Proposed Florida law: Companies can't keep employees from bringing guns to work

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,170
Location
Dallas, Texas
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/sfl-guns1002,0,4768146.story?coll=sfla-news-florida

Proposed law: Companies can't keep employees from bringing guns to work


NRA-backed bills raise freedom, safety concerns

Jason Garcia
Orlando Sentinel
Posted October 2 2005, 5:54 PM EDT


TALLAHASSEE -- Florida businesses could soon face criminal charges if they try to stop employees from bringing guns to work in their cars, thrusting the state into a growing national debate pitting individual freedom against job safety.

Backed by the National Rifle Association, two state lawmakers have filed bills that would allow workers to have guns at work, as long as the weapons remain locked in their vehicles.

The legislation is modeled after an Oklahoma law that drew national attention when a number of major companies, including energy giant ConocoPhillips and oil-services conglomerate Halliburton, sued to have it overturned.

A Florida version could have similarly sweeping effects, particularly in Central Florida, where the region's largest employer -- Walt Disney World, with more than 57,000 workers -- does not allow its employees to bring guns onto park property. Universal Orlando, which employs 13,000 people, has a similar policy.

About 353,000 people in Florida, meanwhile, have concealed-weapons permits, according to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. That figure does not include people who don't need to obtain the licenses, such as police and military personnel.

Despite the battle in Oklahoma, supporters are lining up in Tallahassee. The House bill has already attracted 10 co-sponsors.

Backers say they are confident they will get the law passed during next year's legislative session, which begins in March. The NRA is among the most powerful groups in Florida politics, wielding an active grass-roots membership and having contributed $330,000 to the Republican Party since 1996, state records show.

In the past two years, the group has won approval for measures that protect gun ranges from being forced by governments to clean up lead pollution from bullets, prevent police from creating gun databases and allow people to shoot attackers without first trying to retreat.

Marion Hammer, an NRA lobbyist, said the group will make the parking-lot bills (HB 129 and SB 206) a priority in 2006.

"For a business to tell you that in order to come onto their property, you have to give up your constitutional right is wrong," Hammer said.

Born in Oklahoma

Debate about guns in workplace parking lots erupted in 2002, when 12 workers at an Oklahoma paper mill lost their jobs after managers found guns in their vehicles parked on site, a violation of company policy.

The state's Legislature responded by passing a law giving employees the right to keep guns locked in their cars at work. Several companies filed suit in a case still winding its way through federal court.

The issue gained national attention in August, when the NRA, which says it has 4.3 million members, launched a boycott of ConocoPhillips gas stations. The group also has erected billboards that read "ConocoPhillips is No Friend of the Second Amendment."

State Rep. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, said he decided to file a Florida bill after learning of the issue through media accounts, NRA publications and conversations with Hammer.

"I thought it was a good time for Florida to go ahead and take a position," Baxley said. "What we're trying to do is avert what we see as some backdoor gun control."

Under the bills, companies that try to stop workers from bringing in their guns would be committing a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and $5,000 in fines.

Gun rights invoked

Supporters of such laws say they prevent companies from forcing workers to give up their constitutional right to carry firearms. It's important for people to have their gun close at hand, they say, citing examples where employees must walk through dark parking lots after work.

"An employer needs to recognize the right of its employees to lawfully defend themselves," said Rep. Joe Negron, R-Stuart, who is running for attorney general and has signed on as a co-sponsor to Baxley's bill.

A spokesman for Gov. Jeb Bush said the Governor's Office hasn't reviewed the proposal yet.

In an effort to blunt opposition from businesses, Baxley and Senate sponsor Durell Peaden, R-Crestview, included provisions that would shield companies from lawsuits should an employee commit a crime with the gun kept in a car on company property.


"I would think that business folks would embrace this readily because it gives them immunity from liability," Hammer said. "They should be happy as clams."

An issue of safety

But some companies say banning guns from their property isn't an issue of gun control or of liability; it's an issue of safety. They point to reports such as one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics issued earlier this year that showed shootings accounted for three-quarters of the 551 workplace homicides in the United States last year.

"If they have to get in the car and drive home to get a gun, chances are they are going to cool down a little bit," said Frank Mendizabal, a spokesman for Weyerhaeuser, which owns the Oklahoma mill that fired employees found with guns in their cars.

That the law could protect companies from lawsuits is irrelevant because immunity "doesn't prevent someone from being shot," he said.

