Coronach said:
However, for a nice little civvie SHTF carbine, huntin' or plinkin' gun, you can do a lot worse.
This is exactly what I was thinking.
I had some range time with an AR-15, and I didn't enjoy the experience. Iv been shooting AKs, SKS, and Bolt actions all my life, so I was not at all prepared for the searing puff of noxious gas that the S&W M&P 15pc spit into my face with every shot. The fact that I could feel the free-floated barrel resonating after every shot was a little distracting a well.
True the AR-15 could lay down a higher rate of suppressive fire...But Im just one person, so who's maneuvers would I be COVERING with this suppressive fire?
Im not on a Police squad, and Im not in the military. Even with my AK I can only get about 1 aimed shot per second. You could probably do just as good with this Remington pump rifle.
Long story short, I don't see how the AR-15 has any real advantages over the Remington 7615. Sure the AR can "burn" ammo faster doing a bump-fire or whatever, but you wont put out aimed fire any faster. From my experience, an 870 based pump action would probably be more reliable than ANY semi-automatic rifle that I know of. The above range report shows us that the stock AR doesn't have any real accuracy advantage over it either.
I sold my 223 bolt gun a while back to fund a handgun purchase, and I have sorely missed it ever since. Iv been saving and researching new 223 rifles for a while, and had settled on the Tikka T3 light. I had forgotten Remington even made the 7615, but now that i have been reminded, I am sorely tempted to change my mind. It would be a hell of a varmint / defense gun with a 30mm red dot mounted low.