Hello. First, thanks for the kind words. Yes, there are pistols and revolvers I have trouble with and they are ....ALL of them. Some days I cannot shoot as well as I'd like. I'm right on the edge of having to have my glasses changed again and on some days, I just flat cannot get a sharp focus on the front sight. Some days I cannot get mind mind in gear. On those days, I pack it up and go to the house rather than ingrain bad habits...or just do the chronograph stuff.
If I "had to walk out the door right now" in a fight, I'd go with a .45 automatic...(or a Browning 9mm HP) if required to use a handgun. Just kidding, I'll answer.
If I left the house with the pistol concealed in a pocket holster, I'd go with the Bersa, no question. Were I wearing it on a belt and could use my Bulgarian Mak as it has Novak sights, I'd probably take it, although the Bersa would be OK. I have no problem with the folks who carry Maks concealed via belt holsters, but to me, it's just as easy to tote a Gov't Model or Hi Power if wearing a belt gun and jacket.
Folks should understand that if I wind up liking a pistol that fills the same "tactical niche" as another, ie: Mak vs. Bersa, it does not mean that the other is "bad" or "less good;" just means that I've found another one I like.
In a pure "torture test," I suspect the Makarov would win in sheer numbers of rounds fired before the gun suffered a catastrophic parts failure. This is not because of any inherent design weakness I can find (so far) in the Bersa, but because the Mak is built like a tank and all steel.
Were I giving one of these two to my wife, it would be the Bersa.
It fits her a bit better and on my particular pistol, the DA trigger pull is lighter (if a bit longer) than either my Bulgarian or E. German Mak.
Best.