Old S&W Model 60 .38 Special

Status
Not open for further replies.

Confederate

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
3,402
Location
Arlington, VA
My father left me one of these very nice revolvers with no pinned barrel, but with hard chromed hammer and trigger. My problem is finding a good defensive round for the gun, since it can't take +P. People say, just get the FBI load. First, this load is almost impossible to find, it's insanely expensive plus, let's face it, it's a 2-inch barrel!

I just bought some American Eagle .38 Spc 130-gr FMJ. That should give me penetration, but no expansion. Does anyone know how this gun would hold up with +P loads for defense only? Georgia Arms has a so-called FBI load, but when tested to the tried-and-true brand, even though it looked the same, weighed the same and had similar velocities, the Georgia Arms version just didn't expand, even from longer barrels. And doesn't someone come out with two versions of that load, +P and standard?

I've never fired anything in this gun and my dad only checked it out when he first got it years ago. I also have a VERY nice Rossi version of the same gun, only with a 3-inch barrel and much better sights. I've never fired it so it looks like it just came from the factory. Not even a test load. That said, I did fire its twin brother, but used mostly SWCs. Then, at the end, I fired five +P loads, 125gr JHPs, I think. It barked a bit louder but was easily controlled. I later carried it as a pocket gun and even used it to extract myself (and a girlfriend) from a very dicey situation in Washington, D.C. Having had the crap beaten out of me a few years earlier, I can say with conviction that having a gun makes all the difference in a confrontation. Even though there were more potential assistants than bullets, the adage about no one wanting to be shot ruled the situation. But still I would like my ammo to be effective. At the time I had Glaser blue-tips, but now, what is the old Model 60 capable of? Or should it just be retired as obsolete?

BTW, the Model 60 and the Rossi 88 seem to have almost identical specifications and measurements. Compared side-by-side, I made notes of the differences. The Rossi has a stainless trigger and hammer. Cylinder appears identical except for notches, which are in the same places and about the same depth. Topstrap and trigger guard also appear to have the same thickness and shape, but the cylinder ejector on the Rossi, while fully functional, lacks the quality of the Smith's ejector, which tends to be a bit thicker and better machined. On the plus side of the Rossi, the hammer is wider, making it easier to cock and uncock. The sights also are superior and allow for windage adjustments. And, finally, the smaller barrel on the 60 gives the gun exceptional feel and balance. At the same time, the 3-inch barrel is better when any distance is needed.

Overall, I was impressed by the look and feel of both guns and can more fully understand why the 60 was so expensive and sought after. But their inability to shoot +P makes them both almost obsolete. I asked someone from Smith & Wesson once about shooting +P in the 60 just for defense and he just gave me the official answer: that the Model 60 is not rated for +P, period.

Anyone else have any inputs on the old 60? And what are they going for now? Has anyone shot +P out of theirs? If not, what is the ammo you carry in it?

Thanks!
 
.38 Special +P won't hurt a stainless Model 60 of any age.

I've been shooting +p equivalent hand-loads in a blue J-Frame 36 & 49 since 1970.
They are no worse for wear.

They weren't rated for +P then, because +P only came into being in 1974.
At that point SAAMI lowered the Standard pressure load from 18,900 CUP to the current 17,000 PSI.
And +P was introduced and is currently 18,500 PSI.

Truth be known, todays +P 158 grain lead load is only rated around 890 FPS.
The standard load prior to 1974 was rated at 850 FPS.

If you can find any, the 135 grain Speer Short Barrel Gold Dot is a great SD load for them.
http://www.speer-ammo.com/products/short_brl.aspx

Practice with something less expensive.

rc
 
Last edited:
In addition to the Model 66 I carried for duty, my backup was a Model 60. It has fired countless rounds of our issued +P+ .38 Special loads - it was a 110 JHP and a pretty stout load. It was not a cartridge that was for retail sale, as it says all over the box (I do still have one box :) ). Most of us carried a .357 revolver, but our agency would not let us use .357 ammunition. Thus they issued us very hot +P+ .38 Specials.

