Proposed bills would tighten Maryland gun control measures

Status
Not open for further replies.

gun-fucious

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
1,977
Location
centre of the PA
Proposed bills would tighten Maryland gun control measures

http://www.sunspot.net/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=bal-te.md.guns07feb07

Ban on assault weapons, more ballistic fingerprints
By Ivan Penn
Sun Staff

February 7, 2003

Gun control advocates pressed yesterday for new measures that would ban assault-style weapons, expand ballistic fingerprinting and require immediate reporting of lost or stolen handguns - and their efforts picked up tentative support from Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.

With Montgomery County police Chief Charles A. Moose and the mother of slain sniper victim Conrad Johnson appearing yesterday at an Annapolis news conference in support of the bills, gun control immediately emerged as one of the prominent issues of the General Assembly session.

Ehrlich, a longtime opponent of restrictions on legally owned guns, said he would consider ballistic fingerprinting if it can be proven beneficial to law enforcement. His new state police superintendent, Col. Edward T. Norris, expressed support for another of the proposed measures.

Even so, gun enthusiasts are lining up in opposition to all of the gun control measures, criticizing them as more unnecessary regulations that will not reduce crime.

"We do indeed have a tough battle ahead of us," said Lillian Nolan, president of the Montgomery County chapter of the Million Mom March, during the news conference outside the State House, with a handful of protesters nearby. "Our opponents are actively organizing against us right now."

Moose said new laws are needed to curb gun violence in Maryland. He said the measures would help officers track weapons used in crimes while clearing the streets of high-powered guns designed primarily to hurt people.

"Gun violence continues to a problem in the state of Maryland," Moose said. "I understand these bills will not solve all law enforcement problems, ... but it will help."

During recent General Assembly sessions, gun control advocates have sought tougher laws to get weapons out of the hands of criminals. Measures enacted under the Glendening administration have given Maryland among the nation's toughest gun laws, including requirements that pistols be sold with trigger locks and that purchasers take a safety course.

While Ehrlich said he would consider the value of a ballistic fingerprinting program, he is unlikely to back measures eliminating assault-type weapons or to require mandatory reporting of missing guns because he believes they are political issues rather than a solution to gun violence.

Ehrlich favors Project Exile - a program developed in Richmond, Va., that gives mandatory prison time for gun crimes - as his crime-fighting tool.

"I want to put resources, additional dollars, into programs that work," Ehrlich said. He said he has told the state police chief to review the gun bills.

Norris said he has not seen the legislation but generally supports ballistic fingerprinting and believes that reporting of lost or stolen guns could help in crime investigations. He said he needs to review the assault weapon issue.

The bills announced yesterday would expand upon the federal law that bans some assault-type weapons to include any such gun in Maryland.

A second measure seeks to expand so-called ballistic fingerprinting or ballistic imaging to include rifles and shotguns along with handguns, for which law enforcement already conducts such tests. With ballistic imaging, the unique markings made by each gun on a bullet are recorded before a weapon is sold to help police trace a weapon used in a crime.

The third proposal would require owners to report the loss or theft of a handgun within 48 hours after it is determined to be missing.

Gun control advocates say the measures are the next steps that Maryland must take in its fight against violent crime.

Sonia Wills, mother of Conrad Johnson, the Montgomery County bus driver who was the last victim in the Washington-area sniper case, said it made her angry that she and others had to stand out in the cold to convince "elected officials that sensible regulation of firearms is a good idea."

"I am here today because I am outraged," Wills said. "Last fall, the world lost a pillar of our community, my devoted son, Conrad. Hundreds of Marylanders depended on him every day. He left behind a wife, two wonderful sons."

Though her statements moved some people in the crowd gathered on Lawyers Mall, others said that more gun regulation would not prevent the kind of tragedy that befell her son and others during the sniper killings last fall.

At times yesterday, protesters shouted at the gun control advocates and waved placards with such statements as "Lazy INS Releasing Criminals from Jail, FBI Testing will be Costly and Fail!"

Gun enthusiasts said the bills and the appearance of Moose at the news conference were part of a political ploy to restrict access to legal firearms by law-abiding citizens.

"Anti-gun proposals aimed at restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens have never had a record of decreasing crimes," said Kelly Whitley, a spokeswoman for the National Rifle Association.

Sanford Abrams, vice president of the Maryland Licensed Firearms Dealers Association Inc., said two California studies last year proved that ballistic imaging is unreliable. He pointed out that the assault-type weapon used in the sniper incidents was stolen from Washington state, and that a ban in Maryland would not have prevented those crimes.

"How would the assault weapon ban have affected a man who stole a gun 3,000 miles away? None!" Abrams said.

"None of these three measures will solve a single crime in the state of Maryland," he said. "It's just more posturing."
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A62672-2003Feb24.html
EDITORIAL:

Gov. Ehrlich on Guns
Tuesday, February 25, 2003; Page A22

DURING HIS CAMPAIGN and periodically since, Maryland Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. has talked about improving gun safety laws, but he has yet to specify which proposals he is prepared to support in the current legislative session. It's time: This month, sponsors of several sensible measures joined Montgomery County Police Chief Charles A. Moose and Sonia Wills, the mother of sniper victim Conrad Johnson, to press for legislative action. That set off the National Rifle Association's political weapons of mass obstruction in Annapolis. The governor's response has been a repeat of his noncommittal let's-see-what-works line.

The proposals would ban the possession or transfer of 45 types of assault-style weapons that are designed chiefly to kill people and that have no place in the open market; expand Maryland's ballistic fingerprinting system from handguns to all firearms; and require gun owners to report lost or stolen weapons to police within 48 hours.

The ballistic tracking system relies on the unique markings made by each gun on shell casings. A "fingerprint" taken before a gun is sold can be entered into a computerized database. Chief Moose noted that in the sniper case, authorities used ballistic fingerprinting to link all of the shootings to the same weapon. Mr. Ehrlich has said only that he would consider the value of such a program. That value depends on the data compiled; the more states that participate the better. Maryland and New York are already conducting tests on handguns. Why not add data on other weapons?

The governor's anti-crime agenda so far is limited to an adaptation of the city of Richmond's Project Exile program. It would toughen state sentencing laws for criminals caught with firearms while relying on closer cooperation with federal prosecutors. Mr. Ehrlich proposes increasing the number of crimes that carry a minimum sentence of five years in prison without the possibility of parole; any prior felony conviction would be grounds for a mandatory minimum sentence. Under Project Exile, state prosecutors defer on gun crimes to federal prosecutors, who have stiffer mandatory minimum sentences available. After the program went into effect, killings in Richmond dropped dramatically. Yet studies of this correlation have shown mixed results. One, by Jens Ludwig of Georgetown University and Steven Raphael of the University of California at Berkeley, found that crime decreased just as much in cities similar to Richmond that did not have such a program, mostly because they had experienced a rise and fall in crime coinciding with patterns in the crack cocaine trade. A spokesman for the NRA, which has supported Project Exile, dismissed the study with typical open-mindedness as "the words of a couple of stuffed shirts in some ivory tower."

Inadequate sentences do not explain the epidemic of gun violence. Far more to blame is the free flow of guns, egged on by those who argue that a heavily armed public is a strong line of defense. The key is to get a grip on gun traffic.
 
Moose said new laws are needed to curb gun violence in Maryland. He said the measures would help officers track weapons used in crimes while clearing the streets of high-powered guns designed primarily to hurt people.

How, precisely, would additional so-called "gun control" laws help? The People's Republic of Maryland already has some of the most draconian so-called "gun control" laws in the nation—and some of the highest rates of violent crime, too.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, but expecting different results.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top