(4v50 Gary) Now, if the bill was only $50 and then jumped up to $300 without any extra kids and then a new car, new clothes, more eating out and higher lifestyle with no viable means of paying, that should trigger an investigation.
I don't know if you are asking a "legal" question, but in a free country there is no reason that economic transactions between me and some other person should be state-monitored. One's use of electricity harms no one and should be private no matter what some "law" says. Would you say the same thing about your alcoholic beverage or birth-control expenditures? Do you want faceless bureaucrats armed with such intimate knowledge? I certainly don't.(Art Eatman) mercedesrules, what's private about a utility bill?
Umm...because they believe in liberty? Jeez, Art, do you really want this level of government monitoring?Reloader, if all but one of the 3/2/2 houses in a neighborhood are running $300 a month for electricity, and that one is $600 or $1,000 or whatever, why wouldn't somebody be curious about what's going on?
How nice of them Do you really want to live in a society where "discreet snooping" is the norm? I'm frankly shocked that anyone on this board, much less a moderator, is so authoritarian.I'm more in favor of some discreet "snooping", rather than rushing off to get a warrant, but at least the Carlsbad cops were polite and didn't do the midnight marauder thing.
Do you mean to say we are already in a police state, or that too many people already want to live in one? I only meant that, regardless of whether we live in one currently or not, most people would rather not live in a police state, as a general principle. I agree that our society is quickly transforming into one around us, and that too many people seem apathetic about it. Sort of reminds one of the Invasion of the Body Snatchers. You can't tell who the real Americans are anymore, and you wonder if you are one of the only ones left.Too late.
What do surrounding houses have to do with anything? I can see mansions using more electricity than apartments due to more lights and air conditioning load. For the most part, houses do not use electricity, people do.Reloader, if all but one of the 3/2/2 houses in a neighborhood are running $300 a month for electricity, and that one is $600 or $1,000 or whatever, why wouldn't somebody be curious about what's going on?
Reloader, if all but one of the 3/2/2 houses in a neighborhood are running $300 a month for electricity, and that one is $600 or $1,000 or whatever, why wouldn't somebody be curious about what's going on?
I also do not think $300 is a lot, I know a lot of computer nerds who use a lot more.
Reloader, if all but one of the 3/2/2 houses in a neighborhood are running $300 a month for electricity, and that one is $600 or $1,000 or whatever, why wouldn't somebody be curious about what's going on?
As you might have guessed, I'm strongly against the "war on drugs". Therefore, I don't recognize any need to enter or search someone's private property unless there is a complaining, injured victim of theft (or some other real crime) and there is probable cause that his stolen goods (or his attacker) are at the target property.(4v50 Gary) But if it is one of several leads that is highly suggestive of illegal activity such that the totality of circumstances would lead a reasonable officer (and not the over-eager stormtrooper) to have probable cause, then a warranted search is merited
To which most public educated folk will respond; "Ernst who!"I point out that they'll get the same reward Ernst Rhome got for helping Hitler that time long ago.
I could agree with using a "suspicious" electric usage to be used as additional evidence to get a search warrant ... but that would be in addition to an undercover officer arranging to buy pot from the suspects or something equally damning ... not this "profiling" crap.But if it is one of several leads that is highly suggestive of illegal activity such that the totality of circumstances would lead a reasonable officer (and not the over-eager stormtrooper) to have probable cause, then a warranted search is merited
Great point.Curiosity is NOT probable cause. Suspicion is not probable cause.
And we have way too many warrants being issued on flimsy 'evidence' back up by anonymous informants.
Another great point. Prohibition doesn't work in a free society. Inevitably the society becomes a police state as the power of the police and the state are for ever increased, step by step, without end, in an effort to finally win a war that cannot be won without having the kind of society that no one wants to live in.I could agree with using a "suspicious" electric usage to be used as additional evidence to get a search warrant ... but that would be in addition to an undercover officer arranging to buy pot from the suspects or something equally damning ... not this "profiling" crap.
Although I must admit, mercedesrules has the right idea ... lets can this stupid drug "war" before any more get hurt.