Pre season thoughts on equipment, rifles ETC..

Status
Not open for further replies.

H&Hhunter

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
13,341
From years of taking guys out either as a paid guide or just as a friend. The number one thing causes guys to miss and to generally miss out on shot opportunities is the scope they are using and how it's mounted.

Gynormous, heavy, huge, over powered target style scopes are the number one detriment to successful general hunting IMO. If you are actually hunting and not sitting in a snipers nest waiting for something to come by these types of scopes are going to handicap you severely in 99.9% of hunting situations. And they do so for several reasons.

The higher power a scope is the more narrow the field of vision the more shot opportunities you are going to miss out on. You simply cannot quickly acquire a target at anything approaching normal hunting ranges with one of these giants mounted on you rifle the field of vision is simply to narrow. I can't tell you how many elk and deer I've watched calmly trot off as our sniper wanna be frantically searches for his intended target in his target scope.

The other negative is that by default these types of scopes with massive objective bells require that they be mounted too high for a natural quick cheek weld. So you've got a double negative happening here. First your field of view is way too narrow for general hunting and second you've got to put your head up and do the funky chicken to find your cross hair because the scope is sitting high enough that it requires an unnatural head hold to find your optical center. And when you have to lift your cheek off the comb you've lost your natural third point of contact further limiting your shot stability.

A good general hunting scope should be tough, weather proof, reasonably clear and have a maximum of 3 preferably 2.5 or less power on the bottom end, the top end isn't as important, anything from about 4 to 10 power will suffice. It should have a maximum of about a 40MM objective bell so that it can be mounted as low as possible to the bore. When you bring your rifle to your shoulder all you should see is a perfectly clear picture with a cross hair in the middle of it. If you've got to do any head jiving at all to get that picture something is wrong it's most likely mounted to high, possibly to low or it is to far forward or aft but it's going to spank you at the moment of truth.

Range finders. I carry one but if as a rule of thumb if you have to use one the shot is probably to far to take. The primary use of a range finder should be to figure out that you need to get closer and not take shot. The other thing a range finder does for you is it helps in those optically tricky situations such as a cross canyon or weird lighting situation where visual range estimation becomes almost impossible. Cross canyon always looks further than it is, a range finder tell the truth. Low angle light early in the morning especially shining brightly on an animal gives the appearance of something being bigger than it is therefore making it seem closer, once again a range finder dispels that myth.

What is the maximum range to ethically take a shot at a live animal? I can't answer that with a set number. On a day when the conditions are perfect and I have a rock solid rest, the wind is calm, I am not breathing hard and am calm, my ethical shot range increases dramatically. On a day when the wind is howling and snow is falling sideways my maximum shot range is dramatically decreased. Maximum range depends on you, your level of proficiency with your chosen rifle, and environmental conditions for any given day.

The caliber and rifle is not really that important as long as it is adequate for the game you are hunting. But if you want to increase your shot opportunities using a heavy for caliber bullet that reliably penetrates deeply will do just that. If you are shooting a caliber that requires a perfect surgically delivered broadside shot behind the shoulder obviously you are severely limiting your shot opportunities.

Example a .30-06 or a 7MM with a 180Gr or a 175Gr controlled expansion bullet will traverse a big mule deer or even a cow elk length wise after hitting bone. The same in either a 150 or 140 gr ballistic tip stoked to the max will not. Obviously these are just examples as there are lots of reliable useful calibers and rifles out there.

Your mileage will vary. Good hunting this fall!:)
 
Great post H&H, one I concur with 100%.

Currently my scope on the 30-06 is dialed in at between 4 and 6X. Missed a close Kudu Bull 'cause I simply could not find him in the scope quick enough when set on 9X, it can go to 14X. Now I'm going to bolt a 3-9X40mm on the 30-06 and move the 4-14X40mm to the 6.5mm Swede as this will be used for longer range Springbuck hunts up to 350yds.

With regard to cheek weld. Probably the most underattended aspect of rifle fitment. I for one simply do not fit the standard stock, even worse are the Bavarian style stocks on my CZ550's (non American versions). I have needed to build my stock up to get perfect cheek weld. Have bought a new custom stock for the 30-06 so I can tailor fit it to my dimensions, also need longer LOP. Will be sorting out the 6.5mm after that.

