Rechambering a rimmed cartridge rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

longshooter99

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
70
Location
Nebraska
Ive been playing with the idea of making a custom gun for myself for awhile now and im pretty set on using a kar98 action as i have a kar98k and love it. But today I got to wondering of what i could rechamber an .303 enfield action to? the mauser action would be to something similar in case size to 7.92x57 or .30-06, but the .303 case head is .540 (according to Bob Forker) and so would it even be possible to rebarrel the action to another case of similar head size? Oh and if your wondering id never ever cut up any perfectly good military rifle, it would have to be a sporter or just the action.
Thanks
 
P14 actions have been done in belted magnums. Do not try to do a No1 of No4 with one of those.
 
But today I got to wondering of what i could rechamber an .303 enfield action to? the mauser action would be to something similar in case size to 7.92x57 or .30-06, but the .303 case head is .540...
IMHO, there is way too much ambiguity in internet discussions involving alterations such as this. You "rechamber" a rifle in which you want to reuse the original barrel and keep the original bore AND the new cartridge is dimensionally smaller than the original. For instance, you can't rechamber a .30-06 to a .308. A new chamber is simply recut. If you are changing to a smaller cartridge and/or a bore of a different size, you typically "rebarrel". In some cases, particularly when a new barrel would be cost prohibitive, such as intricately machined barrels, you "rebore" an existing barrel. Which involves boring the barrel and recutting the rifling. Or you have it "relined", in which the barrel is bored and a rifled sleeve pressed into place.

It has been my observation that when folks display a lack of understanding of the different terms and the different methods of changing a firearm's chambering, they also do not understand how much it costs. Expect to pay at least $150-$175 for a basic rechambering, $500 or more for a custom barrel, $200 for a rebore and then factor in action/bolt work to make it all function.

So the first question is, how much do you want to spend???
 
Well i anticipate a custom rifle could easily exceed $1000, and since i am currently in college i also know that it will probably be at least 5 or more years before i can afford to do anything really serious (im a junior btw).

I started off day dreaming about having a magnum rilfe and my options were either a cz 550 safari or an old mauser action. The cz would be simpler in the long run but i mainly just want something different. If i get a cz it'll probably be in .375 h&h and if its a 98 mauser action it'll be in 9.3x62 (i know its not a magnum) to make the work requried on it much less.

I am new to these forums and really appreciate your guy's advice on this stuff, thanks
 
Um, people, google is your friend
the Lee Enfeild action isn't what you want to use
PERIOD

the brits, the auseies, the indian all tried it when NATO switched to 7.62x51
ONLY the Indians stuck with it and
the Indians had to completely change the receiver steal to a new MUCH higher strength
regular maintenance with an enfeild is to head-space it and if needed, install a new bolt head, of which there were progressively longer ones to accommodate the receiver stretch that was EXPECTED over it's service life

Ya
I'd go with a Mauser
 
Last edited:
yeah im pretty sure now that im going to stick with either a mauser or cz action, the enfield was just a random idea since i do have a sporterized no4 mk1 in the safe
 
There were more than a few Enfields modified to handle larger calibers based ont he 303 casings. Elwood Epps and others did it during the previous century. There are several 35 and 40 caliber wildcats based on the 303 Enfield and used in the SMLEs.

The 9.3x62 is a decent cartridge as is the 35 Whelan. So is the 400 Whelan and the 411 Hawk if you want the largest caliber you can get from the 30-06 casing. Properly chambered, the headspace problems are nonexistant. EIther would be a good use of a M98 action.
 
The 9.3x62 is a decent cartridge as is the 35 Whelen. So is the 400 Whelen and the 411 Hawk if you want the largest caliber you can get from the 30-06 casing. Properly chambered, the headspace problems are nonexistent. Either would be a good use of a M98 action.
Any of those would be a very potent, moderate big bore. You don't need a belt to hunt some of the largest game in the world. :)
 
Well i was leaning toward the 9.3x62 because its something different than what everyone else around here shoots (.30-06 .300 win mag .270) and i though it would only be appropriate to put a mauser cartridge in a mauser action haha

Ive been really torn between the 35 whelen and 9.3x62 but now that you mention a 400 whelen and that .411 hawk you've really got my attentenion, how available is the ammunition for that? Sounds like i may need reloading equipment and would like to get some someday but college doesnt come cheap
 
Thanks for the info Jim, i will certainly hav to keep it in mind if i ever get my hands on another enfield sporter though im thinking ill stay with mauser based actions
 
"That thread is 6 years old and the link is broken."

Not for me.
But if it is for someone interested in the project, here is the contact information:
I was wrong, though, it is a mock up of a Sharps Lee instead of the later Remington Lee.
Either way, if we hadn't had the Norwegian Infatuation, we could have had a nice American designed bolt action very early on.

"1879 Sharps Lee Sporting Rifle
Original Lee patent rifles were built by the Sharps Manufacturing Company in 1879.
Now you can re-create this rare rifle using common available components. Calibers .45-70, .42-60, .405 (short), or .303.
Rifles can be built for $300 or less.
Detailed plans with photographs for builiding, as well as parts sources are available for $20, ppd.
Tom Jackson
PO Box 332
Davenport, IA 52805
(563)359-7903

What in the world is a .42-60? I don't know.
I bet a .405 (short) is a .405 Winchester shortened enough to go in the magazine of a common SMLE donor action."
 
The .303 Lee Enfield has been used successfully to take every type of game on the planet, including elephants. Now, having gotten that out of the way, the SMLE was a great battle rifle and, for its era, was the base for some nice sporters. But, as noted above, this rifle was designed and built in the earliest days of smokeless. While the No.4 Mk I was a WWII redesign, the key features of the redesign were about ease of manufacture and diminished cost. They were not significantly strengthened and the .303 round is not, by modern standards, very hot. If the barrel were worn, a 30-40 Krag would be a good rebarrel option, but the cost and issues involved in going up in caliber are significant for very little return.

If you want to build cheaply, look at the H&R Handi rifle platform. With SB2 receiver, you have actions and barrels that are fine up to 300 Win Mag level (though your shooulder may not be). Because of their design, you can rechamber (ream) quite easily, often with a rented hand reamer at home. You can barrel stub to virtually any non-belted, non-magnum rifle round. 357 Maxi, 356 Win, 45-90/110, 50 Alaskan are all popular rechambers. Barrels are available in a broad array of calibers from .17 up through 500 S&W at under $150 factory fitted, and less if you can do a little home smithing. An Sb2 receiver with generally sell for @ $100. There are a wide array of finished stocks in wood and polymer available and several options for semi-finished custom stocks. It's an ideal platform for DIY home smithing at reasonable prices.

Here's a 45LC/454 Casull Stutzen that I built this Winter. SB2 receiver; 45LC carbine barrel reamed to 454, and a Mannlicher style stock semi-finished from Gunstocks Inc:

004-7.jpg

And here's a 20 ga that I built on a case color SB1 receiver with Buffalo Classic stock and forend, as pleasant a little grouse gun as you could want:

004-1.jpg

Certainly worth investigating and brings your Five year time horizoon much closer.
 
i think having a rifle in a pistol caliber would be a neat project but im sure converting an existing one would take alot of time and money, which is why a rifle like the one in your picture would be much more ideal.

Other than the new barrel work an such, i'd be worried about how it would feed in anything other than a lever action. A set up like Taurus Circuit Judge would be really fun but i would prefer it in a full sized rifle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top