Deanimator
Member
Should I point out that WITHOUT registration, a ban can't be ENFORCED?
But then anybody who supports REGISTRATION probably also supports warrantless house to house searches as well.
Oregon gun laws improved last year by implementing universal background checks?
- Thread starter Warp
- Start date
- Status
But then anybody who supports REGISTRATION probably also supports warrantless house to house searches as well.
They do.
Do you mean why do convicted criminals who are prohibited person not buy directly from FFL's? Because they can and do get guns through other means. And always will.
Yes. Why don't prohibited people buy directly from a dealer. It is by far the easiest way to get a gun and you can get whatever you want.
Red Wind
Member
On and on. On and on . On and on . Steven Bishop. 1977.
To what point with the Statist?
To what point with the Statist?
Registration isn't required to enforce a ban. If something is banned the simple possession of the prohibited item is cause for arrest.
Jlr2267
Member
Last edited:
Because they don't need to.
Which is why you admit you cannot show any evidence whatsoever that UBC does anything to reduce violent crime.
Red Wind
Member
Because of what I said in Post #129. Give this up !!!
No. They don't buy from FFLs because they cannot. They cannot buy from FFLs because they can't pass a background check.
Background checks at FFLs have pushed prohibited person to buy their guns from individuals (either in the legal private market or the black market.)
Red Wind
Member
Do you need more proof now,Warp? Beria would be an easier opponent. But Missouri mules die hard!
You, of course, have evidence and citations showing that criminals buy their guns privately from law abiding citizens, right? Right?
Or that some people are not convicted criminals and prohibited persons even though they have committed and will commit crimes.
Certainly they would never steal them or buy them from other criminals that got them as a result of theft. No no certainly not
Still waiting on any evidence whatsoever showing that UBC's have reduce violent crime in states that have them.
Patiently waiting. I suspect, at this point, the strategy is to get the thread closed without ever addressing the issue.
Jlr2267
Member
Yes, they can. They give their clean girlfriend the money and she goes in and walks out with a new Glock.
Of course, most criminals want to avoid any paper trail at all, thus resorting to other, easier methods.
Red Wind
Member
Still feeding , still failing. Will the light ever shine?
Which is another benefit of UBCs. Law enforcement no longer has to prove intent, just that the transfer took place without a background check.
Jlr2267
Member
So you finally admit that the actual benefit is in creating more criminals, rather than PREVENTING crime....got it
Red Wind
Member
This is why JSH1 wins the thread and the 1791 RKBA "shall not be infringed" ,goes down with Drano. You all cannot help yourselves!
Just ignore him. Resist. But you JUST cannot do it. It's a failing.
Jlr2267
Member
In honor of this thread, and my exit from it, I'm going to spend some time on Armslist in search of a high capacity assault weapon with a shoulder thingy.This is why JSH1 wins the thread and the 1791 RKBA "shall not be infringed" ,goes down with Drano.
You all cannot help yourselves!
Glad I still live in a free state.
No I don't. Not sure where you got that from.
I can do the same in Oregon.
Jlr2267
Member
post #139
"In honor of this thread, and my exit from it, I'm going to spend some time on Armslist in search of a high capacity assault weapon with a shoulder thingy."
Don't forget the barrel shroud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo
Don't forget the barrel shroud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo
Jlr2267
Member
not without your government's permission
Red Wind
Member
Good for jlr2267. Even with my 152 IQ and absolutist stance, you can only do so much.
So making it easier to prosecute people that are breaking the law is creating criminals in your mind?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