Bottom line - as rc said, +P isn't going to bother yours. It's not real pleasant to shoot however.
 
You shouldn't have any problem using +P in a Mod60, but if you want a standard pressure load I would recommend the Buffalo Bore round here:

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=23

I keep the 158 SWC in my 1980 vintage Mod37 (alloy frame). It shoots point of aim at 7 yards.

Now if the Mod60 was mine I would go with the Speer short-barrel Gold Dot 135 HP +P. I had good success with this round in a recent vintage 642.
 
The official Smith and Wesson line on the use of +P ammunition in their .38 Special revolvers is that ANY model number marked revolver (the model numbering system for Smith and Wesson began in I think 1954?) is +P capable.

That being the case a discussion on what the use of +P practically entails is in order. ANY machine wears with use to one degree or another. Any revolver wears with each shot to one degree or another. Revolvers wear more with +P or higher pressure rounds than they do with standard pressure.

In a revolver that is rated +P capable by the manufacturer, the use of these rounds while acceptable still creates more wear than a standard pressure round. If in your normal use with standard pressure rounds a Smith would last say 3 lifetimes (not an unreasonable assumption), use of a significant number of +P might reduce that to 2 1/2 or maybe 2 lifetimes.

You are not risking catastrophic failure in your Mod 60. You with significant use are shortening the life span before a major overhaul or frame replacement is required. You may not live long enough to see the difference, and that is not an exaggeration.

Rossi is a completely separate kettle of fish. Even when using a Smith and Wesson pattern they did not use the same materials or production methods and I make no claims about any particular Rossi and the use of +P.
 
Last edited:
I'm still carrying a Model 60 I purchased used in the 70's....lots of rounds thru it and it's still tight......I carry +Ps and never gave it a second thought....

I recently picked up a model 60-15 3" .357 with adj sights and the matching Model 63 3".......still breakin them in........A Ruger followed me home also, GP101 .357 3 " ...she's a tank!
 
The Rossi is a copy of the S&W, that's why they are similar. However the same quality of materials & workmanship may or may not (most likely not) have gone into their production.
I would have no issues using +P for defensive purposes in a M60, along with a small amount of practice. The issues I would have with using +P as a regular target load have more to do with my not wanting to punish myself with the felt recoil, than any concern for the gun. Heck, I sparingly use +P in my M38 (a similar gun with an alloy frame) and have never noticed any issues.
I would not use +P in the Rossi.
 
.38 Special +P won't hurt a stainless Model 60 of any age.

I've been shooting +p equivalent hand-loads in a blue J-Frame 36 & 49 since 1970.
They are no worse for wear.

They weren't rated for +P then, because +P only came into being in 1974.
At that point SAAMI lowered the Standard pressure load from 18,900 CUP to the current 17,000 PSI.
And +P was introduced and is currently 18,500 PSI.

Truth be known, todays +P 158 grain lead load is only rated around 890 FPS.
The standard load prior to 1974 was rated at 850 FPS.

If you can find any, the 135 grain Speer Short Barrel Gold Dot is a great SD load for them.
http://www.speer-ammo.com/products/short_brl.aspx

Practice with something less expensive.

rc
The .38Spl. +P standard was changed in late 1994 from 18,500 psi to the current 20,000 psi when ammunition manufacturers could not provide the performance levels demanded by consumers. The current SAAMI MAP pressure for the .38 Spl. +P is 20,000 psi or 20,000 cup.

Note: That while the two pressure systems often give different numerical values, in this case they converge and read the same.
 
The unpinned barrel indicates the revolver was built in the last part of the 20th century, plenty strong for the +P of any era.
 
I own both

a model 60, mine is 357, and an older Rossi which I recently acquired, used. I was amazed at the fit and finish of the Rossi, as well as the $200 price tag, which is why I bought it. I would not hesitate to feed it a limited amount of +p rated ammo.
 
