One day or 2day Basic Carbine course?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, hmm. I'm no 'tactical' expert here, but a couple red flags come up in my mind.

First off, $370/day to run around shooting at stuff? Tack on the 400 rounds of ammo cost and you're looking at well over $500 or more...for one day.

I also don't like this statement...

All cell phones and GPS devices must be left behind at Hatfields.

Absolute dealbreaker. If an emergency ever came up with my family I'd have no way of knowing.

If you just want to learn how to use your new rifle, search around...I'm sure there are basic classes for much cheaper. Heck the Appleseed weekend course my friend and I attended was free, except for ammo.

EDIT: Just doing a basic Google search, I came up with this.

http://www.ccjatraining.com/courses-training/civilian/index.htm

Looks like a one day entry level course is $200, and it's down in Frednecksburg (I mean, Fredericksburg). Yes...I used to live in NOVA so I can joke about that.
 
Last edited:
That sounds a bit like a rip off tbh. Watch some videos on youtube and shoot, practice. Spend the $300 you would on the class on 1000 rounds of ammo.
 
definitely do the EAG class.

Pat Rogers is one of the best trainers out there.

$ spent on classes is money well spent. Buying ammo and blasting is better than sitting inside blabbling on the internet, but it is not a substitute for quality training.

Learn the RIGHT way to shoot and THEN you will know how to practice.

Watching DVDs and youtube videos is better than nothing, but is a poor substitute for actual in-person instruction and coaching. The DVDs and youtube cannot see what you are doing wrong and correct your technique.

also, if you are even a little bit bright, you can learn a lot from watching other students in the class make mistakes. And in his regular 3-day carbine classes you will usually meet some high-quality people.
 
I would say that neither course really seems exorbitantly expensive. But not cheap, either.

However, you might want to narrow down the things that YOU want to learn before you sign up.

You can easily burn many thousands of rounds practicing whatever techniques you can think up on your own -- and generally, that will be practicing the kind of thing you'll have to UN-learn later. Good training is a huge cost and time savings -- worth far more than what you pay for it -- because of how much farther, faster, up the learning curve it will push you.

But know exactly what you're paying for. A $200 day spent learning about cleaning patches and how to use a bore brush might be great, or might leave a bad taste in your mouth.

--

As a further clarification, know what KIND of training you're buying. You can go to an Appleseed shoot (GREAT idea!) and learn the fundamentals of rifle marksmanship. But you won't learn "practical" shooting techniques, immediate action drills, shooting around cover, shooting on the move, etc. You can go to a "tactical" shooting class and learn some of those things, but not the tips and techniques that a competition shooter (in any of several disciplines) might need to know. You can go to a competition-oriented class but won't learn self-defense shooting and the legal aspects of lethal force ... and etc, etc.

Figure out what you want to know how to do, and then find a class which will teach you that.
 
I guess for the person who has never owned or extensively shot firearms; especially a rifle designed for self/home defense; there is something to be said for these classes. But for the individual with firearm experience; growing up and shooting; currently hunts and shoots; etc... You'd do much better spending $300-$400 on ammunition.

If you are totally new to AR's, AK's, military weapons, etc... and you want to protect your house with it, then go for it. Maybe you need someone to teach you how to clean a gun. For me, I see nothing but a total waste of money. And for someone to dictate that it must be m193 ammo and you can't have your phone/gps at the range. What a rip off.

Sorry, but so many of these course are simply rip offs. If you have any significant experience with firearms, then this type of course isn't going to teach you anything that you don't already know or can't figure out on your own. If you're that new to weapons, then maybe you shouldn't be starting off with a military carbine.

I've seen some more advanced classes that make some sense. Especially for someone who is very familiar with an AR. They want to learn more tactical operations, low light shooting, malfunctions, etc... I can see this. I still wouldn't, but I can see people taking them. But some of these basic classes seem like such a rip off. And it's worse when they force you to take a lower level class as a pre-requisite before a more advance. Especially when the more advanced isn't all that. So; if you have absolutely no experience with an AR, you bought one anyway, and you want to learn how to shoot it. A basic course would be good. "For what it's worth; basic classes can be found for UNDER $100". If you have any experience with weapons, hunting, pistols, etc... and aren't afraid of guns; then don't waste your money on such a course. Spend your money on ammo and practice.
 
