preference for carry ammo

Status
Not open for further replies.

dagerv

Member
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
114
I have a s&w 340 m&p and am debating whether to carry 158 gr or 125 gr loads. I am not recoil shy but wanted to hear from folks with many more years experience in the firearms world on their preference and why. Also as opposed to modern hollowpoints such as those in hornady's critical defense, how well do semi-jacketed hollowpoints fair?
 
A department head I work with has this same S&W and I loaded some rounds up for him. I used 125 grain Speer Uni-Cor hollowpoints with 2400, he said he wanted them hot so I made them hot. He didn't like them hot. They ran up into his hand so bad he couldn't finish shooting them. But the boards he was shooting at were completely trashed. HUGE gaping hole out of the back of 3 2x4's. Now he shoots a mid-load 158 Hornady XTP.
 
There is no consensuses on 125 vs 158. It seems pretty well split.

Have you tried out any potential carry loads yet?
 
yes i've tried the hornady critical defense 125 gr .357 mag. I don't have a chronograph but in comparison to some of the other .357 ammo in 158 gr, it just doesn't feel like that same .357 oomph. I have heard of the 38 spl +p but i would like to find some good carry ammo. Also I do not have a reloading set up yet but plan too.
 
Last edited:
For a short barrel revolver like that, I'd go with Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel 135g in .357mag or 125gr +P in .38spl
 
Thank you for all the responses. However, I like the idea of the 357 for the 357 and the heavier bullet. Has anyone tried the buffalo bore for short barrels?
 
Remington also makes a fine LSWCHP +p. They're soft lead, expand very well and have a long excellent track record.

Remington R38S12 158gr +P is my choice for carry in .38 snubs, based on my research and the accuracy I'm able to get with it. FWIW.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top