Power Custom half cock hammer/trigger kit for Rugers

Status
Not open for further replies.

CraigC

Sixgun Nut
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
24,043
Location
West Tennessee
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea that the Ruger/Colt half cock action is faster to manipulate, much faster. It gives you a place to stop and you don't have to use your eyeballs to reload. There is no adapting to the equipment when the design is not conducive to fast work.

I got a Power Custom half cock conversion kit when they first came out. They currently reside in my Buckeye .38-40/10mm convertibe. The parts are very high quality, forged and case hardened. The parts just dropped in and actually work very well. Not quite a Colt or Old Model but it works pretty damned good. I also think there's no point in doing the freespin pawl with the half cock conversion. Those are two different solutions to the same problem. I have another half cock Bisley kit waiting for my flat-top .44Spl when it goes to the gunsmith.

I guess you could buy another gun but last I checked, the half cock kit was a lot less expensive and accomplishes the same thing.
 
Howdy

I have the Power Custom half cock hammers and triggers in three 'original model' Vaqueros.

This Stainless Vaquero and the blued one under it both have the half cock hammers in them.

I have one more stainless Vaquero with a 5 1/2" barrel with the half cock hammer, but it appears to be a bit camera shy.

po3PsEOij.jpg




The hammer is at half cock in this photo of one of my Stainless Vaqueros. Notice how nicely the chamber lines up with the loading gate.

pl4h2ctpj.jpg




Anyone who has ever shot one of the 'original model' Vaqueros or a New Model Blackhawk will eventually run into the situation where the cylinder gets rotated just a tad too far, and the hand clicks into the next ratchet tooth on the cylinder. This leaves a chamber slightly out of alingment and it is impossible to load or empty that chamber without going all the way around again. I got annoyed enough at this situation that I put the Half Cock hammers and triggers into my three 'original model' Vaqueros. The blued one was the first revolver I was shooting in CAS, then came the long barreled stainless one, and finally the 5 1/2" Stainless Vaquero. It has been close to 20 years ago now since I put in the half cock hammers, I seem to recall the kit with trigger and lighter Wolff springs cost about $180 back then. Yes, it was a lot to spend to prevent annoyance, but there you have it.

Unlike a Colt, when a Power Custom Half Cock hammer is installed, there are only three clicks, not four. There is no 'safety cock' notch on the hammer as there is in a Colt, so you only get three clicks. I certainly did not buy them to listen to clicks, I was tired of 'going around again' to load that one chamber.


This is a typical Ruger 'original model' Vaquero hammer. Ruger hammers are Investment Castings. After casting them they may need some secondary machining. This hammer is typical in that it is polished on the sides and back, but the recessed surface has not been polished and still shows the pebbly surface left behind from the Investment Casting process.

plaRWjjdj.jpg




Another view of the Ruger hammer, showing the pebbly surface left behind from the Investment Casting process. A parting line is also visible down the center of the part. Clearly, Ruger does not waste time and effort polishing and finishing surfaces that do not need it, or do not show very much.

pm6KyokAj.jpg




This is a photo I lifted years ago from the Power Custom website of one of their hammers. Notice the slightly different profile around the pivot hole. I think this actually makes for a slightly stronger part.

pmI0lIY7j.jpg




Notice how the front surface of the Power Custom hammer has been polished smooth.

pmbrvT0nj.jpg




The parts are very high quality, forged and case hardened.


Actually CraigC, Power Custom hammers are not forged, they are cut from bar steel by Wire EDM. (Electro Discharge Machine). At least they were when I bought them. I seem to recall I may have actually talked to Ron Power, but I may be imagining that. WIre EDM is kind of like a band saw, except instead of a saw blade there is a thin wire running over pulleys. An electrical charge burns its way through the work piece and the work piece is advanced through the wire. All controlled by CAD CAM today of course. I don't know if they are case hardened either. The 'stainless finish' parts are not stainless, they are just highly polished. Witness the corrosion on the side of that hammer at half cock in my photo, from years of shooting Black Powder cartridges. I seem to remember the 'blued' hammers were polished on the sides and the rear surface of the hammer was blued. With the 'stainless' ones they polished off the blued rear surface of the hammer.

Anyway, I liked my half cock hammers very much. Two of them dropped right in with no fitting at all. The 5 1/2" Vaquero had a very tight action. There was absolutely no play at all when the OEM hammer was cocked. After I put in the half cock hammer I could not get the hammer to go to full cock. A few strokes of a file on the hand shortened it just a teeny bit, so the hammer would go to full cock.