Peter Hamm, a spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, called the proposal a "ridiculous" attempt to ignore property rights in favor of gun rights.

"Companies in America should maintain the right to be able to say, 'No guns in the workplace,' " he said.

Businesses wary

The Florida bills will likely face similar opposition from businesses.

"We would be opposed to any effort that would prevent us from determining who can or cannot bring weapons onto our property," Universal spokesman Tom Schroder said.

Bill Herrle, a vice president for the Florida Retail Federation, said the group questions whether the proposal would conflict with existing employment law and property rights.

"We are going to have some concerns with this," Herrle said, though he said the Retail Federation has yet to discuss the issue with lawmakers.

Disney spokeswoman Kim Prunty said the company has not examined the legislation. But she defended Disney's no-guns policy as "in line with our top priority, which is the safety of our cast members and guests."

Despite all its successes in recent years, Hamm predicted that the NRA has picked a fight it is unlikely to win. As strong a force as it is in Tallahassee, he said, big business is even stronger.

"They've decided to take on the only lobby in America that is arguably more powerful than them, which is the unified business lobby," Hamm said.

Jason Garcia can be reached at [email protected] or 850-222-5564.



Regards,
Rabbit.
 
I can tell you that if a company wants to can your ass, they will find an excuse.

That being said, how about we remove the restrictions about bringing guns into GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS such as court rooms and police stations? If they are going to coerce employers, why dont they start with themselves?

If the state can bring guns into my workplace, why cant I bring guns into theirs? I mean, if they havent done anythign wrong, they have nothign to worry about, right?
 
Disney spokeswoman Kim Prunty said the company has not examined the legislation. But she defended Disney's no-guns policy as "in line with our top priority, which is the safety of our cast members and guests."
And a gun locked in the trunk of a car out in the parking lot reduces that safety exactly how?

It can't be the disgruntled employee shtick. I haven't read of a case yet where a disgruntled employee already had a gun at work, hauled it out, and started blasting away. My impression is that they either bring the gun with them in the morning, after spending a night nursing their particular grudges and communing with their particular demons -- or they get fired or disciplined and go home, load up, and return to take revenge for slights real or imagined. Not allowing guns in locked cars isn't going to reduce this type of incident one iota.
 
Hope it passes and im sorry but screw the company my safety is more important than them getting Sued ..

Besides if more workers were armed i would be willing to bet shootings in the work place will go down ... most of these shooters are cowards and give up if it looks like they will get shot
 
Florida is a Right To Work state.
That being said, all RTW state means is that you can't be fired for not joining or for resigning from a union. Nothing more.
 
I was talking about the more expansive concept of whether or not employers can fire your ass for flimsy reasons.

I would be much happier if CCW was allowed in government buildings. I can negotiate with my employers without govt help thanks very much.
 
Likewise. I know plenty of IT contractors where I work who have been called before they leave the house to head to work telling them they are no longer needed. Reason Shmeason.

Makes you wonder how much your time is worth to their money.

More importantly, how much is your life and safety worth to their liability? My group just moved to a warehouse district in a hideous part of town. I saw on the news last night where there have been a lot of parking lot break-ins in the area. The contract security desk jockeys tend to clock out at 1700. I guess the cameras on the light poles are all we need after hours.

Regards,
Rabbit.
 
I was talking about the more expansive concept of whether or not employers can fire your ass for flimsy reasons.
In Fla they can fire you if they don't like the shoes you wear.

This law would essentially take the liability away from the company.
Insurance companies can't gig them on it and they can't be held responsible for anything that comes from employees having guns in their cars parked on company property.

looks like they would gladly accept the new law
 
I would love to see these same liberals who are now screaming about private property and company rights be ask if they feel it would be ok for companies to oh, lets say not hire blacks, women, gays, people who do not drink Mt. Dew, irish ect... or just not serve those people, maybe make them set in the back of the bus or drink from differnt water fountains or soda machines. Then see if they think private property and company rights still trump the Constitution.
 
Originally posted by Beerslurpy:
That being said, how about we remove the restrictions about bringing guns into GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS such as court rooms and police stations? If they are going to coerce employers, why dont they start with themselves?

If the state can bring guns into my workplace, why cant I bring guns into theirs? I mean, if they havent done anythign wrong, they have nothign to worry about, right?

Beerslurpy,
Utah did exactly that. The legislature passed a law allowing government employees not only to bring their guns to work in their cars, but to carry them during their work duties. Any public property is fair game. I have carried my gun into the state capitol and numerous public buildings. The exception to this is that there are no guns in the courtroom.
 
