Range Report #2: Taurus 650 CIA snub .357: Simple Pleasures

Status
Not open for further replies.

orangeninja

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
3,117
The saga continues:

Today was another fine beautiful day at the range to punch holes in paper bad guys. After shooting about 100 rounds of full house .357 Magnum loads my last trip to the range, I shot some .38 Special out of it today, here are my observations.

1.) Fit, finish, trigger, ergonomics

This is a stock Taurus 650 .357 Magnum CIA, no frills, no muss. The bluing is on par with what you would expect from a Taurus, no gaps, fairly even bluing, all business. I’m not running to momma to show it off, but neither is it anything to be ashamed of. The trigger has a slight stack and then suddenly lets off, I really like that. It is not exactly easy to pull or stage (which a revolver shouldn’t be) and the trigger is smooth and what I would call quick, (for a revolver) since I pretty much do not anticipate when it will fire. This prevents me from flinching and helps with solid follow through on the trigger pull, I commit, then pull just like you should with a wheel gun.

The grips (stock Taurus rubber boot grips) were misaligned when I first got the gun, I took them off and took a very, very fine edged knife and trimmed them down evenly. I left a little roughing in the front which helps with holding on to the gun when dealing with the full house magnums. The grips were my only complaint, but after shaving them down and shooting it today, I’ve decided to stick with the factory grips for now.

The cylinder was as tight as a snare drum skin when I first got it, it wouldn’t budge in either direction. Since shooting the magnums it has the slightest bit of play, but not excessive, which is to be expected once a gun starts to get broken in a bit.

The empties eject promptly when striking the ejector rod smartly. I didn’t get any excessive hang-ups or shells sticking, not even when the gun got very hot, but since this is a J-frame gun, you do have to hit the rod smartly.

The front sight is a blued ramp style. I’ve decided after a little contemplation that I will paint it orange since I do have a bit of trouble seeing the front sight in low light and it’s nearly impossible to see in the dark. I will post a further report on that later.

Other than the above mentioned issues, this revolver is nearly perfect in every way for it’s intended purpose. Is it as slick as a Colt Dick Special or a Smith? It may rival the Smith (depending on year made) but it still doesn’t touch a Colt, but then a Dick Special isn’t something I would carry for personal defense. After all, if I had to use it and it was stuck in an evidence room somewhere for 2 years uncleaned with a case number engraved on it, I’d probably be sick. As for a Taurus, I’d just buy two for the price of a Colt.

Final word on fit and finish: Best buy, good workmanship and features and the best value for the dollar. It’s like a S&W but with an instant $200.00 rebate.

2.) Shooting

As before the trigger is surprisingly well done for a gun costing a little under $300.00. I have compared it with a Smith&Wesson and found the triggers to be very similar to one another. Personally I wasn’t blown away by either, but both were very manageable borderline good. I imagine if one were to polish up the trigger a bit, either gun would be slick as snot. I prefer the trigger stock with a little resistance.

Disclaimer: I am not a revolver shooter. I have owned just a handful of revolvers in my whole life and am not what you would call an aficionado of fine wheel guns. I like autos, will always carry an auto (except when described below) but the revolver fills a niche that no other gun will fill in my humble opinion. Thus my skills with a revolver are workmanlike and unpolished, I’m no Keith Elmer.

Shooting the .357 Magnums was at the high end of my tolerance level, border line painful which became painful after about 50 rounds. I believe that it is about like catching a line drive in little league, doable, but after about 50, it begins to get really old. The gun weighs 24 ounces and before shooting the magnums, I was contemplating trading “up” on an alloy framed .357 Ultralite, but after shooting it, I was thankful for every God given ounce of steel on that weapon. I do not advise going lighter for full house loads, head my advice and thank me later.

Upon shooting some WWB .38 specials the gun felt like a pussy cat. It just loved those rounds and I was grateful to feed it all it wanted. I was still ready to shoot after 100 rounds with no pain in my wrist or hand. I would say that it handles the target load .38 specials about like a Glock 17 handles 9mm, very similar recoil there. It wasn’t snappy; it wasn’t harsh or mean, it was smooth and graceful. Within short order I was making 30 foot headshots on a standard sized silhouette without a whole lot of time being used. I feel other people could do better with the gun than I could, but for a pocket pistol, I am elated about 30 foot head shots. How many head shots, you ask? 75 and I only dropped three of them off the head high and right, which were completely my fault because I started getting cocky and would fire off 5 relatively quick shots, about 1 a second.

Upon shooting strong hand only, I was able to make solid hits on the BODY of the silhouette as quickly as I could pull the trigger. We’re not talking surgical here, just center mass (ish) hits.

