Outstanding Phila. Inquirer Editor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here it is.....

Editorial | Self-defense in Camden

A shooting not senseless


There are too many handguns in the wrong hands in Camden, which had 54 homicides in 2004. But the city is fortunate that one of those guns was in the hands recently of a shop owner named Ngoc Le.

An immigrant from Vietnam, Ngoc Le and his wife, Kelly, run a cell-phone and fishing-supply store in the city. On Dec. 31, they were working in the shop when a man came in and asked to buy a cellular-phone clip.

As Kelly Le turned her back, the man jumped over a counter and grabbed her, holding a knife to her throat. She called out to her husband, who was in another room.

In that room, he kept a licensed .380-caliber revolver in a drawer for protection.

What happened next was captured, on audio and partly on video, by a security camera in the shop.

Ngoc Le, holding his gun, pleaded with the assailant: "I'll let you go if you let her go."

But the attacker kept holding the knife to Kelly Le's throat and threatened, "I'll kill her." He moved, with the woman in his grasp, toward another room.

The tense standoff continued. Ngoc Le repeatedly told the assailant that he wouldn't shoot if the man released his wife. The attacker refused.

Ngoc Le was pointing his gun at the man from four feet away, but the man was using Kelly Le as a shield. At that moment, Kelly Le's knees buckled, and she slumped in her assailant's grasp. Ngoc Le saw his opening and fired once, hitting the man in the head, killing him instantly.

Perhaps 20 seconds had elapsed from the time the intruder jumped the counter until he was shot dead.

Ngoc Le's split-second decision turned out to have significance even beyond saving the life of his wife. DNA tests on the dead man, 32-year-old Antonio Diaz Reyes, proved that Reyes was the serial rapist who had attacked three women since November in broad daylight in Camden's central business district. He also was suspected of robbing a pharmacy in Camden at knifepoint.

There are too many illegal handguns in Camden, in Philadelphia and across the country. But this one episode is a perfect example of what law-abiding gun owners want everyone to understand in the never-ending debate over the Second Amendment. Privately owned firearms, properly certified and used responsibly, serve a legitimate - and sometimes life-saving - purpose.

You couldn't find a better place to illustrate this point, unfortunately, than in Camden. In addition to a rising homicide rate, the city of 79,000 had more than 800 aggravated assaults in 2004 and at least 750 robberies.

Commending Ngoc Le's deed ought not to be misconstrued as an encouragement of vigilante justice. He did what he had to do, on his own property, when his wife faced imminent grievous harm, and only after he gave his assailant an opportunity to live. No civilian in his or her right mind would want to be forced into that life-or-death decision. It is an awful thing to take a human life, no matter how desperate the situation or how despicable the victim.

It is not an argument for the death penalty, either; the government, in a court of law, has an option that Ngoc Le in that urgent moment did not have: to lock the rapist away where he could hurt no law-abiding citizens.

But this shooting, perhaps, is a symbol that the citizens of Camden have had enough. In that sense, if ever there was a right time for a justifiable homicide, this case was it. The city should recognize Ngoc Le in some official way for that heroism.

As if summoned by the sound of that single gunshot, federal prosecutors announced last week that they are riding to the city's rescue. A team of federal marshals will target the 50 most dangerous criminals in the city, and offenders who use guns will be singled out for federal prosecution.

This is welcome news in a city in which the working relationship between local and state police has deteriorated. U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie should be commended for recognizing the city's urgent need, especially after state Attorney General Peter Harvey balked at devoting more law-enforcement resources in Camden. Federal lawmakers will need to back up this promise with real dollars over the long term.

Speaking of money, there was a $30,000 reward for information leading to the capture of the serial rapist. Now that he's dead, the law firm that helped to put up the money has discussed donating the money to a battered women's shelter or a victims crisis center. Here's another thought: Why not split it among Reyes' victims, including Kelly Le?
 
I smell the latest anti-gun spin even in a generally pro-self defense article.
Commending Ngoc Le's deed ought not to be misconstrued as an encouragement of vigilante justice. He did what he had to do, on his own property, when his wife faced imminent grievous harm, and only after he gave his assailant an opportunity to live. No civilian in his or her right mind would want to be forced into that life-or-death decision. It is an awful thing to take a human life, no matter how desperate the situation or how despicable the victim.
Looks like we are slowing move toward the view that self-defense is in fact vigilante justice. I've seen this construction in a number of other articles.
 
Nah

I'm going to give the author the benifit of the doubt on that one sentence. The rest of that paragraph shows that the author understands what makes for a good shoot. As much as I enjoy watching Punisher and Boondock Saints, let's face it, vigilanteism(Is that a word?) is just for the movies.

In that room, he kept a licensed .380-caliber revolver in a drawer for protection.

So, does anyone actually make a .380 caliber revolver? But, you know what, I'm willing to overlook that one little mistake due to the tone of the rest of the article.

greg
 
You've gotta keep in mind who the audience for this piece is:

Members of the Blue Team completely beguiled by Bradyite propaganda.

The author put all the caveats on, partly because he believes them (IMO), and partly because the notion that honest men can use guns for noble purpose is the maximum these people can swallow in one sitting.
 
I like this article, even with the asides to any potential anti that reads it. It's wasn't that long ago when such a righteous shooting wouldn't even have been mentioned.
 
Mulliga, that was my initial response as well ... however we must remember that a journey of a thousand miles begins with one step ... this article is a big step in "our" direction in a part of the country that not long ago would have been completely silent about this case (if not ask for Mr. Le's head on a pike).
 
Too bad wanted posters still don't say "Wanted DEAD or ALIVE". Then Mr. LE could recieve the reward money. He is the one that took the bastard out I feel that the money should be his.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top