Cheers
 
agreed on all of the above. the scope thing is spot on. I have 3-9 x 40s on my hunting rifles. they stay at 6 in the open and 4 in the woods. mounted low as possible.
 
I like the 3 X 9 or 3 X 10 scopes with 40 mm objectives. They are a reasonable size and go in a scabbard easy enough.

But, I'm not sure about the complaint of not being able to find the target in the scope. Since we routinely kill flying birds with no scope at all I think that if you have trouble finding a target in the scope you need to spend more time with that rifle. I'm certainly not advocating doing it, but with enough familiarity you should be able to put a bullet somewhere close or in the body of a deer at 100 yards or so with no sights of any kind.

I have spent a lot of time practicing shouldering the rifle and sighting on a target the same as you would a flying bird, rabbit etc. with a shotgun.

After a while you can get on it every time instantly at any reasonable magnification for the distance.
 
I always kind of figured that most modern hunting rifle stocks were designed with a 3-9 x 40 in mind given how common a scope set-up that seems to be; assuming the rifle was designed to be used primarily with a scope. Is there any truth to that?
 
3-9x40 here. It stays on 3x at all times, until and unless I am setting up for a long shot on a stationary animal. Then, and only then, the additional magnification comes out to play.

I would not complain about a 2-7x. It would be smaller, weigh less, and do what needs doing for a hunting rifle.
 
But, I'm not sure about the complaint of not being able to find the target in the scope. Since we routinely kill flying birds with no scope at all I think that if you have trouble finding a target in the scope you need to spend more time with that rifle.

ZJ

I think you are confusing what I mean by not being able to "find" or acquire a target in a scope verses being able to hit a target. Your reference to birds and no scopes is exactly correct with no scope you have the widest field of vision possible, with a high power target scope you a have a very narrow field of vision.

A narrow field of view makes finding your intended target very difficult and almost impossible to hit it while it's moving. A wide field of view make sit much easier.
 
I think you are confusing what I mean by not being able to "find" or acquire a target in a scope verses being able to hit a target. Your reference to birds and no scopes is exactly correct with no scope you have the widest field of vision possible, with a high power target scope you a have a very narrow field of vision.

A narrow field of view makes finding your intended target very difficult and almost impossible to hit it while it's moving. A wide field of view make sit much easier.


when i first started deer hunting i went out with a professional stalker on a paid for day. I was after fallow deer in a temperate english wood in february.... man it was cold. anyway... i had with me my trusty parker hale .30-06 equipped with a tasco golden antler scope. The maximum magnification of the scope was 24 x i had made the mistake of leaving it on 24 without any second thought... giving me a field of view like a pencil. cutting a long story short... when my chance came i missed. i had buck (well doe) fever and then couldnt find the animal and got panicky and stressed... it was expensive and embarassing... but a lesson to learn
 
What I am saying is that with practice if you see a deer or elk you should be able to throw your rifle up and be right on that target through the scope same as you can throw a shotgun right on target. If you can't see the target through the scope you shouldered your rifle aiming somewhere else. I have worked quite a bit on that because I got tired of searching around for something through a scope.

I don't have the talent to shoot a running anything with a rifle.

But, I think if most people will spend a little time picking out a rock, stump or whatever and practice shouldering their rifle on that target they can get over that searching through the scope for something pretty quickly.
 
But, I think if most people will spend a little time picking out a rock, stump or whatever and practice shouldering their rifle on that target they can get over that searching through the scope for something pretty quickly.

Or just make it easy on yourself and don't carry the rifle with scope turned way up. K.I.S.S.
 
I only own rifle with a scope on it. I use it for hunting large fields. The rest of the time I hunt with iron sights. It's been years since I have shot a deer over 50 yards away. Even when I hunt a large field the deer come out into the field close to my stand.

Binoculars are a big help spotting deer, even in close quarters. I don't know how many deer I could hear walking around my stand that I never saw until I scanned the area with binoculars. Once I spotted the deer it was easy to kill with iron sights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top