Pig rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.
223/556.

The hunting community can suck eggs, I use it almost exclusively on deer. The bullet tech of today allows for the "anemic" cartridge to kill not only swiftly and humanely, but with less meat destruction if you eat these pigs.

Highly recommend Barnes TSX.
 
Let's not stir up a hunting debate over traditional rifles vs MSR's. There is plenty of room for both.

I appreciate the large number of .45-70 fans, there needs to be, as the rifles are slipping in sales. Winchester already went under, Savage is considered questionable, there are only imports or Henry on the market at first glance.

AR15's now make up 20% of the market and it's been growing for a decade. There are specific reasons which I outlined, and it really has a lot to do with the gun helping the shooter, not hampering him.

With the AR series being issued for over 45 years now, and some early models actually making C&R status, there's plenty of room to consider that they are becoming their own tradition. 2014 - 50 = 1964. They were available and deliberately marketed as hunting rifles then. https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=626583

$189.50 MSRP.

I paid less for an HK91 in 1978. I used it hunting then, with a first gen Aimpoint red dot, which had a battery life of 8 hours. I learned pretty quick how to dial it on if I heard interesting sounds out of sight.

What I also learned after having the luxury of simply pulling the trigger and tracking the game was that if a follow on shot was necessary, I was ready and on target. When I switched to a Rem 700 in .30-06, that advantage disappeared. When I tried a '64 Win 94 .30-30, the recoil wasn't that diminished.

When I went back to the previously despised AR - which I had carried and used in training for 22 years in the Reserves - I did so because it was lighter in the hand, and tired me less walking over rough terrain. It had less recoil, which prompted me to hesitate less taking a shot. And I could track the game with the same confidence as I had with the HK, knowing it wouldn't likely disappear while trying to chamber a new round.

Lots of self loading actions were on the market in the 20's and 30's as the next step in the evolution of firearms. It's still interesting as those models became dated, the market retreated to the simple cheap bolt action. The Great White Hunter fad of the '50's with magnum cartridges didn't help.

It takes a lot more development and work to make a self loading action. They don't inherently tolerate a wide variety of different ammunition. Military models are built to handle 1 - one - issue round, and the few others available have to conform to the gas pressure curve the gun requires.

If you choose a compatible load for the self loading action, they are highly reliable. Conversely, the manual action guns can shoot them all - but they generally don't have the same point of aim. Switching ammo about becomes an exercise in memorizing all the various holdovers.

As a rifle designed to shoot the first round well, they do the job. Unfortunately, game does not cooperate. Even deer. They may not stop, they often are in cover that can deflect a bullet.

Having hunted the same public land for 40 years now, and knowing what other hunters take into the woods, it's not hard to hear the rushed pace of a manual action gun blazing away in desperation trying to knock down game. Having heard the even quicker pace of a self loader in two shots, and seeing the game downed, I have more confidence it can do the job better.

If you want to shoot a more accurate gun that doesn't batter you with excessive recoil, keeps you on target, has plenty of sufficient cartridges available to tailor to the game you hunt, with a widespread and varied assortment of accessories to choose from, get an AR. Even the scope mounts are all the same, which is the first thing no assortment of manual action guns share, or are generally available. I've purchased all of mine from brick and mortar stores, the manual guns all had to be ordered.

There is another factor - even the major traditional makers see the handwriting on the wall. They all offer AR15's. They don't plan on going out of business because the public is changing their buying habits. They make what sells - unfortunately, Winchester and others simply would not follow the market and became victims to their stolidity. If there is one absolute certainty in life, it's that things change, and we can't stop it.

Like having all 50 states permit CCW. It's not all bad.
 
Double Naught Spy,

Your post was far too well thought out and even handed for a "which gun should I buy? " thread..... Please take note and adjust accordingly next time.
 
