mrming
Member
Poll: Does the FLSA need reforming so salaried no longer means free overtime?
I've been out of college for about 3 years now, and worked at a couple of fairly large corporations. I have a science degree, and in every instance my work directly contributed to the companies bottom line. I've never seen a work week less than 40 hours. Most of mine have averaged 48 or so, and that was only because I was brave enough to get up and walk out. Coworkers were typically putting in 60-70 per.
so my question is, can someone explain to me how this is right? Professional hourly workers get paid at a flat rate until they surpass 40 hours; enjoy similiar benifits and in some cases enjoy more protection from lay-offs than I have. Then they get paid more, for doing what is considered obligatory for me.
To me, its not about doing a job. I was hired under a certain job title and knew nothing about the actual job details. I was reorganized at whim, and job duties added until overtime was manditory to complete even a fraction of what was assigned. If I was hired to do a job, or certain task and it was spelled out I could understand.. but thats not how it works. I am required to sit in a room, in a box, performing any and all tasks until completion.
If the task was specificly spelled out and I could recover any time not spent on it.. it'd make sense. But as it is, it seems quite insane.
Anyone care to chime in and enlighten me? Or at least vote your opinion?
I've been out of college for about 3 years now, and worked at a couple of fairly large corporations. I have a science degree, and in every instance my work directly contributed to the companies bottom line. I've never seen a work week less than 40 hours. Most of mine have averaged 48 or so, and that was only because I was brave enough to get up and walk out. Coworkers were typically putting in 60-70 per.
so my question is, can someone explain to me how this is right? Professional hourly workers get paid at a flat rate until they surpass 40 hours; enjoy similiar benifits and in some cases enjoy more protection from lay-offs than I have. Then they get paid more, for doing what is considered obligatory for me.
To me, its not about doing a job. I was hired under a certain job title and knew nothing about the actual job details. I was reorganized at whim, and job duties added until overtime was manditory to complete even a fraction of what was assigned. If I was hired to do a job, or certain task and it was spelled out I could understand.. but thats not how it works. I am required to sit in a room, in a box, performing any and all tasks until completion.
If the task was specificly spelled out and I could recover any time not spent on it.. it'd make sense. But as it is, it seems quite insane.
Anyone care to chime in and enlighten me? Or at least vote your opinion?