Pros & Con of SA revovler vs DA or Semi Auto for Conceal Carry

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mike Sr.

Member
Joined
May 23, 2005
Messages
443
Location
mid-West
I am quite good shooting a single action 357 mag with full power loads; at one time I could cut a cornstalk in-half at 20 yards. I now have a CCW permit (first time I've carried a firearm in case of harm, since 1966) and I'm torn between which system to carry: Single action 357,
Double action 357 or 44 mag( mild cast loads about 1100fps) and semi auto: .40 or 45.

I am a firm believer 1st shot counts!

I understand importance of the load carried.

Any information will help...

Thanks...Mike Sr.
 
SAA

Tough decision, I open carry a revolver here in Az, quite a lot, also carry concealed but a smaller .38.
My alltime fav is anything in the 1911 platform.
I appear to very proficient in shooting it as well.
On any given day I also have a kel tec 380 in a pocket holster,
My rule of thumb is carry what works, hide the best ya can and deal with someone noticing it.
If you settle for something you aren't comfortable or shoot well, might as well have brought a high dollar club, it'll serve you better.
good luck with the choice, much like buying shoes, won't know if they're keepers till you walked a bit in them.
rj
 
Capacity and reload time are big factors. However with a single action army, you dont have to worry about having a magazine get released by accident, or spend 20 minutes trying to figure out why the magazine in your 1911 wont slide into the magazine well under duress.

If you can shoot it real well, stick with it untill you get confident in your shooting abilities with an easily concealed 5-6 shot semi auto pocket pistol.
 
The single action I would carry is a Ruger, stainless blackhawk, 4,5/8"...and I love shooting it.
 
Disadvantages of a SAA Clone or revolver:

Difficult to conceal
Difficult to reload
Capacity.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I would also consider speed an issue. Plus having to cock the gun to ready it and lower the hammer if you choose not to shoot are just more steps during which something can go wrong. I'd choose any modern DA revolver or semi-auto over a SA only revolver.

I would also reconsider handloads for self-defense carry. Find out what your local PD or SO carry in their weapons and use the same in yours, in the appropriate caliber, of course.
 
A single action revolver is great fun at the range but I can't see any advantage over a double action revolver. If you want, you can always use a DA in single action anyway.
 
Main thing is to conceal carry whatever you're comfortable with. If you're good with the single action and can get off quick, accurate shots - then go for it.

I conceal carry a Smith & Wesson 642 Airweight loaded with .38sp +p. It is double action only (does not have a hammer). People tell me that in a "situation", the less "motor skills" that have to be used, the better. I know that I'd do much worse defending myself with anything single action. But thats me.

I also enjoy firing .357mag out of my Smith & Wesson 686 PLUS. I can make very accurate shots thanks to the 4" barrel - much more accurate than I can do shooting .38sp out of the Airweight snub. But the 686P revolver weighs 40oz when empty. Versus about 15oz for the Airweight. Even though I shoot better with the 686P, I choose the Airweight for CCW. CCW with the 686P is "legal" but pretty darn uncomfortable.
 
A single action revolver is great fun at the range but I can't see any advantage over a double action revolver. If you want, you can always use a DA in single action anyway.
Click to expand...

A number of folks find SA revolvers, particularly the 1873 Single Action Army and it's clones, to be at or near the top in the "pointability" category. And I agree. And since the first shot counts more than any other, I can certainly see why some carry a SAA, as it probably works best for them. I don't own any SAAs currently, but will one day. Something about them, they just seem to gravitate towards whatever object you want to put a round into, more so than any other handgun I've shot. And with practice, they can be mighty fast to get off that all important first shot.

Even if I had one, I'm not currently familiar enough with one to really on it for SD. But if I were, I'd OC it (legal in NC) and pocket carry my S&W 642 for a NY reload. But, with a good holster and belt, I'd imagine a SAA with no more than a 5.5" barrel wouldn't be too hard to conceal.
 
Double action revolvers are versatile, reliable and come in a myriad of different shapes, sizes and materials. There is bound to be a perfect CC choice for you out there in DA.
 
Not my choice, but the single action will do the job... if you do.
There was a deputy here who carried a nickel SAA .44 Special. Nobody messed with him.

I think I'd want a .44 or .45; the .357 SAA is heavy due to the smaller holes in barrel and cylinder. But if you already have the .357, carry it and see how it feels on a daily basis. Are you comfortable, are you confident?
 
Birdshead Vaquero with the short barrel carries just fine with a good belt and holster.

I am confident in the gun and my ability to use it.
 
I carried a 45 lc Bisley Vaquero for quite a while.
I now carry a DA 357 mainly because I sold my Vaquero when I got into IDPA (and still regret it) and bought into brass pukers.

There are some good arguments here against the SA wheelgun, like reload time, etc.

However, I'd say that what is most important is that you are comfortable with it. Sounds like you are.

I'd carry it.
 
I always learned it as:

Accuracy
Speed
Power

Accuracy: If you can't get hits it doesn't matter how fast you shoot or what you are shooting.
Speed: Given two opponents that are equal in accuracy, the one that gets a hit first is probably going to win the fight.
Power: Bring the biggest gun you can 1) carry 2) get hits with 3) does the most damage. The .25ACP in your pocket is better than the .44Mag in your safe.

As far as SA revolvers go, I couldn't see carrying one for potential social work. Do you practice drawing and firing one-handed? Your off hand may be busy when you need that pistol. How fast is your reload time compared to a DA revolver or semi-auto? The old FBI stat says that mot fights last for 7 rounds, how long does it take you to get to round #7?

