Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Question about the shapes of lead in pistols vs rifles

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by JTH, Dec 30, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JTH

    JTH Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    378
    Quick and simple question, why aren't pistol round lead pointed? Seems it would be more aerodynamic or does it have to with the smaller load and rounded shape lead will do more damage to target, especially people targets!
     
  2. Mr_Pale_Horse

    Mr_Pale_Horse Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    751
    Location:
    IndianaKy
    Most pistol rounds are, or very soon will be after firing, subsonic. Moreover, the larger frontal area is more disruptive to tissue, and less reliant on expansion, which happens less reliably at lower velocities.
     
  3. Deus Machina

    Deus Machina Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,206
    Location:
    Brandon, Florida
    Just nature of the beast.

    A relatively ball-shaped nose feeds better in most pistol designs.
    At their velocity, a large frontal area causes a larger wound.
    Most importantly, a bullet of the same length with a pointier nose weighs less. Any aerodynamic advantage is instantly overcome by the loss of mass.
     
  4. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,337
    A pointed bullet would take up more room in revolver cylinder or pistol magazine, leaving less space for powder or making the gun big and unwieldy. Pistol ranges are usually short enough not to benefit from the aerodynamics of a spitzer bullet anyhow.
     
  5. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    That pretty much sums it up.

    :)
     
  6. JTH

    JTH Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    378
    Thanks guys. Covered my question and then some. I've learn alot since joining THR. I'm within 5 years of considering retirement, since moving back to a metro area (Austin), I can think of 10 to 1 reasons for moving back to a rural area in NE Tx around Lake Fork, where I lived for a couple of years, while teaching at a high school in the area. If the SHTF, I have fishing, deer, hogs an water to live on. It sure would be a beech trying to live w/o a/c in the summer though. Always can look into a small wind turbine or solar panels but would not be cheap.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page