Unless you have some dummy pigs or some night vision device you arent going to shoot too many pogs at the time. I have shot a couple at a time with an AR 5.56, and I have shot a couple at a time with a bolt 308 cut down to 20". I like the 308 power and I am considering a semi auto 308 because it is faster, especially with a red dot scope. The bolt 308 is not a big handicap where I hunt though because its mostly woods and you aint gonna get two shots most of the time no matter what you are shooting. Sometimes you can sneak two out in the edge of a field if you are quick. I have done it so many times with my bolt it is second nature and I lose my sight picture for just only a second or two. I dont know if you have seen any of them in the wild but they are pure athletes. When they weigh only about 25 pounds or so they can run like the wind and can jump four feet high fences. They are tough. I actually had better luck with the 223 on deer than pigs.
 
Pig Riffle Musings ...

That dude last week who made "internet headlines" for taking that monster hog in, I think, North Carolina, did so with some type of 7.62/.308 AR and low-powered scope combo. That said, I largely agree with the points Tirod made that favor using an AR-based platform, regardless of what cartridge it's chambered for (5.56, 6.8, 7.62, et al). ARs have made substantial in-roads into hunting, both statistically and in terms of credibly demonstrating that the platform has a legitimate "sporting purpose" (if that was ever needed under the Second Amendment ... :rolleyes: )

The idea to find a rifle before you find a cartridge is sound. You need to match the rifle's abilities - and yours - to the job.

Agree, but there's also the consideration of how you'll be hunting the hogs, and how you do it could alter what rifle you might use.

For example, I'm set to go hog hunting later this year in the southern part of our state. The plan is to stalk them. For that type of hunting, I swapped out the 16" barrel on my 5.56mm LMT MRP with a separate 16" .300Blk tube (only needed the barrel; everything else is the same, including using the same 5.56mm bolt). I put a 1x-6x illuminated Leupy on it and then zero-ed it (roughly) @ 100yds with some 110gn FMJs. Just need to settle on choosing a 300 Blk load with a heavier projectile.

However, in talking with some very experienced hog hunters, who've hunted them all over, not just here (they're crazed about it like a niche sport, the way some guys love hunting just pairie dogs, shooting pheasants or fishing trout), one guy mentioned hunting them over a baited area. They set up about 75-100yds back, up on a platform that's sort of a blind, then wait for the hogs to come in. They're basically shooting "down" at them from an elevated position.

The one guys uses a customized Rem 700 in .308 with an 18" barrel. It's got B.O. bottom metal that takes AICS 5- or 10-rd mags, and he shoots off a bipod. He runs a can on the barrel and has hunted suppressed before. When shooting suppressed, according to him, it's very hard for the other hogs to determine which way the shot came from, as the normal blast is distorted in addition to the decibel reduction, and often the hogs actually run or scatter toward where these guys are set up. Thus, follow-up shots on other hogs with are not just possible, but frequent.

When initially planning my hunt, I'd thought about using my old Savage FP10 in .308, which I too run suppressed (see below). I had the barrel cut back from 24" to 20", but the big problem is still weight - with a scope (even a smaller, lighter one than the SS 10x pictured below), bipod, sling, and the can, it's a HEAVY load out and not one you'd want to hump while stalking pigs. But shooting it proned-out is a different story: it's super accurate (.75" @ 100yds all day) and hearing-safe.

Anyway, until I'd talk to these guys about some of their past hog hunts, I hadn't thought about doing a baited hunt where you could prone out from a distance and take them that way. The suppressor part was of particular interest to me, since something like 31 or 32 states allow lawfully-owned suppressors to be used on firearms while hunting.

Savage, of course, has come out with a line of hog-killing bolt guns, but after putting on a scope and sling (even w/o a bipod or can), I have to believe they're going to be a bit weighty for other than stationary shooting. So if you'll be shooting on the move and weight is a concern, maybe we're back to looking at the AR-platform. :scrutiny:

.308 Pig Riffle ... maybe?
CIMG1515.jpg

Food for thought ... :cool:
 
Last edited:
I, like Texas Patriot, live in hog country and over the years have shot them with many calibers from .22LR to a .348. I too consider them vermin as they totally disrupt the ecology. I've killed dozens with .22LR including some big boars. It is usually not a one shot kill on the big ones. I'd say a .223/5.56 is a minimum caliber if wanting to recover your pig. I use 62gr and 64gr sp for good results.

I'd think a Ruger .44mag semi-auto carbine would be good and fun in brush . Easy to carry and fast on target. But no advantage over an AR style weapon.

