Regular vs. MilSpec vs. Magnum Primers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hypnogator

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
1,869
Location
AZ, WA
I have been reading conflicting information on using regular vs. MilSpec vs. Magnum primers in loading for .223 in the AR Platform. A couple of months ago, I bought a carton of CCI-41 primers, which seemed to be actually giving a slightly lower average velocity than regular CCI-400s. Finally, a week ago, I managed to find a box of CCI-450 primers, so I decided to test the three types of primer.

To test the primer variance, I loaded 30 rounds of .223, using new Lake City cases with 25.0 gr. AR-Comp under a Hornady 55-gr. V-Max bullet. Ten of the cases were primed with CCI-400s, ten with CCI-41s, and ten with CCI-450s. All charges were weighed on my new digital scale. I shot them this afternoon, recording the velocities with my new (to me) CED Millennium chronograph with the following results:

The CCI-400 standard primers gave an average velocity of 3054.40 fps, with a SD of 19.31.

The CCI-41 MilSpec primers gave an average velocity of 3068.90 fps, with a SD of 13.83.

The CCI-450 magnum primers gave an average velocity of 3054.60 fps, with a SD of 11.01.

In this test, the MilSpec primers proved slightly hotter (but only by 14 fps) than either the standard or magnum primers, and the magnum proved to be the most consistent.

As a check of my chronograph under the same weather conditions (mid-60s) I fired 10 rounds of Wolf Gold 55-gr. .223, which averaged 2982.80 fps, SD 28.09, and 10 rounds of Carl Gustav 62-gr LAP 5.56mm, which averaged 2980 fps, SD 12.82.

It would seem to me, that at least with AR-Comp powder, there is little difference between the three types of primer in terms of velocity, and virtually no difference between CCI standard and magnum primers. :what::eek:

FWIW :cool:
 
According to CCI ...

Their CCI-400 primers are standard small rifle primers.
Their CCI-450 primers are their magnum strength small rifle primers.
Their CCI #41 NATO primers are magnum strength primers but the primer compound isn't as sensitive as the compound in their standard or magnum strength primers.

Since the #41 primers are magnum strength I'm surprised the results for the #41 and 450 primers weren't more similar.

Thanks for the inf from your tests...
 
Run the same test another day and it may turn out different. 14 FPS isn't much, and ten rounds isn't a big sample.

That said, I use 5, 6, and 7 round samples all the time. I just realize the results are not set in stone. It does however, give me a good indication of what to expect. When I repeat the chrono test a couple of more times and the numbers come out similarly, I know it is close enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top