@ CZ223
Not to get off topic, but why would you think the Rossi that is made with a far inferior metal, be safe to shoot +P ammo in it?
The Rossi is well made, but NOT to +P standards, regardless of fit and finish.
I think the Manual that came with my Rossi 88 recomended that only Lead Bullets be used and Target loads, NOT Jacketed ammo.
But I wish I had never sold my S&W M60.
And I had no quams about shooting +P ammo out of the Smith if I had to.
 
Thank you all for some great news...and the education. It seems logical and I'm glad I didn't sell it to buy a Ruger LCR. It feels great in the hand and has a wonderful balance. I also have a Smith 317 .22LR 8-shot revolver, which I got in a trade. At first, I planned to ditch it as I really wanted the Smith 3906 in the deal. But now you couldn't get it away from me with a crowbar! Strange how perceptions change. I now feel I got the best part of the deal. Before I really got to know it, I suffered some remorse as I traded a premium 629 with a pinned barrel and stamped sideplate. I'd never shot it, but it was a beauty. Anyway, the 317 is perfect for my bugout bag. The 629...not so much.

As for the Rossi, I have near equal faith in it as the 60. I had horrible luck with Taurus revolvers, especially a Model 66, which was gorgeous. But when I couldn't hit the broad side of a barn with it, I employed a little test an NRA technical writer taught me. Before he'd buy a .357, he'd take a box of bullets (125gr JHPs) to the gun store. He'd drop one bullet in each of the chambers and would go with the gun that caught most, or all, of the bullets. He didn't push them through as that might resize them, but he found that doing that usually got him the most accurate guns. If a bullet plopped through the chamber, he'd mark that chamber when he shot for accuracy or competition and not use it. Anyway, with that Taurus, all six chambers were more like holes. When cleaning the gun I couldn't feel any kind of a throat like you would with a Smith or Ruger Security-Six. Never had a problem with their autos, but I had several bad revolvers. Rossis, though, were always reliable, stout and well made pistols. I've seen S&W 681s with soft barrels and a Virginian Dragoon that had a hammer shatter on me like glass when I attempted to shoot it. I had a bad Astra once, which Interarms fixed, but the big Dragoon .44 mag also suffered from bad throats in the chambers, so I sold it. Every time I fired it, I was afraid the hammer would shatter again, so I'd flinch a little. I also didn't like it because it had no hammer safety, requiring me to keep an empty chamber.

I had a number of Rossis and they were fine guns with good sights, especially their little .22LR kit gun with adjustable sights. The front sights were fine, but these guns were no Model 63s. I bought two to replace my 63, which was stolen from my apartment. I was so ticked that I couldn't find another 63 that, for the same price, I got two Rossis which shot actually a little better than my 63 (probably because of the ejector shroud, which added weight to the barrel -- and the gun). My 3-inch Rossis shot great, were always tight, beautifully finished, and their actions weren't significantly worse than the 60. I was stunned to see how close a copy it is to the Smith. Can't speak for the springs or the firing pins, but everything else was about dead on equal. I've heard of people replacing the Rossi firing pins with Smith 60 firing pins, but I never had an issue with the ones that came with the Rossis.
 
Here is the "official word" from S&W revolvers as of 1993 on +P ammo in S&W's. However, read rcmodel's explanation in Post #2 for a current update on the matter.


"...from a Smith & Wesson owner's manual printed in 1993:

Revolvers in which .38 Special +P ammunition can be used:
• J frames - Models 60-4 (full underlug barrel only), 60-7, 60-8, 640, 649-2
• K frames - Models 10, 13, 14, 15, 19, 64, 65, 66, 67
• L frames - Models 581, 586, 681, 686
• N frames - Models 27, 28, 627
Here is S&W's warning about +P ammunition -
Quote:
"Plus P" (+P) ammunition generates pressures significantly in excess of the pressures associated with standard .38 Special ammunition. Such Pressures may affect the wear characteristics or exceed the margin of safety built into many revolvers and could therefore be DANGEROUS.

"Plus P" (+P) ammunition should not be used in medium (K frame) revolvers manufactured prior to 1958. Such pre-1958 medium (K frame) revolvers can be identified by the absence of a Model Number stamped inside the yoke cut of the frame (i.e. the area of the frame exposed when the cylinder is in the open position).