I'd go AR and then you select your caliber that you like but the 6.8 would be hard to beat if you'd want carcass recovery and less recoil. If eradication is the goal then slightly heavier loads in 5.56 will kill. 7.62/.308 if you want to plant 'em where they stand.


Some of the boys around here though prefer dogs and a 10"-12" blade only!
 
"Savage Mod 11 Hog Hunter", made just for that , just do a search for Savage Hog Hunter.
 
That said, I largely agree with the points Tirod made that favor using an AR-based platform, regardless of what cartridge it's chambered for (5.56, 6.8, 7.62, et al). ARs have made substantial in-roads into hunting, both statistically and in terms of credibly demonstrating that the platform has a legitimate "sporting purpose" (if that was ever needed under the Second Amendment ... )

...

Savage, of course, has come out with a line of hog-killing bolt guns, but after putting on a scope and sling (even w/o a bipod or can), I have to believe they're going to be a bit weighty for other than stationary shooting. So if you'll be shooting on the move and weight is a concern, maybe we're back to looking at the AR-platform.

LOL, you were doing so well there for a while. Generally speaking, it is much easier to come up with a lightweight bolt gun than a lightweight AR15 or AR10. Savage's hog rifle in .308 is 7.25 lbs and their lightweight hunter in .223 or .308 is just 5.5 lbs. A stripped down AR10 is about 8.5-9.0. So put a scope, rings, bipod, can, and sling on a Savage Lightweight hunter and you are still lighter than a Rock River Arms LAR-8 with no magazine, scope, rings, bipod, or can.

You can find some darned heavy bolt guns, no doubt, but by and large if you want a lighter weight gun, going with an AR platform is not the weigh to go. Semi-auto isn't the weigh to go either.
 
In nc we can not use 223 for deer or larger game just small game. They passed suppressed hunting last year so i plan to go suppressed when money comes availible
 
My first wild hog was taken years ago when I served with USAF in northern California. I shot the animal behind the shoulder and watched in amazement as it ran off as if missed! But it toppled after a run of about 50 yards and kicked a few times. My rifle was a Glenfield 30-30 shooting 170 grain Winchester Power Point ammo.

I shot the next hogs through the head and they didn't move an inch.

TR
 
More Pig Riffle Musings ...

* * * Generally speaking, it is much easier to come up with a lightweight bolt gun than a lightweight AR15 or AR10. Savage's hog rifle in .308 is 7.25 lbs and their lightweight hunter in .223 or .308 is just 5.5 lbs. A stripped down AR10 is about 8.5-9.0. So put a scope, rings, bipod, can, and sling on a Savage Lightweight hunter and you are still lighter than a Rock River Arms LAR-8 with no magazine, scope, rings, bipod, or can.

Well, Chief, you were going good there until you balled-up 5.56mm ARs with their 7.62/.308 counterparts in the weight department. :scrutiny:

My 16" Noveske 5.56mm and my 16" LMT MRP (wearing either its 5.56mm or 300Blk barrel) are still going to be oodles lighter, and easier to manuver and shoot, than the Savage bolts, lightweight or not. They won't be wearing huge, weighty scopes, bipods or, at least for now, cans. The can on my Savage FP10 (above) is a dedicated 7.62 bolt gun can.

So, put a scope, rings, bipod, can, and sling on a Savage Lightweight hunter and you are still lighter than a Rock River Arms LAR-8 with no magazine, scope, rings, bipod, or can.

I agree with you on the weight issue regarding 7.62/.308 ARs versus truly "lightweight" bolt rifles, like, say, Kimber's "Mountain Rifle." My .308 AR is LMT's allegedly "light-weight" version of the 7.62 MRP MWS, called the LM8 "slickside" with a 16" C/L barrel. It's topped with the lightest 1x-6x scope on the market, a Leupy's Mk 6, runs a Magpul MS1 sling, has NO rails on the foreend (unless I'm running a bipod @ 6 o'clock), and it's got no can yet either - but it's still a weighty beast compared to its 5.56mm MRP sibling.