The EAG class is, as noted, with one of the top trainers in the country. I have no idea who is teaching the other class. If you can manage two days and the slightly greater cost, definitely do the EAG class. $440 seems very reasonable for the caliber of instruction.
 
Another strong vote for EAG. Be aware that you'll need electronic ear pro for Pat's classes. The other class seems to have too many caveats and is very expensive for a one day no name course.

As for long time shooters having no need for a class, my experience was totally different. My retirement present was a 3 day handgun/carbine class at Tiger McKee's www.shootrite.com and I learned bunches. :)
 
christcorp said:
I guess for the person who has never owned or extensively shot firearms; especially a rifle designed for self/home defense; there is something to be said for these classes. But for the individual with firearm experience; growing up and shooting; currently hunts and shoots; etc... You'd do much better spending $300-$400 on ammunition.

I grew up in a family where firearms were common. I had my first rifle at age 7 and was shooting military style weapons before I could drive a car. I worked for a Title II SOT building M16s and AR15s in college and then went into the military. I can tell you that I learned more about firearms in my first 3 day pistol class than I did in the entire previous 20 years. And while my first rifle class wasn't quite as big a success due to the level of instruction, I learned a great deal there as well.

I took my second rifle class with another life long shooter who had been a member of the Air Force's Marksmanship team. He learned so much from it that he proceeded to take every class the facility had.

Like everyone else, I don't know who your first link is. I can say that is very expensive for a day's instruction. EAG has a superb reputation. Pat Rogers is a Vietnam era Marine Force Recon member, a 20yr veteran of NYPD, and a veteran of "other governmental agencies." In terms of the massive amount of experience available to you, it would be hard to beat one of his classes. However, his classes focus on fighting with a rifle at typically encountered distances (50yds and less). If that is what you want to learn, I would definitely consider one of his classes.
 
Yep, of course all you guys are right about taking classes, I bet all the people in the old days took classes on how to defend their homes against attacks by Indians and other cutthroats. Big waste of money and ammo when you will probably never use all that training and what kind of training is it going to be?. Against a modern Army or against gangs if SHTF happens? I need to know how to fight an enemy when ambushed in a car like a hole in the head, how many people carry a loaded AR in their car anyway?...
But, of course if you think you need the training and are not up to the task of going to the local gun range and shoot fairly often, then of course take a class.
 
Last edited:
classes

If you are new to this, then take a class. I like the second option you show mainly due to the words about knee and elbow pads. Sounds like you will get in some exercise.

If you are new to the M4 style weapon, you will learn lots of things. Things like which of the multiple styles of reloading work best for you, which shooting positions you work best with, and in what your clicks are.

If the instructors are from military backgrounds, you will learn the joy of hearing "let em hang". And near the end of the day, just hearing "ready, up" will hurt. Oh, did I mention that you will most likely do drills? Yes, lots of drills. These are tiring, but you will learn.

My wife and I have taken multiple "carbine classes" and have always learned more. The people you meet will be a great plus.

This is a perfect chance for you to really know what the deal is, not just talk it like so many do.
 
Last edited:
I bet all the people in the old days took classes on how to defend their homes against attacks by Indians and other cutthroats.
Kind of silly argument, don't you think? Which people? How many prevailed? How many died? How many were skilled enough for the challenges they faced and how many weren't? The answer is neither "all of them" or "none." Is any of that going to be warm consolation if your skills aren't up to whatever challenge you face?

But like I said, figure out what you want to know how to do, and find training that is directed at those skills. Maybe the challenge you want to prepare for is competition position shooting ("High Power"). Maybe it is practical shooting competition. Maybe home/self defense is more compelling to you. Some things cross over between skill sets. Some don't.

Big waste of money and ammo when you will probably never use all that training
Those are kind of strong words! Heck, you probably will never use the pistol on your hip, the shotgun in the corner of your closet, or your fire extinguisher, either. Are they a "big waste of money?"

and what kind of training is it going to be?. Against a modern Army or against gangs if SHTF happens?
Very few carbine or pistol classes are going to attempt to teach you to fight a modern Army. They will help you learn some new skills (and how to practice those skills on your own) for running those guns as efficiently -- as quickly accurately -- as possible, in all kinds of positions, under varying conditions, while dealing effectively with malfunctions and even physical constraints (like injury). That might indeed help you to face multiple hostile folks. Or might help you move through a practical competition COF more adroitly. And, if you end up taking a knee behind a door-frame or bed in your own house some night, wondering if the creep who just broke into your house is going to try to get into your safe area -- you probably won't be thinking, "Darn, I sure wasted my money learning how to run this gun." :)

I need to know how to fight an enemy when ambushed in a car like a hole in the head, how many people carry a loaded AR in their car anyway?...
Some. It comes up here often enough. But a car is just another obstacle that has to be worked around and can be used as cover. The world is full of objects of cover and concealment. Practicing to use them effectively when working with a long-gun is pretty smart.