Umm, Hey, Guys!

"Right to Work" is not exactly the same as "Employment at Will." You can have one, without the other.

That said, I think that this would be a good law. It would not create any new privileges, just shut down usurpation of natural rights by employers taking advantage of their economic "gotcha" position over their employees, as advised by their lawyers.
 
Just to put my .02 on this. It isn't about CCW AT WORK! Or even CCW ON PUBLIC PROPERTY !!!! This is to stop the "Backdoor" "NO CCW"... As in.. You may NOT strap your personal defence weapon on, and drive to work, because when you arrive, you may not possess a firearm on company property (even locked in the trunk of your car.) By the current rules, you may NOT have a weapon to defend yourself on either the ride TO, ( and by exlcusion) FROM work, if your workplace does not allow firearms on the property.

To put it simply, if I start work at 3:00PM, but leave the house at 1:00pm (with no intent of returning to my house) to do some errands, and then meet my wife after work (without returning home) for dinner/shopping and return home at 1:00am, for those 12 hrs I cannot be armed, even with a CCW. :fire:
 
I Wonder...

How much of this "can't have a gun" policy is guilty conscience on the part of the employers (If the help knew what I was really up to, they might shoot me) and how much is boilerplate legal language which all employers buy with the "employee handbook" package?
 
Florida - Guns at Work

This would be a feather in our cap!


Jason Garcia
Tallahassee Bureau

October 2, 2005

TALLAHASSEE -- Florida businesses could soon face criminal charges if they try to stop employees from bringing guns to work in their cars, thrusting the state into a growing national debate pitting individual freedom against job safety.

Backed by the National Rifle Association, two state lawmakers have filed bills that would allow workers to have guns at work, as long as the weapons remain locked in their vehicles.

The legislation is modeled after an Oklahoma law that drew national attention when a number of major companies, including energy giant ConocoPhillips and oil-services conglomerate Halliburton, sued to have it overturned.

A Florida version could have similarly sweeping effects, particularly in Central Florida, where the region's largest employer -- Walt Disney World, with more than 57,000 workers -- does not allow its employees to bring guns onto park property. Universal Orlando, which employs 13,000 people, has a similar policy.

About 353,000 people in Florida, meanwhile, have concealed-weapons permits, according to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. That figure does not include people who don't need to obtain the licenses, such as police and military personnel.

Despite the battle in Oklahoma, supporters are lining up in Tallahassee. The House bill has already attracted 10 co-sponsors.

Backers say they are confident they will get the law passed during next year's legislative session, which begins in March. The NRA is among the most powerful groups in Florida politics, wielding an active grass-roots membership and having contributed $330,000 to the Republican Party since 1996, state records show.

In the past two years, the group has won approval for measures that protect gun ranges from being forced by governments to clean up lead pollution from bullets, prevent police from creating gun databases and allow people to shoot attackers without first trying to retreat.

Marion Hammer, an NRA lobbyist, said the group will make the parking-lot bills (HB 129 and SB 206) a priority in 2006.

"For a business to tell you that in order to come onto their property, you have to give up your constitutional right is wrong," Hammer said.

Born in Oklahoma

Debate about guns in workplace parking lots erupted in 2002, when 12 workers at an Oklahoma paper mill lost their jobs after managers found guns in their vehicles parked on site, a violation of company policy.

The state's Legislature responded by passing a law giving employees the right to keep guns locked in their cars at work. Several companies filed suit in a case still winding its way through federal court.

The issue gained national attention in August, when the NRA, which says it has 4.3 million members, launched a boycott of ConocoPhillips gas stations. The group also has erected billboards that read "ConocoPhillips is No Friend of the Second Amendment."

State Rep. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, said he decided to file a Florida bill after learning of the issue through media accounts, NRA publications and conversations with Hammer.

"I thought it was a good time for Florida to go ahead and take a position," Baxley said. "What we're trying to do is avert what we see as some backdoor gun control."

Under the bills, companies that try to stop workers from bringing in their guns would be committing a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and $5,000 in fines.

Gun rights invoked

Supporters of such laws say they prevent companies from forcing workers to give up their constitutional right to carry firearms. It's important for people to have their gun close at hand, they say, citing examples where employees must walk through dark parking lots after work.