The "Plus-P-Plus" (+P+) marking on ammunition merely designates that it exceed established industry standards, but the designation does not represent defined pressure limits and therefore such ammunition may vary significantly as to the pressures generated. "Plus-P-Plus" (+P+) ammunition is not recommended for use in Smith & Wesson firearms."
 
Many strong and quality revolvers were made before the introduction of +P ammo. When +P came out, everyone assumed they needed a new gun.

I carry a 1955 Colt Cobra with +P loads. When that gun was made, the "standard" .38 loading had more pressure than today's +P's. Industry standards changed and the standard 38 became a much weaker cartridge. Unless it's wore out or broken, any .38Spl revolver you can find will stand up to years of +P rounds.

I say again: Today's +P's are weaker than the original factory loading in the .38Spl.
 
what is the old Model 60 capable of? Or should it just be retired as obsolete?

Not likely. J-Frame size revolvers are a top selling handgun in the concealed carry world.

Dittos that your steel frame Model 60 will digest a regular diet of +P ammunition. +P ammunition may accelerate wear on the gun but you are going to have to shoot a lot of it before that happens.

Ditch the Glaser Blue Tips. It is generally considered to be out-of-date old technology.

For suggested factory loads try Hornady Critical Defense in regular 38 Special and 38 Special +P. I conducted side by side tests of the Critical Defense against Federal Hydr-Shoks. I fired the rounds through four layers of heavy demin covered by four layers of light cotton shirt from my 2” J-Frame. The Hydra-Shoks expanded 50% of the time while all of the Hornady Critical Defense bullets fully expanded 100%. I use Hornady Critical Defense +P in all of my 38 Special revolvers.
 
The official Smith and Wesson line on the use of +P ammunition in their .38 Special revolvers is that ANY model number marked revolver (the model numbering system for Smith and Wesson began in I think 1954?) is +P capable.
That's certainly not true. You can read it below...

374758080.jpg
 
The official Smith and Wesson line on the use of +P ammunition in their .38 Special revolvers is that ANY model number marked revolver (the model numbering system for Smith and Wesson began in I think 1954?) is +P capable.

That being the case a discussion on what the use of +P practically entails is in order. ANY machine wears with use to one degree or another. Any revolver wears with each shot to one degree or another. Revolvers wear more with +P or higher pressure rounds than they do with standard pressure.

In a revolver that is rated +P capable by the manufacturer, the use of these rounds while acceptable still creates more wear than a standard pressure round. If in your normal use with standard pressure rounds a Smith would last say 3 lifetimes (not an unreasonable assumption), use of a significant number of +P might reduce that to 2 1/2 or maybe 2 lifetimes.

You are not risking catastrophic failure in your Mod 60. You with significant use are shortening the life span before a major overhaul or frame replacement is required. You may not live long enough to see the difference, and that is not an exaggeration.

Rossi is a completely separate kettle of fish. Even when using a Smith and Wesson pattern they did not use the same materials or production methods and I make no claims about any particular Rossi and the use of +P.
Not quite right. S&W has said that +P is safe in any model marked Steel K frame revolver.
Although most of us believe that to be a conservative answer.
 
Thanks for the link, popeye. That is a very good thread.
Actually, there was a lot of mis-information posted in that thread, and much of what one poster said has been debunked. He gave the pressures incorrectly (they are correct in the more recent post of this current thread), his assertion about 38 Super was proven incorrect, and some of the old factory ammo speeds are wrong as well. There is certainly better info available about +P, and much of it is found in this current thread.

Here are some things you can count on: (1) Under normal curcumstances you will not be able to shoot enough +P to harm that Model 60. (2) There is a significant difference between standard pressure ammo and +P, all you have to do to tell that is shoot some in the M60, your hand will let you know. (3) The old 1960/70's quoted factory .38 Special ammo ballistics were based upon long, unvented test barrels, and those high numbers were never actually achieved in guns you could carry on your belt.
 
Stiab is making sense. And the charts from S&W clearly state their position.

