Pirates Beware: Soon Rifles That Kill from a Mile Away (TIME magazine article)

Status
Not open for further replies.

FourTeeFive

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
1,078
Location
PNW WA
The usual fluff stuff from TIME, but I hadn't heard about this:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1891348,00.html

Wednesday, Apr. 15, 2009

Pirates Beware: Soon Rifles That Kill from a Mile Away

By Mark Thompson / Washington

The three Navy SEAL snipers who killed the pirates off the coast of Somalia last weekend were lucky the buccaneers were gullible enough to allow their lifeboat to be towed farther out to sea by the U.S.S. Bainbridge. The shortened towline turned what could have been a trio of difficult shots across hundreds of yards of ocean into relatively easy 30-yd. pops. It's a safe bet future pirates won't be so naive. But the Pentagon is drawing up a project to make it easier to hit targets at much longer distances: a super-sniper rifle called the EXACTO, short for EXtreme ACcuracy Tasked Ordnance.

The highly-classified EXACTO program began a year ago, when the U.S. military's band of scientists and engineers at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) — which played a key role in the creation of both the Internet and GPS — let the military-industrial complex know it was seeking a supergun. "The ability to more accurately prosecute targets at significantly longer range would provide a dramatic new capability to the U.S. military," DARPA'S solicitation for bids said. "The use of an actively controlled bullet will make it possible to counter environmental effects such as crosswinds and air density, and prosecute both stationary and moving targets while enhancing shooter covertness." (See pictures of dramatic pirate-hostage rescues.)

The new .50 caliber gun and improved scope could employ "fire and forget" technologies including "fin-stabilized projectiles, spin-stabilized projectiles, internal and/or external aero-actuation control methods, projectile guidance technologies, tamper proofing, small stable power supplies, and advanced sighting, optical resolution and clarity technologies." In other words, bullets that, once fired at a specific target, fly themselves into it by changing shape. The new gun should be no heavier than the combined 46-lb. weight of the current $11,500 M107 sniper rifle and all its associated gear (including ammo, tripod, scope and slide rules for target calculations). (See pictures of the brazen pirates of Somalia.)

In November, DARPA awarded Lockheed Martin $12.3 million and Teledyne Scientific & Imaging $9.5 million to begin work on the new weapon. If various technical hurdles are cleared, it could be available sometime around 2015.

DARPA says the Pentagon needs the vastly improved rifle because the use of snipers has ballooned from 250 to 800 annually. The sharpshooters require extensive and expensive training — all of which could be reduced with a better gun. Snipers "are unable to take a shot the vast majority of the time" because of wind or other weather factors, and a lack of confidence in their ability to hit the target or flee if detected. Those shortcomings could be greatly reduced by the new longer-range rifle. How much longer range? "Specific system performance objectives (e.g., range, accuracy and target speed) are classified," the solicitation said. (See pictures of America's gun culture.)

Army Captain Keith Bell, former commander of the Army sniper school at Fort Benning, Ga., can't wait to get his hands on the new rifle. "The EXACTO would be revolutionary," he says. "It will more than double our range and probably more than double our accuracy." Current sniper rifles can regularly hit trucks at 2,000 meters, but not bad guys. (The record kill is 2,430 meters, just over 1.5 miles. It was charted by Canadian army corporal Rob Furlong against a Taliban fighter in Afghanistan's Shah-i-kot valley during Operation Anaconda in March 2002 — but his first two shots missed.) "There's no limit as far as I can see so long as the bullet's stable — I think 2,000 or 2,500 meters is very attainable," Bell says.

"Right now, anything past around 800 meters is an extremely tough shot," he added during a satellite telephone interview from Mosul, Iraq. "But this EXACTO will take the effects of wind, elevation and humidity all out of play." Bell spends his days training Iraqis as snipers and for other elements of the martial arts. Did he hear about what the Navy snipers did on Sunday? "Sure did," he said. "I'm jealous as hell."
 
The Army has had guns that kill from over a mile away for some time.

They are known as mortars and field pieces.

The M777 Howitzer does all the stuff described in the article while delivering considerably more destructive power at considerably further distance than this "EXACTO" gun -- a solution in search of a problem if ever I've seen one.
 
The M777 Howitzer does all the stuff described in the article while delivering considerably more destructive power at considerably further distance than this "EXACTO" gun -- a solution in search of a problem if ever I've seen one.

Yes, because nothing says "hostage rescue at long distance" quite like saturating the location with area-of-effect mortar or artillery fire.

attachment.php
 
Bit of a tricky shot though, eh? A mile long shot from a bobbing boat to a moving target on another boat - also bobbing. Not to mention curvature of the earth, air density and, of course, wind.
 
Justin: "Yes, because nothing says "hostage rescue at long distance" quite like saturating the location with area-of-effect mortar or artillery fire."

That little pirate drama was a one-shot deal, pun intended. The manufacturer of the Exacto-gun undoubtedly jumped on the opportunity to publicize his creation. Odds of a recurrence of that precise incident, in which, you will notice, existing rifles performed just fine, are small.

Our armed forces and the politicians who issue their rules of engagement have become entirely too reticent in the use of heavy firepower. With current sensibilities, we'd still be staring up at Monte Cassino, taking fire. The Falaise Pocket would be the Sixty Years War.
 
Justin said:
Yes, because nothing says "hostage rescue at long distance" quite like saturating the location with area-of-effect mortar or artillery fire.

That made me laugh. It's so going in my sig.
 
I imagine this will end up being a servo controlled gun with computerized aiming system that will have the ability to compensate for the kind of factors that would make such shots extremely difficult for a human to do manually with a traditional rifle.

I'm skeptical that this will end up with some sort of .50 cal bullet with an internal guidance system and some sort of self-propulsion to aide it.
 
A mile long shot from a bobbing boat to a moving target on another boat - also bobbing. Not to mention curvature of the earth, air density and, of course, wind

Don't forget the ability to bring down aircraft, crumble buildings and kill 10 men with a single shot. If your not convinced just ask Waxman, Feinstein or Schumer.
 
Maybe they can open up some Long John Silver restaurants over in Somalia so they can have gainful employment.
 
It sounds like we are wasting money on new toys for the military.

Remember when the captain jumped overboard? Why didnt they just grease the pirate boat at that point with plain old machine gun fire?

What would be wrong with allowing cargo ships to have private security on board? Does maritime law prevent this? If so, it would be cheaper on taxpayers to get the law changed, than invent new weapon systems to fight piracy.
 
Don't we already have rifles that can fire over a mile and a half?
That is right we do! 2,430 meters 2,657 yd, or 1.51 miles. 50 cal! Rob Furlong total alpha!
 
Ya sure LOL

It took the govt 3 days to make the lights turn on in the stadium during the katrina incident, u really think this is gonna go through?
 
Sadly, this'll probably be on the chopping block for DoD budget cuts.

It is a very interesting concept though and hopefully they can use what's learned there to modify existing designs.
 
That sounds cool, but I doubt it will get enough funding.

That's a new phrase: "prosecute targets."
 
When the military gets some super high-powered small arm, we in the liberal media will tell you how awesome it is.

When a civilian gets some small arms that are near military grade, but not really, we at the liberal media will be ready to tell you all how scary this whole situation is, and what you can do to ensure this isn't allowed to happen anymore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top