"An employer needs to recognize the right of its employees to lawfully defend themselves," said Rep. Joe Negron, R-Stuart, who is running for attorney general and has signed on as a co-sponsor to Baxley's bill.

A spokesman for Gov. Jeb Bush said the Governor's Office hasn't reviewed the proposal yet.

In an effort to blunt opposition from businesses, Baxley and Senate sponsor Durell Peaden, R-Crestview, included provisions that would shield companies from lawsuits should an employee commit a crime with the gun kept in a car on company property.

"I would think that business folks would embrace this readily because it gives them immunity from liability," Hammer said. "They should be happy as clams."

An issue of safety

But some companies say banning guns from their property isn't an issue of gun control or of liability; it's an issue of safety. They point to reports such as one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics issued earlier this year that showed shootings accounted for three-quarters of the 551 workplace homicides in the United States last year.

"If they have to get in the car and drive home to get a gun, chances are they are going to cool down a little bit," said Frank Mendizabal, a spokesman for Weyerhaeuser, which owns the Oklahoma mill that fired employees found with guns in their cars.

That the law could protect companies from lawsuits is irrelevant because immunity "doesn't prevent someone from being shot," he said.

Peter Hamm, a spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, called the proposal a "ridiculous" attempt to ignore property rights in favor of gun rights.

"Companies in America should maintain the right to be able to say, 'No guns in the workplace,' " he said.

Businesses wary

The Florida bills will likely face similar opposition from businesses.

"We would be opposed to any effort that would prevent us from determining who can or cannot bring weapons onto our property," Universal spokesman Tom Schroder said.

Bill Herrle, a vice president for the Florida Retail Federation, said the group questions whether the proposal would conflict with existing employment law and property rights.

"We are going to have some concerns with this," Herrle said, though he said the Retail Federation has yet to discuss the issue with lawmakers.

Disney spokeswoman Kim Prunty said the company has not examined the legislation. But she defended Disney's no-guns policy as "in line with our top priority, which is the safety of our cast members and guests."

Despite all its successes in recent years, Hamm predicted that the NRA has picked a fight it is unlikely to win. As strong a force as it is in Tallahassee, he said, big business is even stronger.

"They've decided to take on the only lobby in America that is arguably more powerful than them, which is the unified business lobby," Hamm said
 
While they're at it..................

they should be able to ban Catholics, Jews, people w/ red hair, gays, anyone with a health concern and people with names that start with the letter "S". :banghead:

A polyester clothing ban is useful but now I know we've gone too far............................

Alex - what other rights do you wish to "check at the door"?
 
Forcing employers is stupid unless we start with the government, biggest employer of them all. Government buildings are still off limits to CCW in FL and we need to fix that first.
 
beer, the government is next!

We have been far too hesitant to use the force of law to protect our civil rights. The only thing people understand is raw force. Let's use the force of government for us.

We need to get started on the schools. That's where the future will be won. Mandatory firearms education, school shooting ranges, qualification with M16 mandatory for graduation, etc.
 
If this bill is like Oklahoma, the bill only always you to lock the gun in your car in a company parking lot. At least at govenment building you can at least lock your gun in your car.

This bill allows you to protect yourself driving to and from work, and as it's written the employeer is to protect you while you are at work.
 
El Tejon said:
We need to get started on the schools. That's where the future will be won. Mandatory firearms education, school shooting ranges, qualification with M16 mandatory for graduation, etc.
An interesting concept, and one that has sidled through my brain periodically. But I always wondered how to even try getting it started.

As I read this thread, the shoehorn for the foot in the door occurred to me: Our public schools like to claim that they prepare our youth to be good citizens, right? (At least, they claimed this when I was in high school ... I actually have no idea what they claim to accomplish today, but teaching people how to write certainly isn't on the list.) So, to be a good citizen I would assume one muct receive at least rudimentary training in the skills required of citizens. For example, I can remember during election years being taken to a polling place and shown how (physically) to vote.

So ==>> although most people don't know it (present company excluded, of course), the Federal militia act automatically makes all males between the ages of 18 and 45 members of the unorganized militia. What if a group with some credibility (not just a bunch of gun nuts like the NRA and/or GOA) were to advance the rather radical notion that if one is a member of the militia, one bloody well ought to be instructed in the use of the primary tools of the militiaman -- bring on the M16s.

Of course, the oppostion then might counter by simply trying to repeal the Militia Act, or to twist things around to make the "militia" into a bunch of unarmed traffic cops for evacuation routes.

Worth considering?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top