Question about ATF ruling 2011-4

Status
Not open for further replies.
No! You just need a President to give them better marching orders, to appoint a Director who reads the Constitution more carefully, and (to be honest) repeal of some of the dumb-as-a-box-of-hair federal laws they have to try to enforce.
 
not everyone at the ATF are "bad guys".
Sorry for being off topic, but I just thought it was worth mentioning your statement is very true. I guess it’s similar to reviews on customer service, you typically only hear about the bad guys… I know a guy that has served and continues to serve his country here and abroad and also carries an AFT badge. He doesn’t make the rules and he’s treated me well, so I separate him from the political class at the upper end of Justice/BATFE.
 
As I understand it, lower receivers are bought on the 4473 as not as a "long gun" but as an "Other" category subject to the 21-year age limit same as handgun or a PGO shotgun.

Converting a Title I long gun to a handgun is a no-no, because it becomes a Title II SBR or SBS, requiring an approved Form 1. The intent of Congress being to prevent evasion of handgun regulation by sawing off less regulated rifles or shotguns to make concealable weapons.

However, it has been OK to convert a handgun to a long gun by replacing the barrel with a 16" rifle or 18" shotgun barrel and adding a shoulder stock.

Since a firearm legally bought and owned as a handgun is not an attempt to evade handgun regulations, converting it from rifle configuration back to a handgun should not be counted as a violation. Letter 2011-4 signed 25 Jun by ATF Acting Director Kenneth E. Melton 25 Jul 2011 appears to support that.

What would be violations (without a Form I) are:
A. pistol version with shoulder stock and short barrel attached, or with shoulder stock available w/o long barrel or
B. rifle with short barrel attached, or with short barrel available w/o pistol grip.

What is interesting is the idea that since a lower is sold as "Other" firearm, the lower could be configured as a rifle or pistol, and switched, as long as a Title I rifle or pistol is created, and not a Title II stocked pistol or short barrel rifle. I want to see how this plays out over time.
 
Since these have never hit a 4473, do you recommend I bounce them through a local FFL to classify them as "Other" on paper somewhere, before proceeding?
 
Nope. I don't think there'd be any benefit to that, nor detriment in NOT doing it.

(IMHO, as they say.) All an FFL taking them in would be saying is "at this one point in time these were bare receivers." Heck, you've got pictures that prove as much.
 
Not only that, but I have an IL State trooper who can confirm they were bare receivers. (They bought a bunch of them off me, and have been to my house, and seen "my gun cave")
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top