ok to shoot +p in non +p gun?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Frank1991

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
70
Looking to buy a new in box model 37 with an older frame (not +p rated and probably from the mid 90's). Would it be ok to occasionally shoot +p .38 ammo in this gun (maybe 25 rounds a year)?
 
It probably wouldn't hurt it, but why stress the gun? There's not an appreciable amount of difference in recoil between the two that you would need to actually practice with the +p to be proficient. I would use the standard .38spl for practice and just carry the +p's. Maybe shoot a cyclinder of the +p's if it makes you feel better, but not on a regular basis.
 
Shoot enough to confirm POI with your chosen load and practice with standard pressure.

Recoil and POI is close enough between standard and +P for it not to be an issue with practice. In my M37, the +P hit about an inch or two lower, but in my old M36 (also not +P rated), the two POIs were the same.

FWIW, I put 10rounds of +P 158gr LSWC-HP through my M37 at it's first range trip and I can't tell at all that it loosened it up at all. Since I want to check two other loads, I'll probably end up shooting 5-10 of each and then only shoot +p VERY rarely, maybe 5 rounds a year. The rest of my shooting will be with standard pressure ammo.

Chris
 
BTW, there's roughly 2000psi difference in chamber pressure between Standard and +P (loads from Corbon and Buffalo Bore might take it a bit further). That's not much. You can have a variance larger than that just from factors such as powder measure fluctuations, brass thickness, and bullet seating depth.

Chris
 
In the past I would've said go for it, but I've recently changed my opionion. A limited amount of +P shouldn't blow up the gun, but it will accelerate wear. Someday it will need a trip to the gunsmith. I'd use a non +P Safestop www.safestop.net 148 gr. cup faced, plated wadcutter which does about 700 fps from a 2" barrel. It ain't cheap, because if you have one 50-round box delivered it figures to about $.96 per round. I used to own a model 37. I had some 158 gr. lead semi-wadcutters that did 700 fps from it's 2" barrel. Anything more than that was hard to control. Or, use non +P Federal/Remington 158 gr. lead semi-wadcutter. Either should give good penetration. (If I wanted to use +P in an airweight then I'd probaby use the Remington Golden Saber 125 gr.)
 
Last edited:
I am one of the few who has long argued that factory +P is really nothing to write home about but I am just a bit leery of guns with alloy frames. I don't like to carry ammo that I don't practice with so I don't recommend +P in alloy guns. Many do it without harm but alloy gives me the willys. That's why I don't own any alloy revolvers. I prefer a few more ounces of weight and the peace of mind that comes with tempered steel.
 
It would take quite a bit of shooting, even in a not +P rated gun, to get it loosened up much. I wouldn't and don't worry about it. I shoot a Taurus +P rated gun with an alloy frame and carry +P. I shoot 158 grain SWC for practice and notice, actually, a little more recoil with the standard SWC stuff! The +P I'm using is Speer's 135 grain bullet. The 158 causes more recoil force. It shoots higher, about the only reason I can see for switching. I buy 130 round nose ball occasionally. It's not quite as accurate in my revolver, but the POI is a lot closer to my carry load. I've been thinking I'll just start practicing with that. I worry more about remembering sight picture than I do from the piddlin' recoil of a .38 load.
 
Why batter the piece with extensive use of high-pressure loads? What's that going to prove? Buy a revolver that's rated for the cartridge and be done with it.

Scott
 
gunfan said:
Why batter the piece with extensive use of high-pressure loads? What's that going to prove? Buy a revolver that's rated for the cartridge and be done with it.
Who said anything about battering the gun with extensive use. I think the general consensus was to shoot just enough to confirm your POI and practice with standard pressure loads.

Chris
 
Standing Wolf said:
I wouldn't. I think it makes more sense to buy the right gun than stress the wrong one.
That's part of the problem. We're getting mixed signals from S&W about the suitability. I've been told by S&W that the M37 IS +P rated. Frank1991 has heard the opposite.

Chris
 
Ask yourself whether you would shoot Cor-Bon full power .45 Colt ammunition in a first generation blackpowder Colt Single Action Army.
If the answer is 'No that would be stupid.' then you have the answer as to whether it is prudent to fire +P ammunition in a non +P rated revolver.
 
Onmilo said:
Ask yourself whether you would shoot Cor-Bon full power .45 Colt ammunition in a first generation blackpowder Colt Single Action Army.
If the answer is 'No that would be stupid.' then you have the answer as to whether it is prudent to fire +P ammunition in a non +P rated revolver.
That's not anywhere close to the same pressure difference. +P 38special is roughly only 2k PSI more than standard. "Ruger" level 45Colt ammo develops roughly twice the pressure of standard pressure 45Colt (12k vs 25k). Not to mention that a First Gen BP Colt is significantly different than modern single action guns in stength. That's like running 357mag in a 38special.

Chris
 
That's part of the problem. We're getting mixed signals from S&W about the suitability. I've been told by S&W that the M37 IS +P rated. Frank1991 has heard the opposite.
The problem is you are asking about the new standard production M37 which is built on the new J-Magnum frame and is +P rated. Frank1991 is talking about a revolver that was built on the old J-frame that wasn't +P rated. The same named revolver, but built on 2 different frames. In 1997 with the M37-3 they went to a bigger stronger frame.
 
i have an early 1990's S & W model 38 alloy that is not +P rated - I have put a few +P rounds through it with no problems but, I have a friend who tried some +P's in an older Taurus model 85 and it jammed up on him...he said that after firing the +P the cylinder would not turn...He managed to get it open and after that it was ok with regular .38's.

I think the issue is the way the cylinder latches ... don't the +P newer models have a different (multiple?) latch system for the cylinder?
 
Majic said:
The problem is you are asking about the new standard production M37 which is built on the new J-Magnum frame and is +P rated. Frank1991 is talking about a revolver that was built on the old J-frame that wasn't +P rated. The same named revolver, but built on 2 different frames. In 1997 with the M37-3 they went to a bigger stronger frame.
Um, no, we're talking about the same revolver. I bought one of the ones he's referring to. I also contacted S&W and gave them both the serial number and the distributor's name.

Chris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top