There are a bunch of guys in CAS who like the half cock hammers because if they short stroke their hammer, in other words let go of it before it goes to full cock, the hammer will fall to the half cock position. Then they can keep shooting and get to that chamber in turn. Not a valid reason for a half cock hammer to my mind, but that is why some like them.

Before I bought my Colts I really liked my Vaqueros with their half cock hammers. Once I bought my Colts I already knew the drill for setting the hammer to half cock and loading one, skipping one, loading four more, full cock and lower the hammer on an empty chamber.
 
Last edited:
You’re probably right about EDM but I specifically remember them telling me they were case hardened.
 
Very nice, Driftwood.

So by everyone’s estimation here are the Power Custom parts as durable as the Rugers? They won’t wear out quicker would they?
 
I agree, Craig.

With the properly indexing cylinder, one can reload the revolver in a hurry and it all but eliminates bouncing your knuckle off the ejector head as you accidently miss the holes.
Agreed.


Very nice, Driftwood.

So by everyone’s estimation here are the Power Custom parts as durable as the Rugers? They won’t wear out quicker would they?
Probably more durable.


That is one gun I don't have any decent pics of. It looks like any other blued Blackhawk, except the grip frame and ejector housing are steel and it has a better polish than usual. I used it in my holster making tutorial.

http://www.sixgunner.org/holstertutorialp1.html
 
Awesome Craig, thank you. Yesterday I put some Pachmayrs on my Blackhawk to help absorb the terrific recoil of the giant Buffalo Bore shells I have for it. They don’t fit great but are functional.

355-D2-E4-D-203-C-4902-98-A4-EA0-AE403-B796.jpg

It’s a New Model and frankly I do not like the modern action. The Power Custom parts are on the list.
 
With the New Blackhawk, a redesign from the so-called
three-screw models that aped the Colt lockwork, I
doubt Ruger ever really thought about "speed" in
reloading being a particular factor.

Indeed, I doubt many in the 19th Century thought about
"speed" all that much either. Nor did Elmer Keith give
speed much consideration either as he looked for
more powerful handgun loads.

But then boys will be boys, Hollywood would be Hollywood,
and the arts of fast draw and then cowboy action shooting
came along.

I know when I first got a Blackhawk some 50 years ago,
the idea I was buying for speed never entered my mind.
It was a hunting or survivalist tool (remember the survivalist
craze?).

And back then, happily, Ruger supplied a super strong
six-shooter that was truly a six-shooter and much safer
than the three-screws to boot.

Of course, as evident in this thread and another thread,
shooters are never quite satisfied nor happy. So now
a "retro" phase is upon us.
 
But then boys will be boys, Hollywood would be Hollywood,
and the arts of fast draw and then cowboy action shooting
came along.

I know when I first got a Blackhawk some 50 years ago,
the idea I was buying for speed never entered my mind.
It was a hunting or survivalist tool (remember the survivalist
craze?).

And back then, happily, Ruger supplied a super strong
six-shooter that was truly a six-shooter and much safer
than the three-screws to boot.

Of course, as evident in this thread and another thread,
shooters are never quite satisfied nor happy. So now
a "retro" phase is upon us.


First off, I cannot remember the last time we had a reload on the clock in CAS. Loading is done at the loading table before the shooter gets to the firing line. He fires the shooting sequence, then goes to the unloading table to unload his pistols, rifle, and shotgun. Speed in loading in CAS is a non issue.

I bought my first Blackhawk 46 years ago. The idea of buying for speed never entered my mind either. I just wanted a big, 45 caliber single action revolver and could not afford a Colt.


plZsbaNdj.jpg




I never did put any Power Custom parts in my Blackhawk, I put them in my three Vaqueros because, as I said before, I was shooting them a lot and got tired of having to "go 'round again" when I accidentally rotated the cylinder a teeny bit too far to load that chamber. "retro" had nothing to do with it, it was a purely practical modification.
 
I think it’s funny that I have a New Vaquero that indexes so that loading is easier and yet I still find a away to fumble past a chamber on occasion. I guess I have gotten so used to my original Vaqueros unmodified configuration that the new configuration throws me off sometimes. Either that or I am clumsy…sometimes.

I had debated on modifying my Vaquero, but I believe I will wait as I am thinking about adding some more single actions to my selection so maybe I will let “majority rules” dictate my actions…pun intended. ;)
 
Howdy Again

After dealing with 'going around again' with my old Blackhawk and 'original model' Vaqueros for so many years, one of the first things I noticed when I bought my first New Vaquero was this issue had been addressed.

The small spring plunger near the cylinder pin hole engages the ratchet teeth and lines up the cylinder chambers with the loading gate very nicely with a New Vaquero.

Because of this feature I have never felt the need to install half cock hammers in a New Vaquero.

pmyKPuZdj.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top