When you think of places to go to what are you thinking of? Near (under 10 miles), far (over a hundred), rural, urban? I see a good argument for staying put and another good argument for "bugging out."
Depends on the issue.
Look at a Katrina or a New Madrid earthquake sort of event. If you live someplace that can expect an event like that, where's the closest city that you have ties to that won't be affected? Friends, family? Look at the reality of Katrina. Hurricane is coming, you've got cash, fuel, and family in Dallas or Memphis. You go there, wait out the scary stuff, then head back to pick up the pieces. Beats sitting on a roof waiting for the coast guard.
SWOT is a good tool -- my MBA profs hammered me with that one.
Another good one is a
threat matrix. One axis is severity of event, the other is likelihood of occurance. This allows you to make a rational decision about where to spend effort and resources. You ignore the remote chance of occurance/low severity ones, and focus on any moderate or high severity likely to occur events. It's a basic economic tool -- economics being the study of how to deal with unlimited wants and needs in a world with limited resources. You can't plan for all events, and planning for some very unlikely events is just a waste of time, effort, and money (unless, as someone pointed out, you get
personal satisfaction from this, a resource very much indeed limited in this world and one we should all strive to obtain).
The "where to go" can be influenced by that matrix. For instance I just heard a story about a home up in the Ozarks selling for a fraction of the cost to build. It was built in the late 90s by some wealthy dot-com geek. Solar panels, hidey-holes, all the "good" stuff. But Y2K didn't happen. He spent resources making a "where to go" that was never needed.
A good, honest, threat matrix chart would indicate that. It's like the guys planning for the end of the world. Severity of event? Incredibly high. Likelihood to happen? Astonishingly small. Why then spend so much on something that isn't going to happen?
Think about what's likely to happen to
you in
your area. Fire? Tornado? Extended power outage? Riots?
Like I posted early, ice storms are not uncommon event in my area. All the folk at my volunteer fire department head to the station -- it has days worth of fuel for the back-up generator.
Edited after Thin Black Line's post:
Some
rubble here and there and a lot of services that don't work well or no longer
exisit --but life goes on.
Yep. Life goes on. Life went on in the Warsaw ghetto. Anyone who is concerned about how to survive a "big ugly" in our modern world
needs to read about the Warsaw ghetto. These horrific stories show a real life worst case scenario, that involves greed, corruption, government gone mad, the requirements for understanding when "run away" is indeed the only answer. Rubble in the streets, starvation, mass hysteria, major battles....all in a place that was once "progressive" and quite the modern civilized city.
I could say something obnoxious about "you're stupid if you don't"...but let's put it another way.
If you honestly want some food for thought about surviving a worst-case,
please read about Warsaw. It won't tell you what to pack or what skills to learn, or where to hide your bug-out-bag, but it will give you insight into the furthest reaches of the human psyche, letting you see just how "life goes on" amongst the rubble and the dead.