Posse Comitatus Act=restricts confiscation?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know. I'm retired military myself. We used to train for riot control duty back in the late 60's and early 70's. Most of us took the training pretty seriously and were more than willing to, within legal limits, kick butts.
:cool:

Kent State.
 
Does anybody remember the seige at Ruby Ridge and Waco?

Nothing to worry about. The Dems will never attack and murder men, women and children for alleged weapons possession. Don't be paranoid. As long as you are a Muslim terrorist, Eco-terrorist Mexican military or gang banger, they won't touch you. If you breach the border with armor, running drugs, you will be let go. It is only those terrible law-abiding Christian gun owners with single shot .22s that will be targeted and destroyed by military forces in the name of domestic security. And what in the world is wrong with that?

Shooter429
 
hmm has anyone heard of the us soldiers permanently station on us soil to deal with riots and such
 
The Seige at Ruby Ridge and Waco.

Let's see - this Seige at Ruby Ridge?

Randy Weaver, a former Iowa factory worker, and his wife and children moved to northern Idaho during the 1980s in order to "home-school his children and escape what he and his wife Vicki saw as a corrupted world".[1] In January 1985, the US Secret Service investigated allegations that Weaver had made threats against the President and other government officials. While the Secret Service was told that Weaver was a member of the Aryan Nations and had a large weapons cache at his residence, Weaver denied the allegations and no charges were filed.[2] Weaver later filed an affidavit with the county clerk that he believed that he may have to defend himself and his family from an FBI attack.[2]
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms first became aware of Weaver in July 1986 when he was introduced to an ATF informant at a meeting of the Aryan Nations. Weaver had been invited by Frank Kumnick, who was the original target of the ATF investigation. Over the next three years, Weaver and the informant met several times.[2] In October 1989, the ATF claims that Weaver sold the informant two sawed-off shotguns, with the barrels shortened beyond the legal limit set by federal law. Weaver denied this, claiming agents purchased legal shotguns from Weaver and later shortened the barrels themselves. In June 1990, ATF agents attempted to have Weaver act as an informant for their investigation into the Aryan Nations organization. When Weaver refused, the ATF filed charges in June 1990 and a federal grand jury later indicted him in December 1990 for the sale of the illegal weapons in October 1989.[2]
ATF agents posed as broken-down motorists and arrested Randy and Vicki Weaver when they stopped to assist. Randy Weaver was told of the charges against him, released on bail, and told his trial would begin on 19 February 1991. Two weeks later, the trial date changed to 20 February, but the U.S. Probation Office sent out a letter which stated the date as 20 March. Weaver did not appear on the correct trial date, and the judge issued a warrant for his arrest. On 14 March a grand jury, which the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) had not informed of the incorrect date in the letter, indicted Weaver for failing to appear on the correct trial date.[2]
Weaver, distrustful of the federal government, refused to leave his cabin. U.S. Marshals Service officers made a series of attempts to have Weaver surrender peacefully. Marshals exchanged messages with Weaver through intermediaries several times until the US Attorney directed that all negotiations would go through Weaver's court-appointed counsel; however, Weaver did not have any contact with the attorney and refused to talk with him. Marshals then began preparing plans to capture Weaver to stand trial on the weapons charges and his failure to appear at the correct trial date.[2] Surveillance teams were dispatched and cameras were set up to record activity at Weaver's residence. Marshals observed that Weaver and his family responded to vehicles and other visitors by taking up armed positions around the cabin until the visitors were recognized.[2]

Yea - ZERO frickin sympathy for the guy. Zero at all.

Waco?

You mean the F-ing crazies who thought the world was going to end, and took up positions and fired over a damn search warrant?

Sorry guy - but again, ZERO sympathy whatsoever.

Fact of the matter is - we have a legal system in this country. LAW ABIDING CITIZENS avail themselves of that system. Those who choose to open fire on LE simply because their tin foil hats are on too tight - sorry, but you're exactly the reason why life is hard on the rest of us.
 
hmm has anyone heard of the us soldiers permanently station on us soil to deal with riots and such

That just started, and from what I understand - it's not to deal with riots, it's to deal with potential attacks against the US.
 
meef -- Kent State was National Guard--PC doesn't apply
My point was not so much whether PC was relevant, but speaking to the concept of:

We used to train for riot control duty back in the late 60's and early 70's. Most of us took the training pretty seriously and were more than willing to, within legal limits, kick butts.
Willing to kick butts indeed. Forget the legal limits part when emotions get supercharged. The "willingness" part tends to override everything else.

Unfortunately.
 
Willing to kick butts indeed. Forget the legal limits part when emotions get supercharged. The "willingness" part tends to override everything else.

The same applies to local LEOs
 
Sinixstar.... I'm guessing that you drink way too much coffee.

Not at all - but to cite criminals and crazies who actively planned action against law enforcement - as some sort of justification to one's paranoia is not going to get a kind reaction from me.
 
