Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Pocket Revolver Smaller Than J-Frame?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Low Budget Shooter, Apr 23, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Low Budget Shooter

    Low Budget Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    160
    Location:
    Texahoma
    Dear THR Revolver Guys,

    I know the 642 or similar is the model most often recommended for pocket carry. The NAA mini revolver is genius, but of course its greatest strength, the tiny size, is its greatest weakness, as it is difficult to shoot quickly and well, and fires a .22 round.

    Is there anything that lands between these? I pretty much know what's available new, but what about the old stuff?

    Have you handled an old Colt Pocket Positive? How much smaller are they than a j-frame?

    Is an original S&W 30 any smaller?

    What's out there?

    Thanks!

    LBS
     
  2. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    NAA might have answered this question with a top break .32, but the project was scrapped. Now, they've scaled it to a .22 mag top break, it seems, rumors coming out of NAA at various industry shows. It is not yet on the market, of course. I've seen a picture claimed to be it.
     
  3. heyjoe

    heyjoe Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Messages:
    286
    an i frame pre model 30 is smaller than a j frame. i have one. it weighs around 18 ounces. it is not significantly smaller than a j frame though. about a half inch in height and length.
     
  4. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,264
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    Little 5-shot .32 S&W or .32 S&W long top breaks, like my Iver-Johnson safety automatic:

    [​IMG]

    But those cartridges are even less powerful than the .32 ACP.

    As MCgunner mentioned, Sandy Chisholm scrapped the NAA .32 H&R mini revolver project that might have been the answer you're looking for (it was kinda ugly).

    At this time, anything in the more respectable .32 H&R or fire-breathing .327 Federal is gonna be a J-frame/SP-101 sized gun or larger, holding 6 or more shots.

    Honestly, if you find a J-frame too big, you probably need to start looking at automatics like the P3AT/LCP/TCP/P380.
     
  5. Clifford

    Clifford Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    628
    Location:
    Arizona
    Try the NAA with holster grip on it. Makes the gun much easier to shoot and it's still 1/2 the size of a j frame.
     
  6. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    The old Colt pocket positive 32 is quite small but...

    you would have to cut the barrel shorter and it is an anemic caliber. With all the new materials such as scandium and titanium metals one would think they would come up with a new smaller frame than the I or J frame guns in a 32 H&R magnum in a 10 ounce gun. Just a thought.
     
  7. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I found a pic I saved of that new NAA they're developing. :D

    [​IMG]


    I found my answer in a NAA super companion with folding holster grip, personally. I like it better than the .22 mag, load with 2.0 grains Bullseye volume measured and use NAA's 30 grain bullet. It pushes around 1250 fps from the 1 5/8" barrel. I've got a spare magazine for a reload. I don't often need to carry it, but I have it if I need it. A J frame normally will fit in MY pockets, but there are times I want ultimate concealment.
     
  8. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    BTW, if they bring it out, I'll add that top brake to my small NAA collection. :D
     
  9. RevolvingGarbage

    RevolvingGarbage Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,031
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    It just does not seem like there is enough steel below that cylinder. I know its a .22mag and when fired there's plenty of strength provided by the latch and all, but when its open I'm betting it wouldn't take a grand amount of force to bend that frame or break it outright.

    It does look cool as hell though. I do hope I'm wrong about the frame as I would love to pick one up when they come out!
     
  10. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I guess if you ran over it with the lawn mower, maybe, but that is stout steel on the ordinary NAAs. I figure the folding grip will protect it from bangs, too. Does on mine.
     
  11. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    The NAA Black Widow is a .22 Mag. slightly larger than the mini-revolvers. I've been eyeing one of these for a backup myself. But it still only a .22 and is not a double action.
     
  12. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I'd as soon have a .22 mag as a .32 Long or ACP. About the same pop, even from short barrels. Single action doesn't bother me, either. Anything more than .32 long, I'm afraid, is going to take a J frame's strength. I think NAA must have figured out that even the .32 long was a little much for a top break mini revolver. That's just a guess, not real sure why the scrapped the project.
     
  13. Clifford

    Clifford Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    628
    Location:
    Arizona
    Mcgunner, one of my recent blue press magazines had the pic's of that NAA revo. I've been lusting after one the moment I saw it. No info of NAA's site about it thou I'm wondering when it will be released.
     
