A
AnklePocket
Guest
Please add any that I missed. I'm in a 2nd Amendment debate on Tuesday in my public speaking class.
Anti-gunners are typically violent people at heart. This is why they fear gun ownership. They project their own fears of what they would do with a gun if they had one.
During the LA riots, the Koreans used military style semi-automatic rifles to keep the rioting, looting and murderous mobs from burning down their businesses.
An AK-47 in the hands of a law-abiding citizen is no more dangerous than any other tool.
Many are afraid of the personal responsibility that freedom requires.
10 out of 10 criminals favor gun control.
Laws that specifically target law-abiding gun owners blame and punish the wrong people.
Is a raped and strangled woman really morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun in her hand and a dead rapist at her feet?
The 2nd Amendment keeps hostile foreign forced foreign and keeps our government from becoming hostile.
Law-abiding citizens tend to remain so even after they're armed.
A government that does not trust its honest, law-abiding, tax-paying citizens with the means of self defense is itself not worthy of trust.
Just because a criminal may use a firearm has no bearing whatsoever on the right of the law-abiding citizen to keep and bear arms. Our freedom is not dependent on how others behave.
The 2nd Amendment IS homeland security.
The right to keep and bear arms is about our inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Guns contain no independent power to cause results apart from our decisions, character and purpose.
A state that deprives its law-abiding citizens with the means to defend themselves is itself a barbaric accoplice to violent crime.
Those who sacrifice freedom for the sake of security usually lose both.
Gun control is a false hope promised by an impossible utopia.
A free society, by definition, should not require its citizens to ask for permission to defend themselves.
Restricting 2nd Amendment Rights gives criminals greater predatory confidence.
Many politicians use guns as a means of scaring us into voting a certain way.
Efforts to undermine the 2nd Amendment threaten the core concept of liberty.
The armed citizen is the ultimate right of a free people.
Firearm ownership is a threat to their utopian illusion that doesn't exist.
The "civilized" elite distrusts the citizens more than they fear rapists and murderers.
The government doesn't necessarily possess moral judgement superior to that of the people.
Gun control laws ignore intent in that they are aimed at those who haven't actually done anything morally wrong. Such laws proclaim the moral content of your actions to be irrelevant. This sends a message that one's character isn't all that important, that understanding the difference between right and wrong doesn't matter and that it's more important to follow orders than to act responsibly and ethically.
We're concerned with politics over fact and logic.
Cont...
Anti-gunners are typically violent people at heart. This is why they fear gun ownership. They project their own fears of what they would do with a gun if they had one.
During the LA riots, the Koreans used military style semi-automatic rifles to keep the rioting, looting and murderous mobs from burning down their businesses.
An AK-47 in the hands of a law-abiding citizen is no more dangerous than any other tool.
Many are afraid of the personal responsibility that freedom requires.
10 out of 10 criminals favor gun control.
Laws that specifically target law-abiding gun owners blame and punish the wrong people.
Is a raped and strangled woman really morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun in her hand and a dead rapist at her feet?
The 2nd Amendment keeps hostile foreign forced foreign and keeps our government from becoming hostile.
Law-abiding citizens tend to remain so even after they're armed.
A government that does not trust its honest, law-abiding, tax-paying citizens with the means of self defense is itself not worthy of trust.
Just because a criminal may use a firearm has no bearing whatsoever on the right of the law-abiding citizen to keep and bear arms. Our freedom is not dependent on how others behave.
The 2nd Amendment IS homeland security.
The right to keep and bear arms is about our inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Guns contain no independent power to cause results apart from our decisions, character and purpose.
A state that deprives its law-abiding citizens with the means to defend themselves is itself a barbaric accoplice to violent crime.
Those who sacrifice freedom for the sake of security usually lose both.
Gun control is a false hope promised by an impossible utopia.
A free society, by definition, should not require its citizens to ask for permission to defend themselves.
Restricting 2nd Amendment Rights gives criminals greater predatory confidence.
Many politicians use guns as a means of scaring us into voting a certain way.
Efforts to undermine the 2nd Amendment threaten the core concept of liberty.
The armed citizen is the ultimate right of a free people.
Firearm ownership is a threat to their utopian illusion that doesn't exist.
The "civilized" elite distrusts the citizens more than they fear rapists and murderers.
The government doesn't necessarily possess moral judgement superior to that of the people.
Gun control laws ignore intent in that they are aimed at those who haven't actually done anything morally wrong. Such laws proclaim the moral content of your actions to be irrelevant. This sends a message that one's character isn't all that important, that understanding the difference between right and wrong doesn't matter and that it's more important to follow orders than to act responsibly and ethically.
We're concerned with politics over fact and logic.
Cont...