This is what happened originally in Ohio. For many years, Ohio did not have a CCW licensing law, or permit concealed weapons, with the exclusion of an "affirmative defense", which is a bass-akwards take on requiring the accused to "make his case" for having a concealed weapon (i.e., valid reason), and then the jury decides if it is valid enough to find him innocent. That law put the burden of proof, and expense, on any one that was caught with a concealed weapon, even if they had been threatened, assaulted, etc. Then, after much prodding by pro-gun forces, and the trend toward violence in our society and the fact that 40 some other states already having CCW laws in place, Ohio lawmakers felt a little left out, and decided it was time to ratify a much kicked around and re-written CCW law. Lawmakers asked for input from the Buckeye Sheriffs Assn, the Ohio State Patrol, Attorney General, etc. The problem was, none of these high falootin' public institutions had any direct experience WITH a CCW law, or its enforcement. They could have contacted other states similar to Ohio, and asked, "Hey, what do you guys do?" But instead, they asked the state patrol, and Ohio ended up with a convoluted "gun must be concealed when anywhere EXCEPT when riding in a vehicle, where upon being stopped by a LE officer, the officer must be able to see the gun in a holster on the person, etc". Now how a CCW carrier was supposed to keep it concealed, then transition to basically open carry in the car, etc, they didn't explain. This created all sorts of problems and "interpretations" by cops, chiefs, staties, etc, and finally the matter of vehicle transport, visible, blah, blah, had to be revised (with a few other things). Some cops were very good at using discretion, others not so much. Now they are addressing the fact that possibly 50% of the places one might frequent in the public for food, etc, have alcohol. As mentioned, many other progressive states have had CCW laws for years, have already sorted this stuff out, and Ohio could have saved a lot of time, money, and retraining of cops, etc, if they had done their homework to begin with. I have policed (now retired), in several different states, and have made it a point to become familiar with the CCW laws in those and several others. Ohio lawmakers had become convinced that many serious problems either would or might occur if they gave the citizens CCW this way or that way, but to date, only a very small percentage of ANY problems has occurred. The results of the brief training and education of Ohio's CCW citizens course has apparently been a success, and the lawmakers concerns unjustified. Now let's see if Ohioans can behave in restaurants serving liquor, as other state citizens already do. I think we'll do o.k. Ohio also wants to have more reciprocity with the other states who have CCW, and several of those states would not give Ohio reciprocity until Ohio sorted out some of the dumb rules and stipulations of the original, poorly researched CCW law. Now that that is being done, we might see several states get on board for reciprocity.