Reply to California's Opposition Brief in Silveira v. Lockyer 2nd Amendment Lawsuit

[2dogs]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to California's Opposition Brief in Silveira v. Lockyer Second Amendment Lawsuit

PDF file.

http://www.keepandbeararms.com/Silveira/CAreply.pdf

 

[Jim March]

Not bad. I'd have mentioned that Cruikshank was horrifically racist and a poor choice of cites by Lockyer's Lunatic Lawyers, but that's OK.

 

[tyme]

Also, if the reason state firearms bans are valid is that the 2nd isn't incorporated, why has Congress passed laws prohibiting firearms ownership? Oh, I forgot, their justification is the commerce clause. And the court would almost certainly be 5-4 in opposition to an assault weapon sitting in someone's home being considered an impediment to interstate commerce.