I can't see using that much money out of my SS check to warrant any classes since I have been hunting and shooting guns since 1945
Well, that's certainly understandable. Maybe you've learned all that you'll be able to learn. But not everyone has your background, or faces the same limitations.

..But, of course if you think you need the training and are not up to the task of going to the local gun range and shoot fairly often, then of course take a class.
As is said so many times, you can spend a lifetime plinking away at the local range -- fire tens (or hundreds) of thousands of rounds -- and not stumble upon (organically develop) some of the skills and abilities that a good trainer can build in you in a few hours.

Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect. If you believe you already know all you can know -- you're right. And that's too bad.

:)
 
jem375 said:
Yep, of course all you guys are right about taking classes, I bet all the people in the old days took classes on how to defend their homes against attacks by Indians and other cutthroats.

Sounds like a plan to me. I mean it is only my life. Why would I want to learn how I was making stupid assumptions in a safe environment with no serious consequences? Much better to learn how ignorant I am in an actual life and death fight! Just like the pioneers of old! If I survive, I get valuable training for free without having to pay for it. Super Deal! :D

Big waste of money and ammo when you will probably never use all that training

Well, if you'll probably never use the training, then you'll probably never need the firearm or ammunition either. Might as well save the money and not buy it to begin with..

and what kind of training is it going to be?. Against a modern Army or against gangs if SHTF happens?

There is a wide range of training available, covering a wide range of subjects. What kind of training it is going to be depends on what kind of training you want to attend. If you attend training that is useless for your situation, then you'll have skills that are useless for your situation. However, there are classes dealing with concealed carry issues, typical criminal attacks, using a carbine or shotgun for home defense, and various other classes that cover aspects of real-life firearms use that happen every day. You can also just train to be better at the gun game of your choice if you view shooting as purely recreational.

And of course the other side benefit of training is the ability to try out expensive accessories in real-world conditions without having to buy it. Want to use an FN SCAR like it was meant to be used? EAG has one for students. Want to know how to keep multiple ARs running trouble free into 5 digit round counts? EAG does it every weekend. Want to play with a $700 Aimpoint? See which weaponlight works best in an actual darkened shoothouse? Training is a great place to try gear and find out what works for you without having to actually buy a $700 optic and hope it works.

I need to know how to fight an enemy when ambushed in a car like a hole in the head, how many people carry a loaded AR in their car anyway?...

Well, if you don't need that skill, maybe you should focus on taking training that does apply to you? However, people spend a great deal of time in vehicles and a lot of crime happens in the vicinity of vehicles. In other parts of the world, roadblock robberies are much more common. However, I don't believe either of the classes the OP is considering address these issues.

But, of course if you think you need the training and are not up to the task of going to the local gun range and shoot fairly often, then of course take a class.

Before I took my first pistol class, I was buying 1,000 rounds of 9mm for $143 and shooting it in a month. I did this for six months under the misguided belief that I was "training." And this was after I had spent years hunting, worked for an SOT, been in the military, and thought I was very knowledgable about firearms. Instead, I was mostly developing bad habits that it would later take tens of thousands of rounds to overcome. And of course, since I was shooting on a local public range, I wasn't able to practice a wide range of things that are useful to self-defense like shooting while moving, shooting rapidly under pressure, drawing and shooting, etc. Of course, that is probably a good thing since I probably lacked the skill and knowledge to do many of those things in a safe manner.