Saxon Pig (who was cited by a poster above) and I have gone around and around on this issue on the S-W board for years. I think he misleads people by demeaning Plus P ammo, which is NOT all the same. Some of the Buffalo Bore stuff is quite hot, on the heels of the old .38-44 Hi-Velocity load, which was rated at some 1125FPS in 6.5-inch barrels. The Plus P Plus police-only ammo is loaded to the pressure of the department/agency that ordered it. THERE IS NO SAAMI LEVEL FOR THIS PLUS P PLUS AMMO AND YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT PRESSURES AND VELOCITES IT GENERATES. IT WAS NORMALLY ISSUED FOR USE IN .357 GUNS!

Many casual readers will be misled by any assertion that all Plus P is mild and can be used in any .38 Special gun. Some do not know the difference between Plus P and Plus P Plus!

The OP said he has a Model 60 without a barrel pin. He probably has a Model 60-7 or later. Just swing out the cylinder and look for the Model no. stamped in the frame! Note that S&W DOES APPROVE the use of normal Plus P ammo in these later Model 60's, from M60-4-on. But using it ROUTINELY for range firing will perhaps result in early cylinder endshake. Some people fire hundreds of rounds per range visit! Occasional familiarity firing and field use is no problem. I would certainly use Plus P ammo in .38 Special for defense!

I approve the use of Speer's Gold Dot 135 grain Short Barrel ammo in snub .38's and three-inch barrels. A Speer source told me that both NYPD and LAPD issue it even for their remaining four-inch .38's and that it has been very satisfactory in actual shootings. For about 30 years, I wrote for gun magazines and had access to engineers and PR people at ammo companies, which the average consumer does not have. Some told me things off the record that will probably never be published. And some shared info about bullet performance on humans and on deer that will not be released. Police departments do not want it known if they use ammo that liberal "community activists" will oppose. There are also legal issues about releasing specific bullet performance in cases that may go to trial or undergo peer review.

After all of this consultation and wide reading, I use that 135 grain Short Barrel load in shorter barrels when I can find any, or I load the older lead SWC-HP round. I do have some Federal 129 grain Hydra-Shok ammo left and feel it'll usually work, as will Speer's older 125 grain bullet, ideally used in four-inch or longer barrels. If larger animals may be encountered, I'd prefer the 158 grain lead SWC-HP ammo. Buffalo Bore's hotter version is probably very potent. I haven't seen any cases where it was used on humans or game. In gelatin tests, it has sometimes lost some bullet weight and not done as well as the older versions from Remington, Federal, and Winchester. And it is VERY expensive! But it probably makes a fine carry load in medium-framed .357 guns as well as in sturdier small .38's. Recoil is probably quite stout. I haven't fired any.

Now, Massad Ayoob is a very respected gun writer. Those of you who bother to read gun magazines instead of relying on Internet gossip will know his byline. He reported stretching the frame on a S&W M-38 Airweight Bodyguard within some 500 rounds of Plus P ammo. S&W do NOT recommend the use of Plus P ammo in older Bodyguard Airweight .38's. He found out why. The frame eventually stretched to the point that firing became unreliable!

Think about that the next time you see some Internet savant telling you that all Plus P ammo is the same and that it's barely hotter than standard .38 ammo used to be. He's going by six-inch (or longer!) pressure barrel results on that older ammo, not on current four-inch vented test barrel results!

I saw chronographed tests of that ammo from the 1960's-on; some loaded earlier. The velocities were not as one frequent poster claims. In fact they were usually as mild or more so than current standard ammo! BTW, I asked the Federal PR man a few years ago to have his company's engineers fire their 129 grain Hydra-Shok Plus P round from both snub and three-inch barreled S&W revolvers (not from test barrels) and report the results. At the time, I was writing an article on the advantages of three inch barrels. He said they got 836 FPS from the two-inch gun and about a hundred feet more from the three-inched example. I hope that interests someone. He went to a lot of trouble so that I could report that, and I'm grateful for his effort and that of Federal ammunition personnel in general.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top