Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Pick A New One For Me...

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Wildalaska, Jan 18, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wildalaska

    Wildalaska member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,296
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    I have a choice:

    Winchester Model 70, pre 64, 1950s production, 300H &H unaltered, Lyman 4x scope, 90% overall, original pad. $600

    -or-

    1903A3, 1943 barrel and reciever, marked form Ogden Utah arsenal with Elmer Keiths inspection mark....$600


    Which one..both are hstorical, one is more useful for hunting...(not like I need anymore hunting rifles)

    WildtornAlaska
     
  2. Stickjockey

    Stickjockey Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,902
    Location:
    Happy Valley, Oregon
    Boy, tough choice. My interest lies in old military rifles, so I'd have to lean towards the '03A3.
     
  3. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,380
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    I'd have to go with the '03 here -- you can find other deals on pre-'64s, but Elmer Kieth marked Springfields are rare.
     
  4. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    What in the world is an "Elmer Keith 1903"??? I've never heard of it.

    Steve
     
  5. mparris71

    mparris71 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    167
    Location:
    WNC
    This is not going to help but, dig deep and buy both. If I had to pick I would go with the 03
     
  6. Dave R

    Dave R Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,628
    Location:
    Idaho
    The Keith '03 for sentimental reasons. The '50s Mod70 is a great rifle, but there are other great rifles. You may not get another shot at a Keith '03.

    Might have better future appreciation, too??
     
  7. Wildalaska

    Wildalaska member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,296
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    I hate this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Too many choices!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:banghead: :banghead:

    WildjustkillmeAlaska
     
  8. Redlg155

    Redlg155 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    NW Florida
    I'd get the 1903A3.

    As time goes on they will become even more scarce. Save this one from a future butcher shop! :D

    Good Shooting
    Red
     
  9. dakotasin

    dakotasin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,777
    Location:
    Transient
    i would surely go w/ the pre-64 winchester. they will also become scarcer.

    that might also be an indication that i'm not into military weapons - find them to be generally clunky, awkward, and ineffective for what i would use a rifle for...
     
  10. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
    Not a winchester fan but if you cant buy both i would buy the winchester as they say it will get harder to find one espically in that caliber
     
  11. Feanaro

    Feanaro Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,661
    Location:
    Leeds, AL.
    Never been a fan of "sporting" rifles, so I'd take the '03.
     
  12. Byron Quick

    Byron Quick Moderator In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,482
    Location:
    Waynesboro, Georgia
    Glad to be of service.

    You take the Winchester Model 70...300H&H unaltered? HUAH!


    I'll take the '03 with the Elmer Keith mark.:D

    How's that? Problem solved. I should charge.
     
  13. Biff

    Biff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    208
    Location:
    Eagle River, Alaska
    I'd go for the 03. It would be nice to have a memento of Elmer Keith. I already have George Nonte's .44 Special dies!

    Now if the Model 70 was in .270 with a 4X Lyman Alaskan and provenence showing a previous owner to be Jack O'Conner, well, then I would go for the Winchester!
     
  14. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,380
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    Quote:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    What in the world is an "Elmer Keith 1903"??? I've never heard of it.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Elmer Keith was a famous gun and hunting writer in years gone by. Among other things, he provided the inspiration for the development of the .44 Magnun.

    During WWII, he worked for Army Ordnance, and among his duties he inspected rifles -- a rifle with his inspector's cartouche stamped into the stock is a real collector's item.
     
  15. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,833
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
  16. Daniel T

    Daniel T Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,115
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I'd go with the 1903A3 as well.
     
  17. Jack19

    Jack19 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,058
    Location:
    Eastern CSA
    Another vote for the '03. How many Elmer Keith inspection mark rifles can there be?

    If you don't buy it, please let me know who has it for sale. :D
     
  18. LynnMassGuy

    LynnMassGuy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    842
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  19. Wildalaska

    Wildalaska member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,296
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Im gonnna try to get both!

    WildcreditisawonderfulthingAlaska
     
  20. Jack19

    Jack19 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,058
    Location:
    Eastern CSA
    WildAK, can you send me or post a pic of the 03 and EK inspection mark when you get a chance? No hurry. I'm green with envy. :D
     
  21. Wildalaska

    Wildalaska member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,296
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    I cant get a hold of the guy with the 03!

    ]Arggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg


    WildfranticAlaska
     
  22. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    Did you ever have to make up your mind? Say yes to one and leave the other behind?

    Interesting and delightful conundrum. Wild, buddy, if you have to boil it down to one or tother, the Model 70 300 H&H is also an Elmer Keith favorite. Did you know he had a big influence on the making of the original Model 70 Winchester back in the '30s? He thought the H&H was a good antelope ctg and also won some long range target trophies with the 300.

    What exackly does his inspection mark look like? I would shy away from something so persnickety as I know how easy something cosmetic can be faked. It would have to have an undeniable provenance before I would buy it as a relic. That's just me. There are more fake Walker Colts out there among collectors than were originally produced in 1847.

    Besides that, my taste just does not include military rifles in general, with a couple exception like the cute lil 30 carbine and the M16. The Springfield, Garand, M14, Mauser, etc. etc. has dang little allure for me. Again that's me. What about you?

    In contrast a pristine Model 70 Magnum has beaucoup intrinsic value both as a shooter and a collector's item that will appreciate. Winchesters are the most favored collectible firearm together with the Colt's pistols. I'd take the Winnie. Again, what about you? ;)
     
  23. JNewell

    JNewell Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Land of the Bean & the Cod
    This is almost easy...as rifles, the Win 70 is so much more appealing. Unless the 03A3 is absolutely perfect, untouched since Keith stamped his cartouche on it, it's really nothing terribly special -- at least relative to the 70.

    Gotta admit, though, the sentimental appeal of Keith's mark is strong. I'd still go for the 70, I think.

    JohnYouNeededAnother300H&HNewell

    see, two can do that thing...;)
     
  24. W Turner

    W Turner Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Messages:
    860
    Location:
    Hillsboro, AL
    No question for me.....the '03 is the way I'd go. To have anything marked/connected with some of the old time gun guys....sigh......


    Mino
     
  25. MeekandMild

    MeekandMild Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,877
    Wilde dude...I wouldn't bet my life on the 1943 date on the receiver on the 03. Check the serial number instead and go online until you can find the exact number where they started doing the double heat treatment. Low number 03s can develop fractures (no kidding) in the steel and catastrophic failure. Once you find out whether the specific rifle is safe then you can re-ask the question... :what:

    Once that question is cleared up I'd want to go with the 03 as I have a model 70 I bought a few years ago which is a total egg sucker.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page