Then I took the pistol class. In 1,000 rounds over 3 days, I did more to improve my shooting than I had in the previous 20 years of shooting. Not only did I get a lot better quickly; but I got to use my skills with things like reactive targets and moving targets. I got to go through a shoot house. I learned all kinds of important lessons that I never would have learned in 20 years of shooting on the range because those problems couldn't have come up in a typical public range environment. Every time I think about the 6,000 rounds I put downrange, I cringe. I think of how much better I would be if I had just gotten good instruction first and learned to execute the fundamentals correctly BEFORE I started slinging rounds downrange at 1,000 a month. Now that I don't have that luxury anymore, I really regret not making better use of my training budget.

And of course, let's analyze what you are claiming:

jem375's recommended course of action: OP takes $440 worth of 5.56 ammo (around 1,000 rounds) and goes to shoot on the range by himself.

BR's recommended course of action: Go get 16 hours of instruction from a man who has been in multiple gun fights over the past 30 years. A man who has experience in combat as a Force Recon Marine and experience in combat as a 20yr veteran of NYPD. In addition to the combat experience, this instructor has shot High Master and has over a decade of experience teaching our own elite forces to fight and shoot with firearms.

Your approach is not going to make the OP a better shooter than my approach. It is not even going to come close. In terms of efficiency and savings, the OP would be much better off eliminating his bad habits early and spending his time developing good muscle memory.
 
Interesting postings, like I wrote before if you think you need the training, go right ahead.
Another interesting piece in the paper and on the internet now, an old granny in a wheelchair home was invaded by 4 armed hispanics and all she had was a single shot shotgun that she used for varmints in her garden, well when 2 of them broke into her bedroom, she shot and hit one in the face, and the other in the hand. The other 2 ran out of the house and they all were caught later. I am sure she took all kinds of training in her lifetime...lol
Another thing, in those great training sessions, you are still only shooting at paper or other targets and not in real live violent encounters, and even police miss 82% of the time.
 
It's like I wrote before, I think it is a waste of money, time, and ammo. But, if you think you need it, go right ahead, I have better things to do for my money, and if the situation comes up I am quite sure I can handle the situation ok.
Besides, we are getting away from the posters original intent, 1 day or 2 days, I say none....lol
Anyway, good shooting everyone, not everyone agrees all the time....
 
Last edited:
After years of shooting, some hunting, and a lot of Range time, taking one of those "high dollar" shooting classes did more to improve my skill level than anything taught by the agencies I have been employed by or my going out and shooting at the local Range.

BikerRN
 
an old granny in a wheelchair home was invaded ... they all were caught later. I am sure she took all kinds of training in her lifetime...lol

Ahhh, the "worst common denominator" philosophy. This worked once for someone somewhere, therefore it's all I'll ever need.

I've known roofers who's safety "ropes" were knotted extension cords. Worked for them. Might work for me. I've got old extension cords and a belt to tie them to -- why spend the money? I mean, what are the odds that I'll ever fall anyway? Fall arrest harnesses = BIG waste of cash.

not everyone agrees all the time
True enough!
 
Another interesting piece in the paper and on the internet now, an old granny in a wheelchair home was invaded by 4 armed hispanics and all she had was a single shot shotgun that she used for varmints in her garden, well when 2 of them broke into her bedroom, she shot and hit one in the face, and the other in the hand. The other 2 ran out of the house and they all were caught later. I am sure she took all kinds of training in her lifetime...lol

Good for her. Nobody is saying you can't defend yourself without training. We're just pointing out the blindingly obvious fact that training helps improve the odds in your favor. Given the high stakes involved and the fact that training itself is actually pretty fun, many people feel it is a good investment. In fact, I don't know of a single person of any skill level who hasn't thought the money they spent on training was a good deal. The only people I know who seem to feel that way are those who have never taken a course.

Another thing, in those great training sessions, you are still only shooting at paper or other targets and not in real live violent encounters, and even police miss 82% of the time.

So your point is that because better training than shooting at a motionless paper target on a square range doesn't provide ideal results, you should stick with a lesser level of training?

Actually, the local place here offers Force-on-Force training with Simunitions once you have a certain base level of experience. So you get about as close to a real, live violent encounter as you can in a safe, controlled environment.

And as I said, I think your point about police just reinforces what is being said. We know that training works to improve hit ratios. All your statistic shows is that training like the average police officer is going to put you in a position to miss 82% of your shots in a real life scenario. If you want to improve on that number, you need better training.
 
There is no way I'd take that class with Hatfields. I'm not familiar with their classes, but I've never heard a positive thing about their gunsmithing shop they have, and now that they have started teaching classes too, I don't think I'd want them teaching me anything. Look on that site for the thread about Hatfields.

