LEOs involved in this (apparently) wrongful action even if/when charges are dropped and the man's license and guns are returned is why we have LEO bashing threads - even when they screw up badly, there are usually no consequences.
 
Does the Ohio concealed handgun law pre-empt local bans?
Yes.
then the officers who took his firearms ought to be prosecuted for armed robbery (he WAS held at gunpoint) and the sheriff and DA ought to be brought up on conspiracy charges.
Up to the discretion of the local prosecutor. Will never happen in this anti-gun utopia.

The fact that no punitive action will be taken against the LEOs involved in this (apparently) wrongful action even if/when charges are dropped and the man's license and guns are returned is why we have LEO bashing threads - even when they screw up badly, there are usually no consequences.
Unleash the assault lawyers!

Lawsuits in which there is no chance of prevailing on the law or facts are filed every day for the purpose of forcing social or corporate change. Leftists have been successfully doing this for decades now. They have be abetted by leftist judges more recently, but such a conspiracy is not mandatory.
 
What is the law?

When I went for my CCW training, the instructor (a 20 year LE veteran) said nobody knows what the law for carrying in a car is.:uhoh:

That scares me more than anything. I have asked several LE, including the deputy who processed my CCW application, how the law is interpreted in carrying in a car, and they all say, "It's up to the individual officer!" DUH!

I'm a middle-aged woman who was driving an older woman home one day when my car died (common occurrence for me) and I pulled off to the side to call for a tow. Cleveland Police ran my plates before they even approached my car, and because I knew I had a gun with me, I kept my hands on the steering wheel. Before I could tell them I was a CHL, I heard the dispatcher tell the officer that. I confirmed the CHL info for the officer. While waiting for the tow truck, THREE CPD cars were sitting behind me with their lights on.:banghead:

My passenger asked me why there were so many police cars behind us and I replied that they must be concerned for the citizens of their city to protect them from me.

My biggest fear, though, of being arrested for violating the law in some way, or of being shot for being armed did not come to pass thankfully.

Thanks for the info also on the Ohio CCW site.:)
 
Heaven forbid that cops should KNOW THE LAW.... I mean they are not spending time at the range.

During this whole time the retards in blue (or gray or whatever color uniform they wear) didn't call in a supervisor?

Even as a lowly Corrections Officer I had to read post orders, maintain proficiency on DOC policy etc etc etc... and when something as critical as handgun laws are concerned they recieve no training?

The cops are at fault. But so many believe that they are the 'good guys' that nothing more than a smack on the wrist will come of this.
 
"I'm going home to my Family at the end of the day."

isn't just a mantra for the boys in blue. It's for all of us.
If you want to live through a traffic stop, then you'll crawl out of the window. You'll smile and say "yes, sir." to questions about your legally purchased, documented, weapon and your need to have a concealed carry weapon.
Otherwise, you may get pumped full of lead on the side of the road.

But, don't worry, you'll get your day in court where you'll be railroaded, but allowed to spend thousands of dollars in attorney and court fees asserting rights you shouldn't have to assert.

There are good cops and there are bad cops. You never know which one you've run into when you have a CHL, so better to err on the side of caution because "They're going home at the end of their shift, no matter what."
 
This has been a huge problem in Ohio since we got CCW in 2004. Solution is to pass HB 347 and get a governor who will sign it. I urge all Buckeyes to support Ken Blackwell he has pledged to help us fix our flawed law.
 
stops and checks

I was parked at the side of the road out in the county. Cop pulls up behind me and when he finds out I'm legally carrying with a permit, I don't think he really knew what to do with it. I spent half an hour sitting in his patrol car while he stood behind it. First a long conversation on his personal radio. Then a few more questions for me. Then an even longer chat on his cell phone. More questions for me. Another long chat on his personal radio. Finally sent me on my way, didn't really hassle me, but we wasted at least half an hour while he was on the horn. I had the feeling that if I had left an "i" uncrossed or a "t" undotted I would have had trouble.

One or two dumb questions. He asked me where I was going and what I was planning to do when I got there. Later he asked me why I told him that. Duh! Like you asked me!
 
One or two dumb questions. He asked me where I was going and what I was planning to do when I got there. Later he asked me why I told him that. Duh! Like you asked me!
Texas recently revised it's "Traveling" law regarding possession of a firearm by persons NOT possessing a CHL. TSRA found out that down around Houston (?) some local yokels decided they were going to play games with the language and intent of the law, so the advice given was . . . if you're asked where you've been or where you're going, you answer the LEO with words to the effect of "Officer, legal counsel advises that everything you need to know is on that card" while pointing at your driver's license.
 
Drizzt said:
He was ordered out of his vehicle by police conducting a "felony traffic stop", eventually had to crawl out of his window (his doors were locked and he was ordered to keep his hands in sight, rendering it impossible to unlock them), and was ordered to the ground while being held at gunpoint.
This may be a stupid question, but what if he was following ALL the traffic rules, i.e. using his seat belt. How could he have even complied with the order to climb out of the window? (He had to keep his hands in sight eliminating the ability to unlock his seat belt.) Yet he was not cited for that. Why? They heaped up a bunch of other idiotic charges, why did they leave out that one? It may have been the only one legally chargeable.

This whole ordeal reeks with STUPIDITY! (on the part of the LEOs)
 
Yes, but I was just trying to be a nice guy and not rock the boat. No point in aggrevating them. When you're walking down the side walk the dog in that yard may not be entitled to run out and bite you, but you don't go out of your way to aggrevate him.
 
Tell the Cops that ignorance of the Law applies to them also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top