Not at all - but to cite criminals and crazies who actively planned action against law enforcement - as some sort of justification to one's paranoia is not going to get a kind reaction from me.
Well, I'm not going to get in a prolonged urinating contest here - but I honestly have to say you tend to exhibit a far less than stellar command of the details on some of these issues you take such a passionate position on.

But that's your right.
 
FWIW Randy Weaver may have possibly saved my life once. It was from a group of his nutjob buddies that thought I said something diferently than I did. He shut them up and shook my hand. The guy seems OK but he hangs with some fruitcakes.
 
I think it has become clear that our government thinks that the laws are for us, and not them. Announcing 20,000 troops to be deployed domestically immediately following the robbery of trillions of dollars by our government(TARP), on behalf of banks, and with us headed toward depression should alarm anyone who is paying attention.
 
I think it has become clear that our government thinks that the laws are for us, and not them. Announcing 20,000 troops to be deployed domestically immediately following the robbery of trillions of dollars by our government(TARP), on behalf of banks, and with us headed toward depression should alarm anyone who is paying attention.

They didn't just announce it.
 
I didnt read every comment. I read half the first page and got discusted. I can't believe the things you people are advocating.

Do you people know what the purpose of the NATIONAL GUARD is? Apparently not.
 
I didnt read every comment. I read half the first page and got discusted. I can't believe the things you people are advocating.

Do you people know what the purpose of the NATIONAL GUARD is? Apparently not

I don't think anybody's *advocating* anything. Somebody asked a question - some of us tried to answer.
 
I think with the impending economic doom on the horizon, it is a good idea to have those 20,000 troops home and ready to suppress any unrest or insurrection that may ensue. We are not the same country we were 100 years ago, and the next Great Depression will be much more violent than the first. We are no longer as culturally monolithic as we were. We are not as self reliant, and do not accept responsibility as much as in the past. We have become a culture who expects to have whatever they want whenever they want it. When money gets low, I believe people will have little regard for law and order.

A case in point is the tragedy at the Wal Mart in Long Island this past weekend. A man was trampled to death by unruly shoppers who broke down a door just to save a few bucks on a Wii.

Bush has wanted to have these 20,000 troops here already. Its not a new idea.
 
A case in point is the tragedy at the Wal Mart in Long Island this past weekend. A man was trampled to death by unruly shoppers who broke down a door just to save a few bucks on a Wii.

I dunno - they had 50" plasma screens for $799, and 10MP cameras for $69. And I mean, come on - DVD's for $9.
Guy shoulda known better then to be in front of those doors.
:rolleyes:
 
Well

With Waco, Koresh could easily have been taken in town. The Feds let it become the slaughter it was. Unproven allegations, fire and a huge concrete cap concluded the investigation.
With Ruby Ridge it could have been handled differently -and not started at all without officials trying to entrap/entice Weaver.
We can talk about the Union army torturing Southerners in prison.
http://thomaslegion.net/campmorton.html
The heavy handedness of the government of WWI American war vets in the "Bonus army" http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/snprelief4.htm
and there are may more examples.

Power corrupts and history is written by the victor. There are as many folks in denial about what the government is doing and is capable of as there are those saying "conspiracy" on this board. The key is to discuss these issues and be vigilant and not constantly scream "tin foil hat". Try to discuss these issues that have a bearing on 2A with an open idea and acceptance from both sides and we may learn something.
 
With Waco, Koresh could easily have been taken in town. The Feds let it become the slaughter it was. Unproven allegations, fire and a huge concrete cap concluded the investigation.

Waco wasn't about arresting Koresh. It was about executing a search warrant on the property. Aside from the fact that there was no legal grounds to "take Koresh in town" - even if they had, what end would that have served to the search warrant?

As for "unproven allegations" Pretty sure search warrants are a means of gathering evidence as part of the due process to prove or disprove various allegations.

With Ruby Ridge it could have been handled differently -and not started at all without officials trying to entrap/entice Weaver.
It could have also been handled differently had Weaver decided not to respond to police with an aggressive posture, and hole up in his cabin.

I don't disagree that police and the government use some pretty heavy handed tactics. Fact of the matter is - in our society there is an existing framework for addressing those instances - should people choose to take advantage of it. Even when using those obscene tactics, the authorities will mostly make sure they are acting with some legal coverage. If private citizens decide to say screw the system, and take matters into their own hands - what exactly do you expect the outcome to be?
I cry tin foil hat when people look at situations like Waco and Ruby and jump up and down screaming about injustice and this and that. Was the government heavy handed? Perhaps. They were also dealing with people known to be well armed, and known to have an itch for taking on the government. Should perhaps the warrants been executed by 1 or 2 local PD's knocking on the door and asking to look around?
Again, in the society we live in - you can either choose to live within the law, or you can choose not to. If you choose not to - guess what's gonna happen. If that choice comes at a time when you've got an army of armed federal agents outside your door - well, so much the worst I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top