AABEN
Member
I carry my Bersa at times that is what I would hope to have on me it is 16+ I carry it when I go to big city I also carry my S&W Md 12 some time a round home.
Old Quality vs New Cheap Functionality
- Thread starter HGM22
- Start date
- Status
Sunray
Member
If I knew I'd be attacked and you went wherever anyway you need to rethink the places you go. And learn to carry a rifle. snicker.
Makes no difference what you have as long as you have it and you can shoot it well enough.
Absolutely would not want a police trade-in S&W Model 10 that is as it came from the PD.
Makes no difference what you have as long as you have it and you can shoot it well enough.
Absolutely would not want a police trade-in S&W Model 10 that is as it came from the PD.
bluestarlizzard
Member
Do I get to take it home after the bizarre hypothetical? Because if so, the old quality.
If I don't get to keep it... meh, I think I'd still take the old quality.
If I don't get to keep it... meh, I think I'd still take the old quality.
huntsman
Member
Well if you leave out the whole attack thing then what you're asking is which cheap gun, one from the past or one from the present?
A cheap gun is a cheap gun if it's all you can afford then so be it.
I'll take the Blaster over the light saber every time for SD.
A cheap gun is a cheap gun if it's all you can afford then so be it.
I'll take the Blaster over the light saber every time for SD.
Sam1911
Moderator Emeritus
Absolutely TRUE! Unless it's the other way around. One or the other, for sure!
km101
Member
If I KNEW I would be attacked by multiple assailants..........I would be carrying a M249 SAW and not a handgun of any type!
But if limited to the above choices I would go with the M10. I have trained and competed with revolvers for years and would be comfortable with it, and so would be more likely to be effective with it.
And if you take out the first couple of attackers it tends to take the aggression out of the rest, so capacity (to me) does not matter as much as accuracy and reliability.
But if limited to the above choices I would go with the M10. I have trained and competed with revolvers for years and would be comfortable with it, and so would be more likely to be effective with it.
And if you take out the first couple of attackers it tends to take the aggression out of the rest, so capacity (to me) does not matter as much as accuracy and reliability.
Thats your assumption.
It reminds me of a martial instructional video where the narrator says during a multiple person attack reenactment" see how the agressor backs away as xyz does this and this move."
If you want to tie one hand behind your back go ahead but I think it is bad advice.
It reminds me of a martial instructional video where the narrator says during a multiple person attack reenactment" see how the agressor backs away as xyz does this and this move."
If you want to tie one hand behind your back go ahead but I think it is bad advice.
Zaydok Allen
Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 13,275
This question makes little sense. If you are being attacked by multiple attackers, of course you want a gun with higher capacity than a six shooter.
But those of us that carry a revolver, or a lower capacity semi auto believe it is unlikely that we will be attacked by multiple aggressors.
So forget the question posted above, and buy a high quality gun, and carry one with enough capacity to make you feel comfortable. Or better yet, move to a safer area.
But those of us that carry a revolver, or a lower capacity semi auto believe it is unlikely that we will be attacked by multiple aggressors.
So forget the question posted above, and buy a high quality gun, and carry one with enough capacity to make you feel comfortable. Or better yet, move to a safer area.
Pudge
Member
Would anyone's response change if they knew they were only going to be attacked by a single person?
not one bit
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
- Locked
- Locked