Upon shooting weak hand only (you do practice this right?) I was able to get center mass hits at about 1 shot per second, again, these were minute of torso and not “pie-plate” groups. At 30 feet this is acceptable as all shots were within the 5 ring of the silhouette using either hand. No misses. (Note: standard B27 Silhouette targets are 50 yard targets that score the “X”, 9 and 8 ring as a 5, the 7 ring as a 4 and everything else as a 3, this is a standard law enforcement target, at least as used by my agency.)

Final word on shooting: The gun shoots much better than you would think. I’m so happy with it; I think I’ll get a second one in stainless. This gets a “Best Buy” rating from me and I only have given that rating to about 6 other guns. If you are debating a snub, debate no more. When compared with a Taurus 605, this one is a bit slicker on the trigger and is easier to pocket carry. My preference is for the 650 by about a yard.

Continues....
 
...Continued from above....


3.) Carry

I bought a snub for 3 very good reasons. First, it makes a great pocket pistol for when running to the corner store and I don’t want to “gear up” with all my crap. Secondly, I will carry it as a BUG (backup gun) for those times that duty would necessitate that as prudent action or when traveling to areas of town where everyone should be issued at least a 12gauge, which every city has that area. Thirdly, it doesn’t jam; getting one of these to malfunction would take major abuse or a manufacturer error. If I ever have to access the BUG feature of this, it is very likely I will have limited strength from fatigue or injury, possibly may only have the use of one hand, not necessarily my strong hand and I may limp wrist the crap out of the gun because of all this; or I may have to jam it firmly into some scumbags ribs as hard as I can and pull the trigger multiple times while he is on top of me. A BUG should be unbreakable, it’s your LAST CHANCE TO SURVIVE, and though I like my Glock 26 a lot, it won’t do all that.

As for pocket carry, it fits in my duty trousers or pants front weak or strong side pocket. I could be standing in line for food or talking to you face to face with my hand on my gun ready to go and nobody is the wiser. It’s instant, it’s fast, it’s entirely practical, but it’ll never make the cover of a S.W.A.T. Magazine with a sexy flashlight next to it, but as the French say, “who gives a rip”.

The gun weighs 24 ounces, which is about equivalent to a fully loaded Glock 26 subcompact 9mm. They are almost identical in this respect, it carries IWB very well, and is not intrusive on my (not so thin) waistline, but I prefer pocket carry for the above reasons.

My last reason for getting a snub to carry as a BUG and corner store gun? If I only get 5 rounds between me and the Almighty, make them .357 Magnum 125 gr. Gold Dot or Golden Saber, nobody can argue with their track record in the field and I will likely be shooting at the “officer fatality range” of less than 10 feet. We’re talking bad breath range where skills and accuracy won’t save you, alertness and speed will.

My final word on carry: One of the easiest guns on earth to carry. Any smaller or lighter, it wouldn’t be capable of what I want it to do. It carries like a big mouse gun, but shoots like a field artillery piece. I think I’ll name it “the Noisy Cricket” after Will Smith’s famous pocket piece in Men in Black. I cannot recommend this gun enough.

Cheers, Alduro
;)
 
My same feelings towards it's shrouded brother the 651. However, since putting the rosewood boots (from Taurus'es website) I have had to back down to hot .38 +P. Those rubber grips with the covered backstrap make all the difference when shooting .357, but I like the smooth wood for pocket carry.

I might add that the wood grips required some filing and carving on the top left panel to allow use of a speedloader.

Excellent review. The 651 is my main carry piece, although I have bigger and better. With 1000 dry fires a night for 2 months, my trigger is like butter and my trigger fingers look like they are on 'roids.
 
I may have to dryfire mine a bit then.

Did you use snap caps or the orange cylinder cover that came with the gun?
 
Great review and write up......it sounds as if one can't go wrong with a one of these little Tauri. I have two small Taurus revolvers : a blued 3" barrel M85 and a SS 2" Ultra-lite" M85......both fine revolvers. The "instant rebate" you mention is certainly a plus !

-Regards
 
alduro said:
Did you use snap caps or the orange cylinder cover that came with the gun?
My orange cylander thingy lasted ~100 rounds, then busted. I got some snap caps and did a "poor man's trigger job." Not as extensive as HiWayMan, though, as I think I stopped after a week. It did smooth out considerably.

The snap caps are also a useful training tool. They help with gun handling/re/unloading and to answer questions like, "How many rounds from a Bianchi speed strip can I strip off at one time?" and "Do I look like I have a huge sebacious cyst on my thigh if I stuff a charged speedloader in my pocket?"

