Phoenix Police Shoot Homeowner and Plan Cover-Up After Home Invasion 911 Call

Status
Not open for further replies.

si vis pacem

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
81
Location
Atlanta, GA
Yikes. Don't think this article has been posted yet. Profanity removed. Of course, let's not bash the police. What steps can we take to make sure this never happens to one of us?

http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/09/23/Family_Says_911_Tape_Caught_Cops_Planning_Cover-Up_After_Shooting.htm?=protectandserve

PHOENIX (CN) - A homeowner says a Phoenix police officer shot him six times in the back during a 911 home-invasion call, and the 911 tape recorded the officer's partner saying, "That's all right. Don't worry about it. I got your back. ... We clear?" The family says the officers were not aware that the 911 call was still recording as they spoke about covering up the shooting.

In their complaint in Maricopa County Court, Anthony and Lesley Arambula say an armed intruder "crashed through the front window" of their home on Sept. 17, 2008 and ran into one of their son's bedrooms.

Anthony, worried about his son who was still in his bedroom, says he "held the intruder calmly at gunpoint" and called 911.

Phoenix Police officers already in the neighborhood heard the crash of the Arambulas' window. When they approached the house, Lesley says, she told Sgt. Sean Coutts that her husband was inside holding the intruder at gunpoint. Lesley says Coutts failed to pass on that information to the two other officers.

Inside the house, the Arambulas say, Officer Brian Lilly shot Anthony six times in the back while he was still on the phone with the 911 operator - twice when he was on the ground.

The officers ran into the bedroom after Anthony told them, "You just killed ... you just killed the homeowner. The bad guy is in there."

The complaint states that Officer Lilly "admitted that it was only after Tony was laying, bullet-ridden, on the ground that he assessed the situation. The 911 tape continued to record what happened even after Officer Lilly unloaded his weapon into Tony, including Officer Lilly's post-shooting, one-word 'assessment': '[profanity].'

"Tony believed he was going to die; the 911 tape records his plaintive goodbye to his family: '... I love you ... I love you.' Then Tony made what he believed was a dying request to the officers; he did not want his young family to see him shot and bloodied. Officers callously ignored his request and painfully dragged Tony by his injured leg, through the home and out to his backyard patio, where they left him bloodied and shot right in front of Lesley, Matthew and Zachary."

The Arambulas say the officers later dragged Anthony onto gravel, then put him on top of the hot hood of a squad car, and "drove the squad car down the street with Tony lying on top, writing in pain."

According to the complaint, Lilly can be heard on the 911 tape telling Coutts, "We [profanity] up."

Lilly says on the tape that he did not know where Anthony's gun was when he shot him and that he "opened fire because he heard loud noises and saw someone who looked like he might be the 'Hispanic' male they were pursuing" before getting to the Arambulas' house, according to the complaint.

The complaint states: "Sgt. Coutts knew that officers has just shot up and likely killed an innocent homeowner and the husband of Lesley, with whom he had spoken before entering the home, instead of the armed intruder. Sgt. Coutts was quick to commence the cover-up of their terrible mistake. Sgt. Coutts asked Office Lilly where Tony's gun was at the time Officer Lilly had opened fire on Tony. Officer Lilly admitted that he did not know where Tony's gun was: 'I don't know. I heard screaming and I fired.'"

Lilly later told a police internal affairs investigator that Anthony had pointed his gun in his direction, "in the 'ready' position," the complaint states. But Anthony Arambula says he was facing away from the officers, who could not have even seen his gun.

The complaint continues: "Still not knowing that he is being recorded n the 911 tape, Sgt. Coutts interrupted Officer Lilly's admission and apology with his assurance that the cover-up would commence: 'That's all right. Don't worry about it. I got your back. ... We clear?'"

After the shooting, the Arambulas say, the Phoenix Police Department treated them "like suspects in a drug bust," denying Lesley, Michael and Zachary information about Anthony's condition and denying friends and family members access to him at the hospital.

Anthony Arambula survived, but continues to suffer pain, which he expects will last for the rest of his life.

The City of Phoenix and Officer Dzenan Ahmetovic also are named as defendants.

The Arambulas seek punitive damages for gross negligence, civil rights violations, failure to supervise, excessive force, deliberate indifference to medical needs, false arrest, and emotional distress. They are represented by Michael Manning with son Morrison Hecker.
 
I heard of this a couple days ago.

It will be interesting to see how it turns out.
 
Hopefully Fox News and latch onto this and destroy the credibility of the police department, and officers involved will be ruined financally for the rest of thier lives.
 
This same shooting was the topic of another thread that was closed just a few days ago, here.

Hopefully Fox News and latch onto this and destroy the credibility of the police department, and officers involved will be ruined financally for the rest of thier lives.

Nothing like jumping to a conclusion and wishing bad things on people you don't know and likely will never meet.

This story does paint a very bad picture of the police. Other angles of the same story were discussed in the closed thread. I hope a jury gets to the bottom of this and makes a rightful decision. I don't know what that decision should be.
 
I need to read better.

Either way, the one who failed to pass on the info needs fired immediately. Failure to forward that kind of critical information is not acceptable, and to risk it happening again is unforgivable.
 
Remember, though, that this story is based off of the plaintiff's complaint, so it necessarily will have a degree of bias.
 
Yikes. Don't think this article has been posted yet. Profanity removed. Of course, let's not bash the police. What steps can we take to make sure this never happens to one of us?

It starts with a massive campaign of millions of citizens demanding the undoing of the Police State we have spent the last 8 years foolishly solidifying to protect us from "terrorists." It starts with de-militarizing the police force and reminding them that they are here to PROTECT and SERVE we the people and that our country is not just one big prison for them to guard.

Tell me why local cops are driving around town with M4's in the trunk. Tell me why State Police have armored vehicles that look the same as the APCs the Marines patrol Bagdhad with. Tell me why the CATO institute has documented thousands of no-knock warrants that got the wrong address and violated almost the entire bill of rights on innocent individuals cause a thug SWAT guy read the warrant wrong and yet there is no legislation I can see anywhere to address this. Since when are we guilty until proven innocent and why don't more people notice? How come an intoxicated cop can shoot someone and just get a paid suspension from work?

Why is it just peachy for a local cop to be wearing Black BDU's, full face mask and M4 rifle is completely normal, but the suggestion that an average citizen could conceal a small handgun with a permit is some huge, controversial, scary thing?

A lot of people need to wake up, real fast, because soon it will be too late.
 
Last edited:
It starts with a massive campaign of millions of citizens demanding the undoing of the Police State we have spent the last 8 years foolishly solidifying to protect us from "terrorists." It starts with de-militarizing the police force and reminding them that they are here to PROTECT and SERVE we the people and that our country is not just one big prison for them to guard.
+1 I dont agree with everything posted on this board however Dark Knight you absolutely nailed my thoughts on this subject. I couldn't have worded my rebuttal any better.
 
It gets very bad very fast. Look no further than England, a CCTV camera in public, one for every 7 citizens, people developing "stab-proof" knives, the government regulating beer mug design so that they are made of plastic and not able to be weaponized. These are conditions that are imposed on the population of a PRISON not a "free" country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top