fatmanonabike
Member
I'm reloading for my 30-30 and I'm new at it. Comparing my reloads to LeverEvolution, they also grouped well but about 5.5 inches low. How significant is that reduction in velocity?
Well that empirical data kind of throws a lot of doubt on the physics (theoretical) of barrel rise during recoil making the slower bullet take a higher trajectory.fatmanonabike
[I'm reloading for my 30-30 and I'm new at it. Comparing my reloads to LeverEvolution, they also grouped well but about 5.5 inches low. How significant is that reduction in velocity?]
Yesterday I took the chrono to the range with the 30-30 sights set for my reloads. I'm using Win 748 and 170gr Sierra bullets. They chrono'd at 2056 fps with a four shot group in a 1"x1 1/4" group. This is using a FO front sight and a cheap rear peep sight.
I also had 10 rounds of the Hornady Leverevolution 160 gr ammo. It chrono'd at 2350 (approx). The group size wasn't anywhere near as good as my reloads and it shot 6 inches high and 3 inches right of my loads.
I was surprised at the results but will be using my reloads because they are more accurate even though they are a little slower .
I don't think the deer will notice the difference!
Well that empirical data kind of throws a lot of doubt on the physics (theoretical) of barrel rise during recoil making the slower bullet take a higher trajectory.
Back to the drawing board for me.
Lost Sheep
Barrel rise is more of an issue with handguns because of the way the recoil is handled.Well that empirical data kind of throws a lot of doubt on the physics (theoretical) of barrel rise during recoil making the slower bullet take a higher trajectory.
I was surprised at the results but will be using my reloads because they are more accurate even though they are a little slower .
I don't think the deer will notice the difference!
Thanks. I shoot handguns at paper so often forget about the differences.Barrel rise is more of an issue with handguns because of the way the recoil is handled.
Isn't inertia, recoil and action-reaction (Newton's laws of motion) considered physics?The misunderstanding that barrel rise is a non sequitur to this discussion has nothing to do with the laws of physics.