I carry semi-autos. The big one (Walther P99) is what I shoot in local matches and am very comfortable with, the small one (Kahr PM9) is what I carry when I don't feel like carrying a gun.

BSW
 
Except for slower reload I don't see any reason. Worked for most of a hundred years . With out any body having a problem with it. I guess today were to busy peeing out pants and loosing contol to cock a pistol and pull the trigger under stress . Really are we wimps today need pistol to do it all for us.
If you feel comfortable then do it. Bet in a year be packing a smaller lighter pistol.
 
Worked for most of a hundred years . With out any body having a problem with it.
Click to expand...
Not quite. It was the Army standard issue for 19 years. While the replacement wasn't a great gun, the Army never stopped looking for something better -- and found it in the M1911.

As for other uses, what police department still issued SAAs a hundred years (1973) later?
 
I'm torn between which system to carry: Single action 357, Double action 357 or 44 mag( mild cast loads about 1100fps) and semi auto: .40 or 45.
Click to expand...

A double action .357 in a medium frame size is about ideal as a CCW piece. My own is a Speed Six. The K frame magnums are also good. The semis are fine but it's ultimately a matter of what you shoot best. Notice I say shoot best, not conceal easiest. Find the concealable weapon that works best for you, then find the rig that will conceal it. Don't go the other way around and end up with some 12 oz. magnum! The purpose is not to carry it, but to use it to defend your life in gravest extremes.
 
The biggest pro of the SA sixgun is its superb pointability for many folks. The biggest con is the high amount of manipulation needed to keep it in action. The SA is NOT slow, in skilled hands, until it runs empty, at which point it takes more time to get it back into action. Most armed encounters are finished with the ammo that is inside the weapon; you run out of time before you run out of ammo. It is the anomalous longer engagements that require reloading.

Please keep in mind that the fourth sentence in the above paragraph does not necessarily support a low-capacity weapon.

As I just related in a longer version in the revolver forum of THR, the one time I thought I was going to have to use an SA sixgun to defend against two bad guys, the low capacity did not trouble my mind at the moment.

As for concealment, I find an SAA to ride quite comfortably, which involves more than just size. An SAA is balanced on the belt, and does not poke or prod me where some smaller weapons will. (Rear corners of some autoloader slides are particularly annoying to me.) I do not routinely carry an SA sixgun, as I also carry a badge, and my chief wants me armed with either an autoloader or a DA revolver. I can foresee carrying carrying an SAA some of the time after I retire, but then, as now, I will almost certainly also have a second, smaller weapon on me, too.
 
I wasn't talking about just the Military . Civilians own pistols also . Colt Paterson #1 pocket model Made 1837 Walker model 44 cal. 1847. Like I said around a 100 years.
I was addressing SA pistols of all types . Cap and ball has laid many a man in the ground.
 
Should you ever need more than 5-6 rounds, a SAA is hopeless. Gateloading is not a realistic tactical option.

Anyone seriously discussing this has not tried to reload a SAA under stress. It is SLOWER than SLOW.
 
Should you ever need more than 5-6 rounds, a SAA is hopeless. Gateloading is not a realistic tactical option.
Click to expand...

Some years back, after a grass fire, there was a serious search for artifacts at the Little Bighorn Battlefield. A great many cartridge cases were found and forensically examined -- so investigators were able to say, "X number of .44 Henry cases were found, from Y number of rifles."

One thing that "surprised" the investigators was that "so few .45 Colt cases were found."

Well, duh!

When a cavalryman was reduced to fighting with his revolver, and fired his last shot, he did't live to eject many fired cases!!
 
Seems to me that the question is,

Which would you bring into action faster, the SA revolver that you've used until its as familiar as breathing or the semi-auto you have to think about?

I'm inclined to think that while it would be a mistake for a person with little shooting experience to set out to get an SA revolver for his carry it might be an equal mistake to part a person from the gun they have practiced with until everything about using it was instinctual no matter what type/caliber that gun was.

But, might there be a SA/DA revolver out there with the same ergonomics as your favorite that you could cock as you are accustomed to as a routine practice but which would offer the option of firing without cocking if you didn't have that extra split-second to cock your SA?
 
If that's all you have...then sure. If you have a small gun available, carry that too...New York reload and all that.

But there are better choices available. The double action revolver can be fired and reloaded faster. A semi-auto is even easier to reload and has higher capacity. I know the national average for rounds fired in a self-defense event is low, but that's an average. Your encounter may be on the extreme end...10 thugs, lots of weapons, lots of shots...or not.

Prepare for the 90%...get "good enough" and carry good enough equipment. As much as I'd like to carry an M4 to work, it's just not feasible.
 
Some folks have pointed out how well these guns point and shoot for some people. That isn't the case for me. I can shoot just about any other revolver or auto much more accurate than I can the SAA. I own a Ruger BH .357 and I find the SAA's grip to be too small for my hands. I find that if I take the time, I can be very accurate with it, but for the most part I feel that there are newer, better designs out there.

I am not slamming the design, I mean Colt had to be doing something right to basically still be producing the same design on the same tools for the last 100 plus years, I just think that it's a design that doesn't work for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

G
  • Locked
  • Poll
Looking for a new CCW
Replies
21
Views
938
zeroskillz
Z
P
  • Locked
What to carry?
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
Vern Humphrey
V
1
  • Locked
Rimfire: Bolt vs Semi-Auto... pros/cons?
Replies
15
Views
2K
DrDremel
D
C
  • Locked
  • Poll
Concealed Carry. Para Hawg 9 vs Taurus 617
Replies
4
Views
982
Taurus 617 CCW
T
S
  • Locked
Pocketable/extreme concealed carry....small 9mm vs. snubnose 357..
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
george29
george29
Back
Top