Old forum complaint, photos please.
I own one. When considering for self defense; It shoots some weird 9MM cartridge, Makarov. Strike 1. Mine isn't a bad gun, it's just that it has that abominable slide safety like a PPK. Strike 2. It also has that abominable heel mag release. There is no excuse for a heel mag release after JMB showed the world where a mag release should be to make sense, no offense meant to the 15% who think a heel release is a good idea. "Strike 3, your out" as a carry gun!
As a well made example of a historical handgun carried by minions of the evil empire it has historical interest, plus 1. And the Makarov cartridges are cheap though in a collapse will soon become unobtainable Plus .5. And for a historical shooter one doesn't defend his life with or carry it might be fun, though recoil can be abusive. plus another .5.
I have a safe full of interesting all steel guns that will still be equal to their ammunition for hundreds of years. I like them all. Any one of them could save my life in a pinch, that makes them dear to me, heh heh.
For self defense? JMB showed the world the way. For collecting? The P-64 is a fine piece. Really well made and well designed given the wrong framework of the PPK as a model.
The above is simply my personal opinion, and, like all opinions, should be taken for what it's worth. I'm not a gunfighter nor a gunsmith.