Cute on the weigh word too ... ;)

:cool:
 
Last edited:
Any center fire within reason will kill a hog. I've been using a .223 lately, but I
I've shot them with lots of calibers and never felt undergunned.
 
I think this is overthought and unnecessarily complicated. As soon as I saw the title of the thread I thought that a good lever action .30-30 is the most obvious answer. For this application I feel it has a lot going for it.
 
For both I second the 6.8 SPC AR. Great for deer at moderate ranges. With proper bullets will surely kill hogs. One fellow who worked for a pig control company in TX claimed to have killed over 200 pigs with an AR in 5.56. The SPC is a better killer.
 
I think this is overthought and unnecessarily complicated. As soon as I saw the title of the thread I thought that a good lever action .30-30 is the most obvious answer. For this application I feel it has a lot going for it.

+1 to the .30 WCF. It is more than enough, and the handling qualities are perfect for quick shot acquisition; they fly to the shoulder and swing beautifully.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    106.8 KB · Views: 29
I have to agree. I've NEVER seen a simple thread so over thought out. But then again, if you are providing accurate information in the long posts, then you're just better informing the OP. Which is what we want. OP you are getting a very complicated to answer to what, on the surface, appears to be a simple question. Let this be a lesson for next time. The more information you provide in the first post, the more simple/specific our answers can be. But something else....There is never a "Best". Only deffering levels of "Adequacy".
 
Arobbins

As you can see from all the posts you can take a hog with anything from a 17hmr to a 575 t-rex.

My opinion is, use what you can shoot the best in any reasonable centerfire caliber you own or want to own.

Simple as that.
 
bldsmith gave the best answer. Although, as per your hunting regs, some of them can't be used. Hunting in timber/swamps, you don't need a rifle or a cartridge for 400+ yard shots. But no matter the recommendations made, someone will have a rebuttal for each of them. I could say an 1895 45-70, 336 30-30 or 1894 44 mag for short range. Someone will ask "What about the 35 Remington, 444, or 308 Marlin Express?". And for every recommendation of Savage, Remington, Marlin, Howa, CZ, Winchester or Ruger in long or short action and particular chambering for longer range, someone will ask "Well why not a _____ in ______?". Then there's the differing AR/semiauto platforms. So many flavors there too. Again, a complicated answer to a seemingly simple question. Because the only wrong answer is a gun or CF cartridge that is illegal to use in your state. We all have our own favorites. But something I have complete confidence in, someone else might not. 45-70 was mentioned. I'm a huge 45-70 fan. But it's a cartridge that is best suited to hand loaders due to cost, availability, and limited selection of factory ammunition. Remember, factory load offerings are generally underpowered compared to what hand loading offers. Same with rifles. Most factory rifles can be greatly improved by doing minor modifications. But generally speaking, factory ammo and factory rifles are 100% completely adequate for hunting. The biggest variable when hunting, is the knowledge and skill of the hunter.
 
I think this is overthought and unnecessarily complicated. As soon as I saw the title of the thread I thought that a good lever action .30-30 is the most obvious answer. For this application I feel it has a lot going for it.

LOL, overthought is better than underthought. Too many folks end up making purchases based on unjustified recommendations without understanding how what they are buying is apt to suit their needs or what their other alternatives might be and the options afforded by them.
 
An sks works real well, that 7.62x39 round really punches above it's weight. The rifles solid enough to club them to death if you need to, and ammunition is readily available, I just use steel case stuff. Only drawback imo is the difficulty of mounting optics. My fav rifle out to 150 yds used to be a 3030 but the sk has replaced it now.
 
All the calibers mentioned will work, I find the 6.5x55 ideal for hogs, hits about like a .308 with much less blast and kick. It also worked pretty good on a cow elk I shot in January for that matter.
 
I'm on a hog hunt right now with my daughter. My walking around gun is a win '94 trapper .30-30, Remmy 170gr corlokt ammo.

If we decide to sit a blind, I will take my 40+ year old 336, Leupold 3x7x33, same ammo.

The trapper is new to me, so only 2 pigs so far this year. The marlin? I have no idea. A bunch. No run-aways. My .30-30's always do the job, and are a joy to tote and shoot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top