In the program QuickLoad, the software makes no distinction between rifles, semi-auto pistols, and revolvers. As such, it handles barrel length the same for all three - the length is the distance from the breech face to the muzzle.
However, I have a Taurus 450-SS-UL with a "2 inch barrel" according to Taurus that really measures 3.81 inches from the muzzle to the breech face. The length of the barrel (back of forcing cone to the muzzle) measures 2.16 inches. Is it the norm for manufacturers to report revolver barrel length differently from the standard used on rifles and shotguns? When using QuickLoad, I should enter my barrel length as 3.81 inches, right?
Lastly, the final 0.665 inches of the barrel is ported with six holes measuring 0.135 inches in diameter. For when the end of a barrel is ported, especially in a barrel that's short to begin with, is there a "rule of thumb" for how much velocity loss you realize? Of course I could chronograph a load and compare it to the QuickLoad prediction to find out, but somebody HAS to have dealt with this already, right?
However, I have a Taurus 450-SS-UL with a "2 inch barrel" according to Taurus that really measures 3.81 inches from the muzzle to the breech face. The length of the barrel (back of forcing cone to the muzzle) measures 2.16 inches. Is it the norm for manufacturers to report revolver barrel length differently from the standard used on rifles and shotguns? When using QuickLoad, I should enter my barrel length as 3.81 inches, right?
Lastly, the final 0.665 inches of the barrel is ported with six holes measuring 0.135 inches in diameter. For when the end of a barrel is ported, especially in a barrel that's short to begin with, is there a "rule of thumb" for how much velocity loss you realize? Of course I could chronograph a load and compare it to the QuickLoad prediction to find out, but somebody HAS to have dealt with this already, right?