  14. mec

    mec Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,458
    I saw that blue press picture too and e-mailed the president. he told me that the project is in early stages and, if it pans out, it will almost certainly be after the end of this year.

    i've been chronographing loads through a 1 5/8" bbl 22m. Several loads are from a project I did in 2003 and I bought some "fresh" ammo for comparison. The velocities are higher than those published on the Naa site (as were some long rifle rounds i clocked through one of those Naa revolvers a while back)
    Winchester Wester 40 grain JHP- Original load
    Velocity 1027 fps Energy 94 ft lbs (10) H: 1044 L: 972

    CCI Maxi Mag TNT 30 grain jhp
    From 2003 Velocity: 1117 Energy 83 ft l bs (10) H: 1126/ L: 1098

    From 2010 Velocity: 1155 Energy 89 ft/lbs (5) HL 1214/L: 1101

    CCI Maxi Mag FMJ 40 grain
    From 2003 Velocity: 1038 Energy 96 ft/lbs (5) H: 1071 L: 976
    From 2010 Velocity: 1017 Energy 92 ft/lbs (5) H: 1049 L: 990

    Remington 40 grain JHP
    Velocity 995 Energy 88 ft/lbs (10) H: 1029 L: 967

    Two rounds of WW supreme 34 grain jhp
    1050 and 1421=case head separated and cylinder locked up- discontinued
    [​IMG]
    The TNT shot into gallon water jugs.


    [​IMG]
    five shots two handed from nine feet/ five shots one handed from 15 feet. The gun brough up and fired as soon as the front sight covered the desired point of impact.

    The velocities of these loads is in the range of performance of 6 inch and Ruger Security Sixes and K22s with 36 grain long rifle hollow points and the bullet expansion of the TNT is profound enough to indicate that it should show expansion in tissue. The loads that clock in the 1000_+ fps range with 40 grain bullets should penetrate better and might be a sensible choice for those who don't trust a 30 grain bullet at trans sonic velocities to penetrated deep enough. The traditional ww jhp or the jhps from CCI will not expand in any media until the velocity is a few hundred feet per second faster than available from the NAA.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2010
  15. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,264
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    Agreed. Damaging that frame would definitely have to be intentional, not from normal use and carry.

    My chrono results with my 1-5/8" mini folder .22 Mag. mirror mec's, running 80-95 ft/lbs. At 130 ft/lbs, the .32 long/new police and .32 ACP have a good bit more energy. 40 ft/lbs isn't much when comparing larger cartridges, but in these little guys that are scraping for every ounce to get decent performance, a ~45% increase is noteworthy.
     
  16. Deltaboy

    Deltaboy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    6,262
    Location:
    Texas
    NICE!!!! I would like to get one.
     
  17. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    120 to 140 lbs is inadequate to make a lot of difference IMHO from 100 ft lbs. What I'm more interested in is comparisons in penetration. I don't have a .32, though. Closest I can come is a .31 pocket remington which pushes a 60 grain bullet, conical cast, to about 900 fps with a full, compressed charge of 777. That bullet is very pointy and should penetrate well, much better than anything that might expand. I don't have a .22 mag NAA, yet, but I get 1250 fps with 2.0 grains of Bullseye behind NAA's 30 grain conical in my NAA Super Companion. I only get about 800 fps from my .22LR NAA shooting 36 grain Federal. TOO, I bought a spare cylinder for the Super Companion to be used for a quick reload, "quick" being relative. It's MUCH quicker than pulling the cylinder, dumping the cases, loading one at a time. No, it's not a 1911. :rolleyes: I have a folding holster grip on the gun. I very much like this little gun, can hit a paper plate from 15 yards off hand slow fire and at 15 feet it's pretty quick to point shoot.Sure, I'd rather be carrying one of my real calibers, but this is a thread about smaller than J frames and these guns have a very real self defense application in a modern society. We can't all run around with our P model Colts strapped on these days.

    I'm saving milk bottles and stuffing them with news paper. I've got five stuffed at the moment and another ready to stuff. The day before I do my testing, I plan to fill the jugs with water. Then, I'll dump the water before loading up for the range trip. I think this will better simulate jello than does water bottles. Water is very hard, the surface tension thing. Just belly flop off the high dive sometime to get the idea. But, the main thing, the wet news print in bottles is easy to transport and can take more'n a couple of shots before all the media drains out and it's useless. I got this idea watching youtube vids of penetration tests. So long as I'm just comparing different loads for penetration in the same media, I think it will be relevant. I'm not sure anything short of 10 percent ballistic gelatin can relate much as to bullet expansion, but I'm just interested, with these little calibers, in penetration potential via testing them in a similar media. I really don't think expansion in calibers this small is desirable, anyway, if it limits penetration. There's simply not enough energy to waste. I say that about .380 and it's pushing 200 ft lbs. I guess if the little rounds had any sectional density if would be different, but they don't.

    Just my thoughts on the subject. I've yet to do the penetration stuff. I've had a lot of bad things going on in my life that have kept me busy, but hope to get around to it soon because I'm curious. I also want to shoot some traditional calibers like 9x19+P JHP and especially a 94 grain 9x18 Makarov into these bottles. I'll do that last. Might not be enough left of the bottles if I do it first. :D
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2010
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page