EDITED: I originally said I'd not take either, but after reading it again I realized that the second class isn't by Hatfields. So it's only the first one I wouldn't consider. I made a mistake here, and I hope you guys can forgive me for saying I wouldn't take either.
 
Last edited:
Ahhh, the "worst common denominator" philosophy. This worked once for someone somewhere, therefore it's all I'll ever need.

I've known roofers who's safety "ropes" were knotted extension cords. Worked for them. Might work for me. I've got old extension cords and a belt to tie them to -- why spend the money? I mean, what are the odds that I'll ever fall anyway? Fall arrest harnesses = BIG waste of cash.

True enough!
actually a million to a million and a half incidents involving self defense from home invasions, car jacking, and etc. happen every year and I doubt if too many of these SD incidents involve people who take classes. Somehow people manage to defend themselves without going to a class.
 
jem375 said:
actually a million to a million and a half incidents involving self defense from home invasions, car jacking, and etc. happen every year and I doubt if too many of these SD incidents involve people who take classes.

Not suprising that not much training was needed since according to Gary Kleck (the same person who made those estimates), only 23.9% of those uses involved actually firing the gun. So in many of those cases, a lack of training isn't going to be major handicap; but that remaining 23.9% can be a problem, especially when you're betting your life on the outcome.

For example, in a recent Houston home invasion, a home owner heard the intruders and announced that he was armed and had called police while forting up in the bedroom. The attackers responded by shooting through his bedroom wall, forcing him to leave cover to deal with the problem. In the dark and under fire (he was hit in the abdomen; but didn't notice it until afterwards), he fired two shots with a shotgun and stopped both attackers. Luckily for him, he had taken several classes geared towards home defense with a shotgun.

Personally, I don't understand the bias against training. Nobody buys a violin and then just makes noise with it until they hit something remotely musical and then decides they are now a concert violinist. Contrary to popular belief, there is no innate knowledge of how to use a firearm coded on the Y-chromosome.

Somehow people manage to defend themselves without going to a class.

I'm sure they do. Did they do it BECAUSE of their ignorance or DESPITE it? I don't think you are seriously arguing that being more ignorant is a better solution to a life-or-death contest are you?
 
Well, hmm. I'm no 'tactical' expert here, but a couple red flags come up in my mind.

First off, $370/day to run around shooting at stuff? Tack on the 400 rounds of ammo cost and you're looking at well over $500 or more...for one day.

I also don't like this statement...



Absolute dealbreaker. If an emergency ever came up with my family I'd have no way of knowing.

If you just want to learn how to use your new rifle, search around...I'm sure there are basic classes for much cheaper. Heck the Appleseed weekend course my friend and I attended was free, except for ammo.

EDIT: Just doing a basic Google search, I came up with this.

http://www.ccjatraining.com/courses-training/civilian/index.htm

Looks like a one day entry level course is $200, and it's down in Frednecksburg (I mean, Fredericksburg). Yes...I used to live in NOVA so I can joke about that.
this got my attention of the $200 course:
Transition from Carbine to Handgun

not taking a basic course for precision.
taking it because i want to learn how to use it properly for self defense.
2012 apocalypse you know :p
 
Last edited:
actually a million to a million and a half incidents involving self defense from home invasions, car jacking, and etc. happen every year and I doubt if too many of these SD incidents involve people who take classes. Somehow people manage to defend themselves without going to a class.

Tell that to the 19 year old dead girl that use to be my daughter's best friend in school. She didn't do so well in the car jacking.

Put me down as one of the folks that do believe in training....I spend between 40 and 80 hours per year attending professional training courses. Since I have a lot more than a SS check to live on, I can afford the training. I've taken force-on-force training using 9mm simunitions. Who would have thought one of the training sessions even included a car jacking at 10:00 PM (yeah, class was running pretty long that day).

We don't get to pick the time or day bad people decide to do bad things....and I'll do my best to avoid the situation if at all possible. However, I owe it to my wife and kids to be there for them. I'll take what ever advantage I can to ensure it turns out that way. Doing anything less leaves me wanting as a husband and father, IMO.
 
I guess people who already know everything probably won't benefit from taking a class. Heck, maybe they should take up teaching them! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top