I own the 651 (shrouded) in "total titanium." It tips the scales at 17 oz. I knew from experience that I could handle an all-steel .357mag snubby (buddy has a SW640). The 651 Ti is a bit more brisk. I did a mini-review in early 2005. Recoil is more manageable with heavier (180gr) HP fodder, IMO. Not near the muzzle blast of 125s or even 158s.

I went Ti for several reasons, one of them being that I like to run/walk/ruckmarch outside. The Ti Taurus helps with the copious "guy over 200lbs" sweat I produce when exercising.

It has almost completely replaced my Kel-tec P32 in my carry regimen. 5x .357mag >> 8x .32ACP, IMO.

Anything lighter than 17oz in a .357mag is more than I want to handle. Those scandium S&Ws are nasty buggers to shoot.
 
I tore up the plastic orange ring pretty quickly and bought snap caps.

Yes, touching off a .357 158 gr Hydrashok in my Scandium SC360 weighing in at ~15 oz fully loaded, best I can describe is like hitting a baseball of the end of the bat and your hand feels like its holding a buzzer for a few seconds afterwards.

Sure its not fun to shoot it, but it'd be a lot less fun if I actually needed it but didn't have it because it was "too heavy". Every time I have to carry my P3AT .380 I'm really really hoping I won't need it because its only a better than nothing last resort.

--wally.
 
I'll probably buy an ultralite .357, but I have no intention of firing anything but .38s from it. I hit the wall at 24 ounces. Anything lighter and I'll develop a severe flinch.;)

Not only that, I have to be able to fire it successfully with my offhand. I really struggle at 24 ounces and it would likely be impossible at 17 ounces.
 
Practice with the .38 loads, but carry the .357 loads. You only have five shots and the folks I know who've fired a gun in anger say they never even heard it go off let alone felt any recoil as they were so hopped up on adreline to be oblivious to every thing but the threat.

I practice with either a 2" Taurus Model 94 .22, or a Taurus 2" M85 9mm -- steel frame so minor recoil, and cheaper to shoot than .38 Special these days.

--wally.
 
wally, that's what I do right now...I think I may just take your advice. I saw a nice Titanium protector with ports....NICE!!!, matte stainless
 
What speedloaders does the 650 take? I'm currently waiting for a 650SS to arrive at my dealer.

Kharn
 
Kharn:

I have no idea what speedloaders work, as I tried a buddy's speedloader from his SW640 & stuffed it in my pants. Not pretty. The Bianchi speed strips carry much better, though are not as quick for reloading.
 
Speed strips are better than nothing. The speed loaders have a tendancy to come loose in the pants, but I thought about trying the pocket watch pocket of my jeans....there's got to be a reason it's there.
 
I may have to dryfire mine a bit then.

Did you use snap caps or the orange cylinder cover that came with the gun?

Don't dry fire without something (ring or snap caps) in there. You risk damaging the firing pin spring (don't ask how I know. . .).
 
I love mine too.
I originally bought my Kel Tec p-11 over the 650 as a BUG because for my purposes, they were very similar. The Kel Tec won out because it holds 6 more rounds. I found a 650 on sale and snatched it up. My p-11 rides better in pants pockets. Not really beacause of the weight differece as much as the shape, it just doesn't move around as much. When comparing the p-11 with carry clip vs the 650 with Barami hip grips again the p-11 always feels more secure, but like someone else said, as a coat pocket gun it doesn't get any better. I can think of a few times out walking around when I was very happy to have my 650 in hand aimed and ready to go, without even leaving my coat pocket with none the wiser.
 
I like the P11 and really wanted one...but everyone I have ever shot suffered from reliability problems...even a friend of mine from here (who shall remain nameless) swore his was always 100%...but it jammed up on me.

Hopefully the next wave will be more refined. If Kel Tec could get them more reliable, they'd have a wonderful gun.
 
I have never had a problem with my p-11, besides it's bad trigger. It's alot like a snubbie, it takes alot of practice to get down. It's my only plastic gun, after shooting CZs and revolvers all day when you shoot the little p-11 it does feel like a cheap toy that might break any moment, but it never has. After only shooting steel guns with good triggers for a long time I shot the little p-11 and thought it was broken because the trigger felt so wierd. I sent it back to Florida and they replaced all the moving parts. When I got it back it felt exactly the same. The trigger is just funky no matter what. They have supposedlly remedied this with their new single stack 9mm. It is my least favorite handgun, but it ends up with me more than anything else. It's hard to beat it's size, capacity, and power.

If it came down to it, life or death, and all that was there was a p-11 I had never touched before or a 650 I had never touched before I would go with the 650. My p-11 has however proved itself to me.
 
Last edited:
Alduro:

If you can make it down to TDSA sometime, give me a head's up & I'll bring the P-11's steroid-takin' brother, the P-40. Its a .40S&W 'roid rage in yer hand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top